COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
Conditions
Keywords
Activity, Automated oxygen titration, ADL, long term oxygen treatment
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of automated oxygen titration compared to the usual fixed dose oxygen on the patient's ability to perform activities of daily living.
Detailed description
The patient's ability to perform ADL assessed by the Glittre-ADL test with automatic oxygen titration compared to usual fixed dose will be examined. The patients will be invited to a visit at one of the participating hospitals. The Glittre-ADL will be performed according to the protocol validated by Skumlien et al. The first test is performed for familiarization in order to avoid a learning effect in the primary tests. The patients will use the fixed-dose oxygen, established after titration to a SpO2 of 90-94 % at rest. After the familiarization test and gathering of demographics, further two Glittre-ADL tests will be performed on the same day or at another day pending on patient preference. In random order the patients will use A) automated oxygen titration set at an SpO2-target of 90 to 94 % and an oxygen flow of 0 - 8 liters/min and B) their usual fixed dose of oxygen. In both arms O2matic will monitor pulse rate and saturation continuously during the test, but only in the automated oxygen therapy arm O2matic adjusts the oxygen flow. The patients will all use a rollator as walking aid. The oxygen equipment will be placed in the rollator and the tests will be conducted without the steps (due to the use of rollator). The minimum interval between tests will be 20 minutes or until the vital values and symptoms are returned to baseline. Before, and after the Glittre-ADL, the patients will be asked the rate their level of dyspnea using Borg Dyspnea Scale. Study Analysis Plan 1. Paired sample t-test: time used in the Glittre test using AutOx vs Time used using Fixed oxygen (in seconds) 2. Paired sample t-test: Borg score after Glittre using Autox vs Borg score after Glittre when using Fixed oxygen (on a scale from 0-10) A test for carryover effect will be performed by comparing the first and the second tests before being divided into the Autox and fixed oxygen groups. Variables will be examined for normality and analyzed with either a paired t-test (in case of normality) or Wilcoxon-signed-rank test (in case of non-normality). The median of the differences between tests will be used for a value. The number of patients who reach a Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in either the Dyspnea score or in time used in the Glittre test will be reported. Difference in time spent within saturation intervals will be extracted from the CSV files and combined using Excel. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, ver. 29.0.1.0 will be used for all statistical analyses.
Interventions
OTHERAutomated oxygen titration based on the oxygen saturation during activity
A device will be used, which automatically adjusts the oxygen flow to the dosage necessary for keeping the saturation at the recommended level (90-94%). If the saturation falls below 90%, oxygen flow will increase, and if the saturation increases above 94%, oxygen flow decreases in order to stay on target.
Sponsors
Örebro University, Sweden
University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg
Hvidovre University Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The patient will be blinded for the oxygen supply. An independent person will prepare the oxygen setup with usual fixed dose or automated titration. The setup i covered. The assessor conducting the tests is blinded.
Intervention model description
multicentre double blinded randomized crossover trial
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Verified history of COPD with FEV1/FVC \< 0.70 and FEV1 \< 50 % * Hypoxemic at rest (SpO2≤ 90 %) and fulfilment of general national criteria for LTOT * Partial pressure of Oxygen (PaO2) (without oxygen supplement) ≤7.3 kPa in clinically stable and optimally treated condition * Increase in PaO2 after oxygen supplementation (to 8.0-9.0 kPa) without decrease in arterial pH (\> 0.03 kPa) * The oxygen is used at least 15 hours daily (optimally 24 hours daily) * The treatment is handled by hospital departments with lung medical expertise. * Able to walk at least 30 meters * Age \>18, Cognitively able to participate in the study and willing to give informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Pulmonary or cardiac condition other than COPD limiting physical performance * Unstable heart condition or stenotic aortic valve disease * A physical condition including paralysis, lower extremity pain, or back problem limiting physical performance * Exacerbation in COPD treated with either antibiotics or prednisolone within the last 3 weeks
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time used for the Glittre-ADL test | Immediately after intervention (control arm test and automated oxygen titration arm) on the same day | Change in time used to complete the Glittre-ADL test with automated titration compared to fixed-dose treatment |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Saturation | Immediately after the intervention | Change in time spent within acceptable SpO2-interval (SpO2 90 - 94 %) and time spent with moderate hypoxemia (SpO2 \< 88 %) and severe hypoxemia (SpO2 \< 85 %) in the two Glittre-ADL tests |
| Oxygen consumption | Immediately after the intervention | Change in average oxygen consumption between the two tests |
| Dyspnea | Immediately after the intervention | Change in Dyspnea Borg (in units from 0-10) scores after performing Glittre ADL test between arms |
Countries
Denmark
Outcome results
None listed