Skip to content

Use of Joystick-operated Ride-on-toys to Improve Affected Arm Use and Function in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Effects of a Novel, Home-based Training Program Using a Joystick-operated, Modified, Powered Ride-on-car on Bilateral Upper Extremity Function in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05559320
Enrollment
15
Registered
2022-09-29
Start date
2022-11-15
Completion date
2024-05-11
Last updated
2025-06-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Brief summary

This research is being done to explore if modified, commercially available, joystick-operated, ride-on-cars can be used to promote bilateral arm function in children with hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy (CP). Specifically, the study evaluates the effects of a 6-week, home-based, child-friendly, innovative program that uses modified, commercially available, joystick-operated, powered ride-on-toys to promote spontaneous affected arm use and function in children with hemiplegic CP.

Detailed description

Prior to the start of the study, researchers will conduct a phone screening with the family to confirm their child's eligibility to participate in the study. Once eligibility is confirmed, during the pretest session, standardized assessments will be conducted to evaluate the child's ability to use their affected arm for different functional activities. During this testing visit, researchers will also use small sensors on the child's arms and observe their movements as they complete a reaching task. In addition, caregivers will be asked to complete questionnaires to obtain information on their child's overall health, development, and their ability to use their affected arm for various activities of daily living. Assessments and questionnaires will be repeated again at the mid-point of the study (that corresponds with completion of the 6-week control phase), and at posttest (that corresponds with completion of the 6-week home-based intervention phase). Researchers will video record all testing and training sessions so that children's performance can be scored later. Children will also be asked to wear wrist monitors on both hands to assess their habitual activity levels on dominant and non-dominant arms for 1 week at the pretest, at the mid-point assessment, during the first and last weeks of the training, and at posttest. This study consists of 2 phases: the control phase and the intervention phase. During the first 6-week control phase, the researchers will contact families on a weekly basis to obtain information regarding different therapies that their child receives both in and out of school. In the next 6-week intervention phase, researchers will visit the child's home twice a week to provide a training program involving joystick-operated ride-on-toys that will encourage the child to use their affected arm to control and navigate the ride-on-car through their physical environment. During the intervention phase the ride-on-car will be left at the child's home so that children can practice driving the car under caregiver supervision for additional days during the week. All testing sessions will be conducted before and after the control and intervention phases of the study.

Interventions

DEVICERide-on-toy navigation training

The training program will involve a set of activities where children will be encouraged to drive a joystick-operated ride-on-toy to navigate through their physical environment. The training will involve will involve progressively challenging multi-directional navigational games such as shape mazes, treasure hunts, relay races, and obstacle courses that will require children to use their affected arm skillfully to navigate through the courses.

BEHAVIORALUpper extremity functional training

In addition to the navigation practice, along the multi-directional courses, children will complete tasks at multiple stations that will involve both gross and fine motor activities. The goal of the training will be to use their arm for functional goal-directed tasks and games that will involve elements of reaching, grasping, in-hand manipulation, and release. We will use props such as balls, bean bags, cups, cones, and small toys to practice skills such as catching, throwing, picking up, pushing, pulling, opening, closing, etc.

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
Virginia Tech (National Pediatric Rehabilitation Resource Center i.e. C-PROGRESS)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)
CollaboratorNIH
American Academy of Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Connecticut
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Are boys or girls between the ages of 3 - 8 years * Have been diagnosed with hemiplegic Cerebral palsy by a medical doctor with clear asymmetry in upper extremity strength and control, i.e., one upper limb is clearly weaker than the other; * Have had no physical trauma (including surgery) in the past 6 months; * Demonstrate awareness of objects in their environment through their visual system; * Can use their upper extremity or trunk to activate a joystick placed within reachable distance; * Can maintain a supported sitting position for at least 20 minutes

