Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of a Contact Lens Cleaning and Disinfecting Solution

A Safety and Effectiveness Study of a Contact Lens Cleaning and Disinfecting Solution

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05565937
Enrollment
295
Registered
2022-10-04
Start date
2023-04-12
Completion date
2024-02-28
Last updated
2025-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Refractive Ametropia

Brief summary

Approximately 340 participants (680 eyes) will be enrolled in this three-month, two-arm, 1:1 randomized, parallel-group, bilateral, double-masked study at approximately 22 investigative sites in the United States. Participants will be required to wear dispensed study lenses on a daily wear basis for three months with scheduled in-office replacement of study lenses at the 1-Month and 2-Month Follow-Up Visits.

Interventions

DEVICEBL-3100-NBR03 multi-purpose solution

BL-3100-NBR03 multi-purpose solution used to clean and disinfect contact lenses

DEVICErenu® Advanced Formula multi-purpose solution

renu® Advanced Formula multi-purpose solution used to clean and disinfect contact lenses

Sponsors

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Is of legal age (at least 18) on the date the Informed Consent Form (ICF) is signed 2. Is able to read, understand, and provide written informed consent on the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Ethics Committee (EC) approved ICF and provide authorization as appropriate for local privacy regulations 3. Is a habitual wearer (at least 3 months) 4. Has typically cleaned and disinfected their pre-study contact lenses daily 5. Must have spectacle correctable distance visual acuity through spherocylindrical refraction to 40 letters (0.14 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) or better in each eye, at 2 meters distance with high contrast chart 6. Has clear central corneas and is free of any anterior segment disorders 7. Is a habitual user of a lens care product for cleaning, disinfecting, and storage of lenses 8. Requires lens correction in both eyes 9. Wears the same manufacturer and brand of lens in both eyes 10. Agrees to wear study lenses on a daily wear basis for approximately three months 11. Is willing and able to comply with all treatment and follow-up/study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

1. Is currently using a hydrogen-peroxide cleaning and disinfecting solution 2. Participated in any drug or device clinical investigation within 30 days prior to entry into this study 3. Is a female of childbearing potential (those who are not surgically sterilized or postmenopausal) if they meet any one of the following conditions: * they are currently pregnant * they plan to become pregnant during the study * they are breastfeeding 4. Has worn gas permeable (GP) lenses within the last 30 days 5. Has worn polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) lenses within the last three months 6. Has typically worn their pre-study contact lenses on an extended wear basis, sleeping in their lenses one night or more per week, during the last year 7. Has any systemic disease currently affecting ocular health or which in the Investigator's opinion may have an effect on ocular health during the course of the study 8. Subjects with an active ocular disease, or who are using any ocular medication. 9. Is using any medications that will, in the Investigator's opinion, affect ocular physiology or lens performance 10. Currently wears monovision, multifocal, or toric contact lenses 11. Has ocular astigmatism of 1.00D or greater in either eye 12. Has anisometropia (spherical equivalent) of greater than 2.00D 13. Has any grade 2 or greater finding during the slit-lamp examination (refer to Appendix B for Methods of Clinical Evaluation) 14. Has corneal infiltrates, of ANY GRADE 15. Has any Present ungraded finding during the slit-lamp examination (refer to Appendix B for Methods of Clinical Evaluation) that, in the Investigator's judgment, interferes with contact lens wear. 16. Has typically worn their pr-study control lenses on an extended wear bases, sleeping on their lenses one night or more per week, during the last year. 17. Is aphakic 18. Is amblyopic 19. Has had any corneal surgery (e.g., refractive surgery) 20. Is allergic to any component in the study care products. 21. Is an employee of any of the study investigative sites or a family member of an employee of the investigative site, including family members living outside of the employee's household 22. Is an Ophthalmologist, an Optometrist, an Optician, or an Ophthalmic Assistant/Technician, or currently resides with a person with any of these specialties 23. Is an employee of a manufacturer of contact lenses or contact lens care products (e.g., Alcon, Bausch + Lomb, Ciba Vision, CooperVision, Vistakon, Johnson & Johnson, etc.) or currently resides with a person employed by any of these manufacturers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Comfort Averaged Over All Follow-up VisitsAssessed at all follow-up visits through 3 months.Overall comfort will be assessed for each eye on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 denoting the most favorable response
Vision Averaged Over All Follow-up VisitsAssessed at all follow-up visits through 3 months.Vision will be assessed for each eye on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 denoting the most favorable response
The Proportion of Eyes With a Maximum Degree of Front Surface Deposits Grade of <= 2 Over All Follow-up Visits With 0 Being Absent of Deposits.Assessed at all follow-up visits through 3 months.The degree of front surface deposits will be graded for each eye as: 0 - Absent, clean surface. 1. \- Very slight, only visible after tear film drying. 2. \- Slight, visible deposits easily removable. 3. \- Moderate, deposits adherent and not removable. 4. \- Severe, non-removable deposits and comfort affected.
The Proportion of Eyes With Any Slit-lamp Findings Greater Than Grade 2 Over All Follow-up Visits.Assessed at 3 monthsGraded slit-lamp findings will be assessed for each eye using Grades 0 through 4.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BL-3100-NBR03
BL-3100-NBR03 multi-purpose solution BL-3100-NBR03 multi-purpose solution: BL-3100-NBR03 multi-purpose solution used to clean and disinfect contact lenses
143
Renu® Advanced Formula
renu® Advanced Formula multi-purpose solution renu® Advanced Formula multi-purpose solution: renu® Advanced Formula multi-purpose solution used to clean and disinfect contact lenses
152
Total295

