Skip to content

Venous Vascular Closure System Versus Manual Compression Following Single Shot Device AF Ablation

Venous Vascular Closure System Versus Manual Compression Following Single Shot Device AF Ablation - the Style-AF Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05563142
Acronym
Style-AF
Enrollment
125
Registered
2022-10-03
Start date
2022-11-22
Completion date
2024-03-01
Last updated
2024-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

Prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center study to compare the safety and efficacy of the Perclose ProStyle suture-mediated closure device (PPS) as to manual compression (MC) for venous hemostasis following single shot device (SSD) based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to show that the time to ambulation after PVI can be reduced by deploying vascular closure device versus manual compression and a figure-of-8 suture only. Safety, efficacy and feasibility of the PPS device should be proven, too.

Interventions

PROCEDUREdeploying vascular closure device versus manual compression

patients will be randomized to either group 1 or group 2 in a 1:1 ratio:

Sponsors

University of Luebeck
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients age \>18 * Elective catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation using a 6 to 14 Fr inner diameter introducer sheath with a minimum of 1 and maximum of 2 femoral venous access sites

Exclusion criteria

* Active systemic or cutaneous infection, or inflammation in vicinity of the groin * Platelet count \< 100,000 cells/mm3 * BMI \> 45 kg/m2 or \< 20 kg/m2 * Attempted femoral arterial access or inadvertent arterial puncture * Procedural complications that interfered with routine recovery, ambulation, or discharge times * Incorrect sheath placement * Intraprocedural bleeding or thrombotic complications * Access site-specific eligibility criteria to exclude problems with gaining access or location of sheath

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to ambulation6 hourselapsed time between removal of the final closure device or removal of the final sheath and when the patient can stand and walk 20 ft without evidence of venous re-bleeding from the femoral access site.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
time to hemostasis6 hourselapsed time between removal of the closure device or the sheath and first observed and confirmed venous hemostasis, for each access site
time to discharge eligibility3 dayselapsed time between removal of the final closure device or final sheath and when the patient was eligible for hospital discharge based solely on the assessment of the access site, as determined by the medical team
time to discharge3 dayselapsed time between removal of the final closure device or final sheath and when the patient was discharged from the institution
total post procedure time6 hourselapsed time between removal of the last procedural device for the index procedure and when the patient was able to successfully ambulate
Incidence of major adverse events30 daysIncidence of major adverse events within 30 days after the procedure
Incidence of minor adverse events30 daysIncidence of minor adverse events within 30 days after the procedure
Time to final hemostasis3 daysAttainment of final hemostasis at all venous access sites and freedom from major venous access site closure-related complications
time to closure eligibility6 hourselapsed time between removal of the last procedural device for the index procedure and removal of the first closure device or first sheath

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026