Exclusion criteria

* Have only lower limb involvement * Are capable of using both hands together very well for functional activities; * Age \>8 years or below 3 years of age * Exceed safe weight or height limits of the device; * Have parents who know at the time of the initial contact that they will not be able to complete training and all the posttest sessions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
# of Training Sessions Completed Assessed Using Training LogsFrom start to end of 6-week intervention phase on a weekly basisResearchers will also maintain training logs during the intervention phase to document # of training sessions completed out of the total possible sessions (12).
Changes in Habitual Arm Activity on the Affected SideBaseline, at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)We will provide children with the Actigraph wrist activity monitors that can be worn like a wristwatch. Children will be asked to wear 2 wrist monitors, one each on both wrists, at 6 timepoints: (a) for one week at the pretest, (b) for one week at mid-point assessment, (c) during first week of training, (d) during last week of training, and (e) for one week at posttest. Children will be provided 2 watches during the pretest visit and they will be requested to wear the watches on both wrists for the next 1 week prior to the start of the training program. Children will be asked to wear the monitor continuously when awake and while sleeping for a minimum of 4 days - 1 weekend day and 3 weekdays.
Changes in Kinematic Measures of Movement Control on the Affected Armat 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)Data will be collected during a unilateral and bilateral reach-grasp task at self-selected speed involving different objects (foam ball, rattle, and square block) placed at half arm's length (near) and at arm's length (far) on the table. Sensors (Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs)) will be placed on both hands, both forearms, both arms, and the C7 spinous process. We will assess range of motion of joints during upper extremity activities.
Treatment SatisfactionAt 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12 weeks (i.e. following completion of the intervention phase)Children will complete the valid and reliable 16-item Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PAES) to rate their experience with the intervention. The PAES includes a mix of 9 positively phrased (e.g., I enjoy it, It gives me energy, etc.) and 7 negatively phrased (e.g., I feel bored, It's no fun at all, etc.) questions that are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1: Disagree a lot, 5 - Agree a lot). The negatively coded items were reverse coded and an average total score across all items was calculated. The PAES total score ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater levels of enjoyment with training activities.
Perceived Satisfaction With InterventionAt 12 weeks (i.e. following completion of the intervention and control phases each lasting for 6 weeks)Children and caregivers will fill out exit questionnaires to assess training satisfaction, enjoyment, repeatability, and caregiver burden.
Ease of Implementation of TrainingAt 12 weeks (i.e. following completion of the intervention and control phases each lasting for 6 weeks)Trainers will fill out posttest exit questionnaires to assess ease of implementation of the training program.
Changes in Treatment Fidelity Across Training WeeksEarly (week 1), Mid (week 3), and late (week 6) training sessions within the 6-week intervention phaseAn unbiased coder randomly coded video data (one each of early, mid, and late sessions) from researcher-delivered sessions within the intervention phase using a fidelity checklist to assess adherence to the training protocol. A 159-item fidelity checklist (total possible score: 159) specific to the training program was used for scoring treatment fidelity. Each item was rated on scale of 0 to 1, where 0 meant that the criterion was not satisfied and 1 meant that the fidelity criterion was satisfied. The total scores on the checklist could range from 0 to 159. We calculated a percent fidelity score by dividing the total score received by the total possible score (i.e., 159) and then multiplied this value by 100.
Changes in Toy Use (in Minutes/Week) Across Training WeeksFrom start to end of 6-week intervention phase on a weekly basisSensors mounted on the toy will collect data on amount of use (in minutes/week) of the toy during training weeks. We will assess toy use on a weekly basis across the training period.
Change in Affected Arm Movement ControlBaseline, at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)The Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST) is a criterion-referenced, valid, and reliable measure for use between 18 months-12 years to assesses quality of UE function in 4 domains: dissociated movement, grasp, protective extension, and weight bearing. The tool includes 36 items that evaluate movement patterns and hand function in children with CP and are scored on a dichotomous scale. Scores for each sub-domain and the total score are calculated as percentages. The total QUEST score was calculated by summing scores for each sub-domain tested divided by the total number of sub-domains tested. The total scores on the QUEST range from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent better quality of movement.
Changes in Use of Affected Arm in Functional ActivitiesBaseline, at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)The Shriner's Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation (SHUEE) is a video-based assessment designed to assess spontaneous use and dynamic segmental alignment of the affected UE during functional tasks in children with hemiplegic CP between 3 and 18 years. The SHUEE includes 16 bimanual tasks. Of these 16 tasks, to assess the child's actual function of the affected UE a spontaneous use score is calculated during performance of 9 out of the 16 tasks. This Spontaneous Functional Analysis (SFA) score per task is rated on a scale of 0 to 5, where higher values indicate more spontaneous use of the affected UE. We summed the SFA scores across all 9 tasks, divided this sum by the total possible score, and then multiplied this value by 100 to express SFA as a percentage of normal or optimal score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Amount of Trainer Assistance Needed During NavigationEarly (week 1), mid (week 3), and late (week 6) training sessions within the 6-week intervention phaseEarly, mid, & late training sessions will be coded for % duration of assisted (child needs trainer-provided manual assistance) versus independent navigation.
Changes in Child Attention During Training SessionsEarly (week 1), mid (week 3), and late (week 6) sessions during the 6-week intervention phaseTraining sessions (one early, mid, and late session each) will be video-coded for attention (i.e., % duration of attention to task-relevant targets).
Changes in Child Affect Across Training SessionsEarly (week 1), mid (week 3), and late (week 6) sessions during the 6-week intervention phaseTraining sessions (one early, mid, and late session each) will be video-coded for child affect (i.e., smile rates, % duration of positive/interested and negative affect)
Changes in the Duration of Movement Bouts During Navigation Across Testing SessionsBaseline, at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)The path navigation test will be coded for the average duration of child-initiated, movement bouts normalized by driving time (a bout comprises 1 acceleration and 1 deceleration phase).
Changes in Rates of Obstacle Contacts Across Testing SessionsBaseline, at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)The path navigation test will be coded for the number of times the child bumps/crashes against obstacles during the navigation. We will report on the number of such bumps/crashes per minute of navigation time. Higher values of this variable indicate worse performance (poor navigational control).
Changes in Rates of Path Deviations Across Testing SessionsBaseline, at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)The path navigation test will involve children navigating through paths that are clearly demarcated using tape/chalk. We counted the number of times per minute that children went outside the demarcated path during the navigation test. Higher values of this variable indicate worse performance (poor navigational control).
Changes in Parent-rated Scores on Functional Use of the Affected ArmBaseline, at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)The ABILHAND-Kids is a valid and reliable parent-rated questionnaire assessing parent perceptions of their child's level of ease or difficulty in performing 21 manual activities independently over the last 3 months. The questionnaire has been validated as a measure of manual ability for 6-16-year-old children with CP. The 21 manual activities are rated by parents on a 3-point scale of impossible (given a score of 0), difficult (given a score of 1), or easy (given a score of 2). ABILHAND score is expressed in logits, resulting from the conversion of the ordinal raw score into a linear measure of ability located on a unidimensional scale. The logit is a linear unit that expresses the odds of success of the patient on any given item. This unit is constant throughout the measurement scale. The manual ability scale is, by convention, centered on the average item difficulty (0 logit), the scale ranging from -6.75 to 6.68, with higher scores indicating better manual abilities.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation Training
Participants will first participate in a 6-week control phase followed by a 6-week intervention phase. During the intervention phase, they will receive the ride-on-toy navigation training program. The training will be provided by the researchers twice a week, 30-45 minutes/session for 6 weeks. Caregivers will be asked to provide 2 additional sessions/week during the intervention phase. In this study design, the participants will serve as their own controls.
15
Total15

