Skip to content

Pulse Control Using USG and Manual Palpation Methods in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Carotid Arteries in Pulse Control Using USG and Manual Palpation Methods in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05557032
Enrollment
536
Registered
2022-09-27
Start date
2021-12-25
Completion date
2022-09-16
Last updated
2023-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Keywords

carotid artery, pulse check, Cardiopulmonary Arrest

Brief summary

The final approach adopted in Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines as defined by the American Heart Association (AHA) and the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) is to minimize the time between chest compressions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Pulse and rhythm checks are recommended between chest compressions and it is stated that this period should not exceed 10 seconds. All guidelines also state that in cases of low cardiac output or low blood pressure, even if electrocardiographic (ECG) rhythms can be obtained, pulse checks may still fail and an arterial pulse may not be felt during chest compressions. This difficulty in sensing the arterial pulse causes delays in the decision of cardiac arrest in the patient. For this reason, there are cases of cardiac arrest in which the initiation of CPR is delayed or not started at all. The most common method for checking the pulse is manual palpation. However, since it is an operator-dependent method, it is affected by the experience of the healthcare personnel, the vital values of the patient, and anatomical differences. Therefore, more objective criteria are required to detect a pulse. A clinical study of the reliability of pulse checks showed that most healthcare professionals are unable to detect the presence or absence of a pulse. Another study showed that pulse alone is not sufficient to initiate CPR, and 50% of decisions to initiate CPR based on heart rate are incorrect. Therefore, more objective criteria have been sought to detect the presence of a pulse. For this purpose, evaluations were made regarding the presence of end-tidal carbon dioxide, cardiac echo, and organized rhythm.

Interventions

PROCEDUREcardiopulmonary resuscitation

pulse checks during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Sponsors

Izmir Katip Celebi University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All adult patients (over 18 years of age) with in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with traumatic arrest * Conditions affecting carotid pulse palpation and/or USG application (patients with a history of carotid stenosis or dissection, patients undergoing neck surgery, patients with neck abscess hematoma) * Pregnant arrest patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Carotid artery pulse control result using manual and USG in cardiopulmonary resuscitation2 minuteOur aim is to compare the USG and manual methods in evaluating the presence of a pulse during CPR and to determine which method gives the most appropriate time and accuracy.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026