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event01
Overall StudyAnisometropia01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up20
Overall StudyPersistent study-related symptoms /complaints11
Overall StudyPregnancy02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBL-3100-NBR03TotalRenu® Advanced Formula
Age, Continuous35.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.26
36.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.08
37.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.84
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants15 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
134 Participants280 Participants146 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
16 Participants33 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
13 Participants29 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
109 Participants221 Participants112 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
143 participants295 participants152 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
100 Participants209 Participants109 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
43 Participants86 Participants43 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1430 / 151
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1430 / 151
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1431 / 151

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Comfort Averaged Over All Follow-up Visits

Overall comfort will be assessed for each eye on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 denoting the most favorable response

Time frame: Assessed at all follow-up visits through 3 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BL-3100-NBR03Overall Comfort Averaged Over All Follow-up Visits91.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.99
Renu® Advanced FormulaOverall Comfort Averaged Over All Follow-up Visits90.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.83
Primary

The Proportion of Eyes With a Maximum Degree of Front Surface Deposits Grade of <= 2 Over All Follow-up Visits With 0 Being Absent of Deposits.

The degree of front surface deposits will be graded for each eye as: 0 - Absent, clean surface. 1. \- Very slight, only visible after tear film drying. 2. \- Slight, visible deposits easily removable. 3. \- Moderate, deposits adherent and not removable. 4. \- Severe, non-removable deposits and comfort affected.

Time frame: Assessed at all follow-up visits through 3 months.

Population: All randomized subjects with at least one non-missing values for front surface deposit grading. Two subjects (4 eyes) in the BL-3100-NBR03 arm and 1 subject (2 eyes) in the renu Advanced Formula arm with no front surface grading measurements reported were excluded from this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BL-3100-NBR03The Proportion of Eyes With a Maximum Degree of Front Surface Deposits Grade of <= 2 Over All Follow-up Visits With 0 Being Absent of Deposits.The Percentage of Eyes with Front Surface Deposits Grade of <= 299.3 percentage of eyes
BL-3100-NBR03The Proportion of Eyes With a Maximum Degree of Front Surface Deposits Grade of <= 2 Over All Follow-up Visits With 0 Being Absent of Deposits.The Percentage of Eyes with Front Surface Deposits Grade of >20.7 percentage of eyes
Renu® Advanced FormulaThe Proportion of Eyes With a Maximum Degree of Front Surface Deposits Grade of <= 2 Over All Follow-up Visits With 0 Being Absent of Deposits.The Percentage of Eyes with Front Surface Deposits Grade of <= 297.7 percentage of eyes
Renu® Advanced FormulaThe Proportion of Eyes With a Maximum Degree of Front Surface Deposits Grade of <= 2 Over All Follow-up Visits With 0 Being Absent of Deposits.The Percentage of Eyes with Front Surface Deposits Grade of >22.3 percentage of eyes
Primary

The Proportion of Eyes With Any Slit-lamp Findings Greater Than Grade 2 Over All Follow-up Visits.

Graded slit-lamp findings will be assessed for each eye using Grades 0 through 4.

Time frame: Assessed at 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BL-3100-NBR03The Proportion of Eyes With Any Slit-lamp Findings Greater Than Grade 2 Over All Follow-up Visits.Present0 percentage of eyes
BL-3100-NBR03The Proportion of Eyes With Any Slit-lamp Findings Greater Than Grade 2 Over All Follow-up Visits.Absent100 percentage of eyes
Renu® Advanced FormulaThe Proportion of Eyes With Any Slit-lamp Findings Greater Than Grade 2 Over All Follow-up Visits.Present0.7 percentage of eyes
Renu® Advanced FormulaThe Proportion of Eyes With Any Slit-lamp Findings Greater Than Grade 2 Over All Follow-up Visits.Absent99.3 percentage of eyes
Primary

Vision Averaged Over All Follow-up Visits

Vision will be assessed for each eye on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 denoting the most favorable response

Time frame: Assessed at all follow-up visits through 3 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BL-3100-NBR03Vision Averaged Over All Follow-up Visits95.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.69
Renu® Advanced FormulaVision Averaged Over All Follow-up Visits94.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.75

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026