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSingle Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation Training
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
15 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
Age, Continuous5.92 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.25
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Affected Arm Movement Control

The Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST) is a criterion-referenced, valid, and reliable measure for use between 18 months-12 years to assesses quality of UE function in 4 domains: dissociated movement, grasp, protective extension, and weight bearing. The tool includes 36 items that evaluate movement patterns and hand function in children with CP and are scored on a dichotomous scale. Scores for each sub-domain and the total score are calculated as percentages. The total QUEST score was calculated by summing scores for each sub-domain tested divided by the total number of sub-domains tested. The total scores on the QUEST range from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent better quality of movement.

Time frame: Baseline, at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChange in Affected Arm Movement ControlBaseline74.9 percentageStandard Error 3.1
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChange in Affected Arm Movement Control6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase)78.3 percentageStandard Error 3.5
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChange in Affected Arm Movement Control12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)83.8 percentageStandard Error 2.2
Primary

Changes in Habitual Arm Activity on the Affected Side

We will provide children with the Actigraph wrist activity monitors that can be worn like a wristwatch. Children will be asked to wear 2 wrist monitors, one each on both wrists, at 6 timepoints: (a) for one week at the pretest, (b) for one week at mid-point assessment, (c) during first week of training, (d) during last week of training, and (e) for one week at posttest. Children will be provided 2 watches during the pretest visit and they will be requested to wear the watches on both wrists for the next 1 week prior to the start of the training program. Children will be asked to wear the monitor continuously when awake and while sleeping for a minimum of 4 days - 1 weekend day and 3 weekdays.

