Comparing Between Two Different Restoration

Clinical Performance of Lithium Disilicate Versus Hybrid Resin Ceramic for Inlay and Onlay Restoration After 3 Years Follow up

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT05556551

Enrollment

Registered

2022-09-27

Start date

2019-05-20

Completion date

2022-07-20

Last updated

2022-09-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Restoration Failure

Brief summary

Clinical performance of two different ceramic restoration in patient mouth after 3 years follow up

Detailed description

Comparing two different dental restoration in patient mouth after 3 years follow up by using USPHS criteria

Interventions

OTHERFull Ceramic restoration

Two different dental restoration inserted in patient mouth ( split mouth)

OTHERHybrid resin Ceramic restoration

Hybrid resin Ceramic restoration

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Different restoration inserted in the patient mouth

Intervention model description

Two different restorations in patient mouth

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

20 Years to 50 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* good oral hygiene

Exclusion criteria

* bad oral hygiene

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Evaluation of two different restoration	3 years	Using (USPHS) criteria

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026