Skip to content

Preference Comparisons for Algorithms to Hear Speech

Comparison of a Novel Algorithm to a Standard Microphone Configuration for Hearing Preference

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05561335
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-09-30
Start date
2023-03-21
Completion date
2023-10-31
Last updated
2023-09-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss

Brief summary

Twenty people with hearing impairment will be tested and fitted binaurally with hearing aids. During a real-world listening situation, each participant will be asked to compare one program with a novel algorithm to one with a standard microphone configuration. They will provide ratings on a range of outcome measures including overall preference and awareness of background noise. Overall and specific preferences for the different programs/algorithms will be determined by their subjective responses to determine if there is a significant difference between the two programs.

Detailed description

People with hearing loss/impairment often have difficulty not only hearing certain sounds (e.g., environmental and speech sounds) but also listening in certain situations such as those where noise competes with speech. This is a common situation in people's real life conversations and one which different hearing instrument algorithms could facilitate. This study will investigate the listening preferences of people with hearing impairment while wearing hearing aids. They will listen to speech in a situation which is commonly reported as difficult for people who wear hearing aids. Participants will wear one set of hearing aids set to their hearing loss with two programs providing these different algorithms. By having the participants toggle (with a remote control) back and forth between algorithms designed for these real-life difficult listening situations, they can rate their preferences and listening experiences. Of particular interest, in addition to overall preference, are ratings of the background noise, listening effort and annoyance of artefacts.

Interventions

DEVICEhearing aid -novel program

novel microphone configuration

DEVICEhearing aid - standard program

standard microphone configuration

Sponsors

Western University
CollaboratorOTHER
Sonova AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Subjects fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the investigation: * Including adults with sensorineural mild to moderate-severe hearing loss * hearing aid experience (greater than 6 months) * who are able to complete the task in English. * Language: Can speak and understand English Fluently Hearing loss within the fitting ranges of the investigational products. * Healthy outer ear. * Ability to understand instructions. * Ability to describe listening experiences. * Ability to fill out questionnaires. * Informed consent as documented by signature.

Exclusion criteria

\- The presence of any one of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall preference for a specific microphone setting/configuration20 minutesRating of preference on a scale from 0-100, with descriptors ('very low' to 'very high')

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rating of awareness of background noise20 minutesScale from 0-100 with descriptors ('not at all' to 'extremely aware')
Rating of Listening effort20 minutesScale from 1 - 7 with descriptors ('not at all' to 'very')
Rating of annoyance of artefacts20 minutesRating on a scale from 0-100 with descriptors ('not at all' to 'extremely annoying')

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactDon Hayes, PhD
don.hayes@unitron.com519 500 3618

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026