Time frame: Baseline, at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Habitual Arm Activity on the Affected SideBaseline48.4 %time Mod-Vig Activity of Affected SideStandard Error 4.3
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Habitual Arm Activity on the Affected Sideat 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase)50.9 %time Mod-Vig Activity of Affected SideStandard Error 5
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Habitual Arm Activity on the Affected Sideat 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)50.4 %time Mod-Vig Activity of Affected SideStandard Error 3.5
Primary

Changes in Kinematic Measures of Movement Control on the Affected Arm

Data will be collected during a unilateral and bilateral reach-grasp task at self-selected speed involving different objects (foam ball, rattle, and square block) placed at half arm's length (near) and at arm's length (far) on the table. Sensors (Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs)) will be placed on both hands, both forearms, both arms, and the C7 spinous process. We will assess range of motion of joints during upper extremity activities.

Time frame: at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Kinematic Measures of Movement Control on the Affected ArmOverhead shoulder ROM at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase)113.69 degreesStandard Error 6.53
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Kinematic Measures of Movement Control on the Affected ArmOverhead shoulder ROM at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)123.93 degreesStandard Error 7.47
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Kinematic Measures of Movement Control on the Affected ArmElbow ROM at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase)112.68 degreesStandard Error 7.53
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Kinematic Measures of Movement Control on the Affected ArmElbow ROM at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)132.59 degreesStandard Error 7.08
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Kinematic Measures of Movement Control on the Affected ArmWrist Sagittal ROM at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase)58.72 degreesStandard Error 13.8
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Kinematic Measures of Movement Control on the Affected ArmWrist Sagittal ROM at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)69.78 degreesStandard Error 16.59
Primary

Changes in Toy Use (in Minutes/Week) Across Training Weeks

Sensors mounted on the toy will collect data on amount of use (in minutes/week) of the toy during training weeks. We will assess toy use on a weekly basis across the training period.

Time frame: From start to end of 6-week intervention phase on a weekly basis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Toy Use (in Minutes/Week) Across Training WeeksWeek 1 Duration34.3 minutesStandard Error 3.6
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Toy Use (in Minutes/Week) Across Training WeeksWeek 2 Duration41.5 minutesStandard Error 5.7
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Toy Use (in Minutes/Week) Across Training WeeksWeek 3 Duration44.2 minutesStandard Error 5.1
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Toy Use (in Minutes/Week) Across Training WeeksWeek 4 Duration40.4 minutesStandard Error 4.1
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Toy Use (in Minutes/Week) Across Training WeeksWeek 5 Duration38.5 minutesStandard Error 5.5
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Toy Use (in Minutes/Week) Across Training WeeksWeek 6 Duration60.4 minutesStandard Error 9.7
Primary

Changes in Treatment Fidelity Across Training Weeks

An unbiased coder randomly coded video data (one each of early, mid, and late sessions) from researcher-delivered sessions within the intervention phase using a fidelity checklist to assess adherence to the training protocol. A 159-item fidelity checklist (total possible score: 159) specific to the training program was used for scoring treatment fidelity. Each item was rated on scale of 0 to 1, where 0 meant that the criterion was not satisfied and 1 meant that the fidelity criterion was satisfied. The total scores on the checklist could range from 0 to 159. We calculated a percent fidelity score by dividing the total score received by the total possible score (i.e., 159) and then multiplied this value by 100.

