Skip to content

System Constellations in Virtual Reality (VR)

Efficacy and Experience of System Constellations in Virtual Reality (VR): A Randomized Control Feasibility Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05557890
Acronym
SYSCO-VR
Enrollment
53
Registered
2022-09-28
Start date
2023-12-01
Completion date
2025-04-30
Last updated
2024-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psychological and Systems Functioning

Keywords

Systems Constellation, Virtual Reality (VR), Feasibility Study

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of system constellations in Virtual Reality (VR) in a monocentric, single-masked randomized controlled trial. The method of system constellations refers to an approach which integrates ideas from organizational and family systems counseling with elements from psychodrama. The constellations are conducted in a group based VR-seminar, each VR-seminar lasting two to three days. Based on the model of a general mental health, the effects of system constellations in VR on psychological and systems functioning are explored. It is predicted that participation in a system constellation VR-seminar changes the level of psychological and systems functioning at 4 months.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSystem Constellation VR-Seminar

individual-centered intervention in a group VR-setting, duration 2 to 3 days

Sponsors

FH Münster University of Applied Sciences
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The Witten Institute For Family Business
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Witten/Herdecke
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* agreement to participate in a 2 to 3-day system constellations VR-seminar * agreement to be randomized into treatment group or control group (waiting condition) * agreement not to participate in another system constellation VR-seminar or seminar until completion of study

Exclusion criteria

* acute suicidal tendency * acute psychotic episode * acute drug or alcohol intoxication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline EB-45 Score within 4 monthsBaseline, 2 weeks after treatment, 4 months after treatmentChanges in psychological well-being will be assessed using the 'Outcome Questionnaire' in its German version (EB-45). The EB-45 is a brief 45-item self report outcome/tracking instrument designed for repeated measurement of client progress through the course of psychotherapy and following termination. The scales of the EB-45 measure symptom distress, interpersonal functioning, and social role.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Experience in Social Systems Questionnaire (EXIS)Baseline, 2 weeks after treatment, 4 months after treatmentThe subjective quality of family and organizational systems will be assessed by the EXIS (Questionnaire on experiences in systems), a self-constructed questionnaire comprising 24 items.
Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Treatment Progress (FEP-2)Baseline, 2 weeks after treatment, 4 months after treatmentThe FEP-2, 40-item self report questionnaire, measures psychological distress according to the phase model of therapeutic change as well as the interpersonal model of psychological distress.
Bern Inventory of Psychotherapy Goals (BIT-C)Baseline, 2 weeks after treatment, 4 months after treatmentGoal achievement will be assessed using Goal Attainment Scaling as a method for the assimilation of achievement in a number of individually set goals into a single aggregated 'goal attainment score', providing a person-centred outcome, focused on that individual's priorities. Goal attainment scaling is operationalized by an open-ended question, in which study participants descriobe their individual goals. In a second step these goals will be coded according to the Bern inventory of psychotherapy goals (BIT-C)
Incongruence Questionnaire (K-INK)Baseline, 2 weeks after treatment, 4 months after treatmentMotivational incongruence is defined as the unsatisfactory realization of motivational goals and is based on the concept of General Psychotherapy by Klaus Grawe. The Incongruence Questionnaire (INK) is an instrument that assesses motivational incongruence, defined as the discrepancy between a person's motivational goals and his/her perception of reality. The short version of this questionnaire that will be used in our study (K-INK) comprises 23 items.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026