Skip to content

Comparing Two Mandibular Positioning Techniques for Dental Sleep Appliances

Two Cohort Prospective Single Blinded Patient Crossover Trial Comparing Anterior Protrusive and Sibilant Phoneme Mandibular Positioning Techniques for Dental Sleep Appliances

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05553860
Enrollment
11
Registered
2022-09-23
Start date
2021-12-05
Completion date
2025-12-03
Last updated
2026-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Occlusal Splints, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

Brief summary

This is a prospective study that directly compares the use of speech vs an anterior protrusive technique for mandibular positioning.

Detailed description

Obstructive sleep apnea is a medical condition where a person has great difficulty with breathing, or stops breathing all together, while asleep. This is a medical condition for which one of the current standard treatments is the use of a custom-made dental appliance to help hold the person's airway open while asleep so that the person does not suffocate while sleeping. Current methodology within dentistry is to position the mandible based on the person's maximum ability to position their mandible forward as the starting point and then slowly move the bottom jaw forward as necessary. Recent literature has shown that different mandibular positioning techniques may require less protrusion, less titrations, and potentially decreased side effects compared with the traditional protrusive techniques. One of the most promising techniques involves the use of speech to determine mandibular position. This technique would not require that a patient place their jaw outside of their normal functional range and could potentially decrease the face pain/jaw joint problems commonly associated with the use of oral sleep appliances for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. The use of speech as the determinant for where to position the mandible is important for muscular balance. Minimal research has been done in this area, with most studies being either retrospective or confounded by other variables. This will be the first prospective study that directly compares the use of speech vs an anterior protrusive technique for mandibular positioning.

Interventions

OTHERSpeech positioning technique

Speech positioning technique

Sponsors

University of Alberta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Patient diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea, and * Prescription/order for a dental sleep appliance * 18 years or older * Treatment planned in accordance with AADSM treatment guidelines

Exclusion criteria

* There are no separate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)3 monthsMeasurement to determine whether both mandibular positioning techniques provide similar management of obstructive sleep apnea

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overjet3 monthsMeasurement to determine whether there is a significant difference in final treatment mandibular position between the positioning techniques.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOREnoch Ng, DDS

University of Alberta

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026