Time frame: Early (week 1), Mid (week 3), and late (week 6) training sessions within the 6-week intervention phase

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Treatment Fidelity Across Training WeeksEarly (week 1)95.1 percentage of total possible scoreStandard Error 0.7
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Treatment Fidelity Across Training WeeksMid (week 3)96.1 percentage of total possible scoreStandard Error 0.4
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Treatment Fidelity Across Training WeeksLate (week 6)95.6 percentage of total possible scoreStandard Error 0.7
Primary

Changes in Use of Affected Arm in Functional Activities

The Shriner's Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation (SHUEE) is a video-based assessment designed to assess spontaneous use and dynamic segmental alignment of the affected UE during functional tasks in children with hemiplegic CP between 3 and 18 years. The SHUEE includes 16 bimanual tasks. Of these 16 tasks, to assess the child's actual function of the affected UE a spontaneous use score is calculated during performance of 9 out of the 16 tasks. This Spontaneous Functional Analysis (SFA) score per task is rated on a scale of 0 to 5, where higher values indicate more spontaneous use of the affected UE. We summed the SFA scores across all 9 tasks, divided this sum by the total possible score, and then multiplied this value by 100 to express SFA as a percentage of normal or optimal score.

Time frame: Baseline, at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Use of Affected Arm in Functional ActivitiesBaseline52.3 percentage of normal or optimal scoreStandard Error 3.4
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Use of Affected Arm in Functional Activities6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase)53.3 percentage of normal or optimal scoreStandard Error 3.4
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Use of Affected Arm in Functional Activities12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)60.7 percentage of normal or optimal scoreStandard Error 3.1
Primary

Ease of Implementation of Training

Trainers will fill out posttest exit questionnaires to assess ease of implementation of the training program.

Time frame: At 12 weeks (i.e. following completion of the intervention and control phases each lasting for 6 weeks)

Population: child and caregiver

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingEase of Implementation of Trainingnumber of children wanting to repeat RNT14 Participants
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingEase of Implementation of Trainingnumber of caregivers reporting some difficulty in independently delivering RNT9 Participants
Primary

# of Training Sessions Completed Assessed Using Training Logs

Researchers will also maintain training logs during the intervention phase to document # of training sessions completed out of the total possible sessions (12).

Time frame: From start to end of 6-week intervention phase on a weekly basis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation Training# of Training Sessions Completed Assessed Using Training Logs98.33 percentage of sessions attendedStandard Error 1.21
Primary

Perceived Satisfaction With Intervention

Children and caregivers will fill out exit questionnaires to assess training satisfaction, enjoyment, repeatability, and caregiver burden.

Time frame: At 12 weeks (i.e. following completion of the intervention and control phases each lasting for 6 weeks)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingPerceived Satisfaction With Interventionnumber of children reporting high enjoyment12 Participants
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingPerceived Satisfaction With Interventionnumber of caregivers agreeing RNT is overall beneficial15 Participants
Primary

Treatment Satisfaction

Children will complete the valid and reliable 16-item Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PAES) to rate their experience with the intervention. The PAES includes a mix of 9 positively phrased (e.g., I enjoy it, It gives me energy, etc.) and 7 negatively phrased (e.g., I feel bored, It's no fun at all, etc.) questions that are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1: Disagree a lot, 5 - Agree a lot). The negatively coded items were reverse coded and an average total score across all items was calculated. The PAES total score ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater levels of enjoyment with training activities.

Time frame: At 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12 weeks (i.e. following completion of the intervention phase)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingTreatment Satisfaction12 weeks (i.e. following completion of the intervention phase)3.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingTreatment Satisfaction6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase)3.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Secondary

Changes in Amount of Trainer Assistance Needed During Navigation

Early, mid, & late training sessions will be coded for % duration of assisted (child needs trainer-provided manual assistance) versus independent navigation.

Time frame: Early (week 1), mid (week 3), and late (week 6) training sessions within the 6-week intervention phase

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Amount of Trainer Assistance Needed During NavigationEarly (week 1)73.4 %session spent in independent navigationStandard Error 4.3
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Amount of Trainer Assistance Needed During NavigationMid (week 3)88.7 %session spent in independent navigationStandard Error 3.3
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Amount of Trainer Assistance Needed During NavigationLate (week 6)95.4 %session spent in independent navigationStandard Error 1.7
Secondary

Changes in Child Affect Across Training Sessions

Training sessions (one early, mid, and late session each) will be video-coded for child affect (i.e., smile rates, % duration of positive/interested and negative affect)

Time frame: Early (week 1), mid (week 3), and late (week 6) sessions during the 6-week intervention phase

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Child Affect Across Training SessionsEarly (week 1)98.1 % duration in positive/interested affectStandard Error 1.1
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Child Affect Across Training SessionsMid (week 3)99.3 % duration in positive/interested affectStandard Error 0.4
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Child Affect Across Training SessionsLate (week 6)98.9 % duration in positive/interested affectStandard Error 0.5
Secondary

Changes in Child Attention During Training Sessions

Training sessions (one early, mid, and late session each) will be video-coded for attention (i.e., % duration of attention to task-relevant targets).

