Skip to content

COMParison of the EffecT of dEvice Closure in Alleviating Migraine With PFO (COMPETE-2)

Comparison of the Effect of Device Closure in Alleviating Migraine With Patent Foramen Oval (COMPETE-2)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05561660
Enrollment
460
Registered
2022-09-30
Start date
2022-10-01
Completion date
2025-10-01
Last updated
2023-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Migraine, Patent Foramen Ovale

Brief summary

Migraine attacks are episodic disorder that affects approximately 12% of the population, and studies have shown that 41-48% of migraineurs have a combination of patent foramen ovale (PFO). Clinical Observational studies have been linking PFO occlusion with the effectiveness in improving migraine symptoms and reducing the frequency of attacks. However, several RCTs have shown negative primary results, making it unclear whether PFO occlusion is effective in treating migraine. Our study is a prospective, double-blind, multi-center, and randomized study designed to test the effectiveness of migraine alleviation by performing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in patients who are also diagnosed with PFO and migraine.

Interventions

DEVICEPFO device closure

Participants randomized into this group will take PFO device closure.

DRUGAspirin

Participants randomized into this group will take aspirin 200mg qd for 6 months.

Sponsors

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18-65 ; 2. Diagnosed migraine by ICHD-3 3. History of migraine longer than 1 year 4. TCD/TTE/TEE diagnosed patent foramen ovale 5. Willing to participant and agree to follow-ups 6. Undertook medication therapy for three months without a responder rate higher or equal to 50%

Exclusion criteria

1. Migraine caused by other reason 2. Had TIA/stroke history 3. Hypersensitive or hyposensitive to the study drug

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Responder rateFrom baseline period to 12-month treatment periodDefined as a 50% reduction from the monthly number of migraine attacks during the baseline phase to the monthly number of migraine attacks during the treatment phase.
Treatment safetyFrom baseline period to 12-month treatment periodAdverse events after medication treatment Adverse events after medication treatment Adverse events after medication treatment Adverse events after medication treatment Adverse events after medication treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Migraine days change per monthFrom baseline period to 12-month treatment periodChange in the mean number of migraine days from baseline to treatment phase.
Number of migraine attacks change per monthFrom baseline period to 12-month treatment periodChange in the mean number of migraine attacks from baseline to treatment phase.
Percentage of migraine changeFrom baseline period to 12-month treatment periodParticipants experienced 75%, or greater reduction in migraine headache attacks during treatment phase as compared to baseline phase.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXiangbin Pan, MD
panxiangbin@fuwaihospital.org88396666
Backup ContactFengwen Zhang, MD
zhangfengwen08@126.com88396666

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026