Skip to content

The Impact of a Novel Coaching Program on Medical Errors and Well-Being of Physicians

A Randomized Controlled Trial on The Impact of a Novel Coaching Program on Medical Errors, Clinical Reasoning, and Well-Being of Physicians, or the CARE (Coaching to Advance Resilience and Reduce Error) Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05557981
Acronym
CARE
Enrollment
332
Registered
2022-09-28
Start date
2021-08-10
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2024-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adverse Event, Burnout, Medical Education

Keywords

Coaching, burnout, wellness, medical errors

Brief summary

This is a randomized controlled trial with a mixed method design to determine the impact of coaching on self-perceived medical errors, burnout, and resilience. The study team developed a novel coaching curriculum based in principles of positive psychology and self-reflection with the hypothesis that the coaching intervention will lead to decreased medical errors, decreased burnout, and increased resilience in trainee and faculty participants. Resident and fellow trainees as well as faculty members were recruited across departments and randomized to coaching or control. Faculty in the coaching arm were trained in coaching techniques and paired with a trainee coachee. Survey results as well as focus groups will be used to analyze the impact of the coaching program as compared to standard mentorship (control).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCoaching

A novel coaching curriculum based in positive psychology with an emphasis on self-reflection, goal setting and adverse event processing.

Sponsors

Harvard Risk Management Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Residents and fellows in a training program at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) * faculty members at BIDMC

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Medical errors in traineesbaseline (pre) compared to results at the end (post) of the coaching intervention, an average of 9 monthsSelf-perceived medical errors amongst trainees based on survey response.
Burnoutbaseline (pre) compared to results at the end (post) of the coaching intervention, an average of 9 monthsBurnout score amongst trainees and faculty based on Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index
Resiliencebaseline (pre) compared to results at the end (post) of the coaching intervention, an average of 9 monthsBurnout score amongst trainees and faculty based on Connor Davidson Resilience Scale 2

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Delayed Medical errors in traineesup to 15 monthsSelf-perceived medical errors amongst trainees based on survey response
medical errors in facultybaseline (pre) compared to results at the end (post) of the coaching intervention, an average of 9 monthsSelf-perceived medical errors amongst faculty based on survey response. Specifically, faculty are asked Do you think you may have made any medical error in the last 3 months? A medical error is the failure of a planned action to be completed as intended, or the failure of an unplanned action that should have been completed with answer choices yes, no, and unsure.
Delayed Resiliencebaseline (beginning of study, before intervention) compared to 6 months post coaching programBurnout score amongst trainees and faculty based on Connor-Davidson-RISC2
Burnoutbaseline (beginning of study, before intervention) compared to 6 months post coaching programBurnout score amongst trainees and faculty based on Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index
delayed medical errors in facultybaseline (beginning of study, before intervention) compared to 6 months post coaching programSelf-perceived medical errors amongst faculty based on survey response
Mechanism of changeassessed an average of 1 year after intervention initiationMechanism of change in burnout, resilience and medical errors in both trainees and faculty as compared to standard mentorship

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026