Time frame: Early (week 1), mid (week 3), and late (week 6) sessions during the 6-week intervention phase

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Child Attention During Training SessionsEarly (week 1)80.7 % duration of attention to task targetsStandard Error 1.6
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Child Attention During Training SessionsMid (week 3)83.9 % duration of attention to task targetsStandard Error 1.8
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Child Attention During Training SessionsLate (week 6)83.4 % duration of attention to task targetsStandard Error 1.4
Secondary

Changes in Parent-rated Scores on Functional Use of the Affected Arm

The ABILHAND-Kids is a valid and reliable parent-rated questionnaire assessing parent perceptions of their child's level of ease or difficulty in performing 21 manual activities independently over the last 3 months. The questionnaire has been validated as a measure of manual ability for 6-16-year-old children with CP. The 21 manual activities are rated by parents on a 3-point scale of impossible (given a score of 0), difficult (given a score of 1), or easy (given a score of 2). ABILHAND score is expressed in logits, resulting from the conversion of the ordinal raw score into a linear measure of ability located on a unidimensional scale. The logit is a linear unit that expresses the odds of success of the patient on any given item. This unit is constant throughout the measurement scale. The manual ability scale is, by convention, centered on the average item difficulty (0 logit), the scale ranging from -6.75 to 6.68, with higher scores indicating better manual abilities.

Time frame: Baseline, at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Parent-rated Scores on Functional Use of the Affected ArmBaseline0.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Parent-rated Scores on Functional Use of the Affected Arm6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase)0.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Parent-rated Scores on Functional Use of the Affected Arm12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)1.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Secondary

Changes in Rates of Obstacle Contacts Across Testing Sessions

The path navigation test will be coded for the number of times the child bumps/crashes against obstacles during the navigation. We will report on the number of such bumps/crashes per minute of navigation time. Higher values of this variable indicate worse performance (poor navigational control).

Time frame: Baseline, at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Rates of Obstacle Contacts Across Testing SessionsBaseline1.4 bumps/crashes per minuteStandard Error 0.3
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Rates of Obstacle Contacts Across Testing Sessions6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase)1.8 bumps/crashes per minuteStandard Error 0.3
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Rates of Obstacle Contacts Across Testing Sessions12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)0.5 bumps/crashes per minuteStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Changes in Rates of Path Deviations Across Testing Sessions

The path navigation test will involve children navigating through paths that are clearly demarcated using tape/chalk. We counted the number of times per minute that children went outside the demarcated path during the navigation test. Higher values of this variable indicate worse performance (poor navigational control).

Time frame: Baseline, at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Rates of Path Deviations Across Testing SessionsBaseline2.2 path deviations per minuteStandard Error 0.2
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Rates of Path Deviations Across Testing Sessions6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase)2.0 path deviations per minuteStandard Error 0.1
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in Rates of Path Deviations Across Testing Sessions12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)1.2 path deviations per minuteStandard Error 0.4
Secondary

Changes in the Duration of Movement Bouts During Navigation Across Testing Sessions

The path navigation test will be coded for the average duration of child-initiated, movement bouts normalized by driving time (a bout comprises 1 acceleration and 1 deceleration phase).

Time frame: Baseline, at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in the Duration of Movement Bouts During Navigation Across Testing SessionsBaseline31.2 Bout Rate (bouts/min)Standard Error 3.7
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in the Duration of Movement Bouts During Navigation Across Testing Sessions6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase)27.7 Bout Rate (bouts/min)Standard Error 4.2
Single Joystick Ride-on-car Navigation TrainingChanges in the Duration of Movement Bouts During Navigation Across Testing Sessions12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)14.8 Bout Rate (bouts/min)Standard Error 3.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026