COPD Exacerbation
Conditions
Keywords
LAMA, Bedtime administration
Brief summary
To examine, among once-daily LAMA using COPD patients, whether evening administration of LAMA is superior with respect to the incidence of hospitalization requiring AECOPD or death from all causes than the more conventional morning administration.
Detailed description
One of the most feared complications associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is acute exacerbation (AECOPD). On average, each COPD patient experiences 0.5 to 3.5 acute exacerbations per year, which is an important reason for the hospitalization, disease progression and mortality as well as decline in health status and lung function(1,2). Treatment with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) reduces dyspnoea and the risk of exacerbations in patients with COPD by binding to muscarinic receptors in bronchial smooth musculature and thus inhibiting cholinergic bronchial constriction. LAMAs are given as inhalation therapy once daily (most often) or twice daily(3). Most COPD-patients experience their worst symptoms and experience exacerbations in early morning hours, before getting out of bed(4). This might be explained by the physiological diurnal changes in the activity of the parasympathetic homeostasis system since this is most active at night to improve digestion and other secretions(5). Correspondingly, the activity of the sympathetic system is physiologically suppressed at night, and stimulation of β-2 receptors is thus also low (and opposite for M-3 receptors). Taken together, the balance of sympathetic-parasympathetic tone is shifted significantly towards the latter. Most available LAMA treatments are dosed once daily in the morning. Thus, for a COPD patient, being at a trough level of LAMA (which antagonizes the para-sympathetic system) at late night/early morning, may carry a hazard for the patient. Studies have found that lung function measured as forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) improvement peaks approximately 2 hours after LAMA administration, and that FEV1 is still significantly improved at 7 hours post treatment but decreases towards the trough level of the LAMA(6). However, as a corollary to the above, when the medicine is probably most needed (02.00 a.m. to 07.00 a.m.), the effect is at its lowest level, which may not be desirable, since a low effect of the most important preventive medicine against AECOPD at this time, may lead to more exacerbations. Evening administration, on the contrary, would lead to a greater and more certain effect regarding bronchodilation and reduced secretion in the early morning hours, and a maximum effect should be expected during the entire night.
Interventions
LAMAs administered at bedtime (8pm - 2am)
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Investigators will be blinded for the treatment allocation, but the trial participants will not be blinded. However, since all endpoints are assessed using prespecified registry-based definitions, bias should be negligible.
Intervention model description
Patients will be randomized 1:1 to one of two treatment strategies by computer-generated allocation, to either LAMA administration in the morning or evening. Randomization groups will be allocated according to a computer-generated randomization. Data will be entered by participants directly into REDCap questionnaires. Consent and randomization will take place on day 0. The result of the randomization will be shown directly to the participant on their screen and sent to the participant's official electronic mailbox.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Age more than or equal to 30 years 2. Current treatment with LAMA once daily (as recorded in the Danish National Prescription Registry and confirmed by the participant via questionnaire) 3. Self-reported COPD
Exclusion criteria
1\. Patients who decline to participate.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| COPD-related hospitalization-requiring (severe) exacerbations | 12 months from randomization |
| All-cause mortality | 12 months from randomization |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of admissions in the intensive care unit (ICU) for all causes | 12 months from randomization | — |
| Number of admissions requiring non-invasive ventilation (NIV) treatment | 12 months from randomization | — |
| Mortality (all-cause) | 12 months from randomization | — |
| Moderate, non-hospitalization-requiring COPD exacerbations | 12 months from randomization | — |
| Change in COPD assesment test (CAT) score | 12 months from randomization | Measured by questionnaire at 6 and 12 months post-randomization. Measured on a scale from 0 to 40. Score of 0-9 means low impact of COPD and score of 31-40 means very high impact. |
| Change in medical research council (MRC) score | 12 months from randomization | Measured by questionnaire at 6 and 12 months post-randomization. Measures baseline functional disability due to dyspnoea on a scale from 0 to 5, 0 meaning no disability and 5 meaning significant disability due to COPD. |
| Use of short-acting β2-agonists (SABA); pick-up rate | 12 months from randomization | Data collected from the Danish National Prescription Registry |
| Number of admissions for all causes | 12 months from randomization | — |
Countries
Denmark