Skip to content

Impact of Deep Neuromuscular Blockade During Total Hip Replacement Surgery on Postoperative Recovery and Immune Function

Deep Versus Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade During Total HIP Replacement Surgery to Improve POstoperative Quality of Recovery and Immune Function: a Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05562999
Acronym
HIPPO
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-10-03
Start date
2022-11-18
Completion date
2024-08-29
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Innate Inflammatory Response, Neuromuscular Blockade, Postoperative Complications, Quality of Life

Brief summary

Monocenter randomized controlled trial to compare the effect of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) versus moderate NMB during total hip replacement surgery on postoperative quality of recovery and innate immune function.

Detailed description

Rationale: Neuromuscular blockade agents (NMB) may enable surgeons to optimize exposure during hip surgery. With an increasing depth of NMB, manipulation of muscles and adjunctive tissues may be easier, therefore reducing damage to muscles and adjunct tissues. Accumulating evidence exists that the use of deep NMB in laparoscopic surgery is associated with a better quality of recovery and lower pain scores. However, whether this accounts for open surgery is still unknown. In addition, surgery is associated with postoperative immune suppression. Surgical stress and damage cause the release of Danger Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs). After trauma and sepsis, the release of DAMPs is associated with immune paralysis and a higher susceptibility to infectious complications. Previous research indicates that DAMPS are the origin of postoperative immune suppression. The use of deep NMB in hip surgery may reduce surgical damage and thereby lead to a better quality of recovery and secondarily a better preservation of immune cell function. Primary objective: To establish the relationship between the use of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) versus moderate NMB and the quality of recovery after total hip replacement surgery (THR) Secondary objective: To establish the relationship between the use of deep NMB versus moderate NMB and innate immune function after THR surgery Study design: A monocenter, blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial Study population: adults who are scheduled for primary or secondary hip replacement surgery under general anaesthesia. Intervention: Patients will be randomized between a deep NMB (post tetanic count (PTC) 1-2) and moderate NMB (Train-of-four (TOF) 1-2) Primary endpoint: Quality of Recovery score (QoR-40) at postoperative day 1. Secondary endpoints: postoperative innate immune function, QoR-40 at postoperative day 30, 30-day postoperative (infectious) complications, postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption

Interventions

DRUGRocuronium Bromide

Moderate NMB (TOF 1-2)

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Radboud University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age of 18 years or older * Scheduled for total hip replacement surgery under general anaesthesia * Informed consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

* Insufficient control of the Dutch language to read the patient information and to fill out de questionnaires * Known or suspected hypersensitivity to rocuronium or sugammadex * Deficiency of vitamin K dependent clotting factors or coagulopathy * Severe renal disease (creatinine clearance \<30 ml/min), including patients on dialysis * Severe liver disease (Child-Pugh Classification C) * Known or suspected neuromuscular disorders impairing neuromuscular function * Women who are or may be pregnant or currently breastfeeding * Chronic use of psychotropic drugs * Use of immunomodulatory medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Recovery 40 (QoR-40) questionnaire scorePostoperative day 140 points (minimum: extremely poor quality of recovery) to 200 points (maximum: excellent quality of recovery)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Immune function represented by serum cytokinePostoperative day 1Serum cytokine IL-6 level
Immune function represented by IL-10Postoperative day 1Serum cytokine IL-10 level
Immune function represented by TNF-aPostoperative day 1Serum cytokine TNF-a level
Immune function represented by ex-vivo IL-6 production capacityPostoperative day 1Ex-vivo IL-6 production capacity upon whole blood Lipopolysaccharide(LPS) stimulation
Quality of Recovery 40 (QoR-40) questionnaire scorePostoperative day 3040 points (minimum: extremely poor quality of recovery) to 200 points (maximum: excellent quality of recovery)
Pain score by numeric pain rating (NRS) scaleDuring hospital admission up to 3 days postoperativepain scores with NRS 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain)
Postoperative complications30 postoperative dayspostoperative complications scored by Clavien-Dindo classification; grade 0 (no deviation from ideal) grade 5 (death of patient)
Infectious postoperative complications30 postoperative daysPostoperative infectious complications scored the definitions of the StEP-COMPAC group initiative
Analgesia consumptionDuring hospital admission up to 3 days postoperativenon-cumulative and cumulative opioid use per day in morphine equivalent
Immune function represented by ex-vivo IL-10 production capacityPostoperative day 1Ex-vivo IL-10 production capacity upon whole blood LPS stimulation

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026