Skip to content

Drainless Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

Drainless Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05553795
Acronym
RESPECT
Enrollment
49
Registered
2022-09-23
Start date
2023-04-19
Completion date
2024-05-21
Last updated
2024-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Cancer

Keywords

Esophagectomy, Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS), Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE)

Brief summary

The aim of this study is the evaluation of two different chest drain management strategies in patients undergoing robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer with regard to perioperative complications until discharge.The primary objective of the study is to investigate whether the intensity of postoperative pain can be significantly reduced by avoiding thoracic drains after RAMIE. We assume that this will influence secondary endpoints such as early recovery and length of hospital stay.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEarly removal of chest drain

Chest drains are removed 3 hours after the end of surgery in absence of contraindications in arm A.

PROCEDUREChest drain

The chest drains in arm B are removed during the further postoperative course according to standard algorithm.

Sponsors

German Cancer Research Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Technische Universität Dresden
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled multicentric trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients scheduled for elective RAMIE for esophageal cancer with intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy (Ivor-Lewis) * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≤ III * Eastern Cooperative of Oncology Group (ECOG) status ≤ II * Patient suitable for both surgical techniques * Ability of subject to understand character and individual consequences of the clinical trial * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Open esophagectomy (either abdominal or during the thoracic part) * Emergency operations * ASA IV * ECOG \> II * Chronic pain syndromes requiring routine analgesics * Simultaneous lung resection * Presence of contraindications to the use of epidural anesthesia (e.g. coagulopathies, anticoagulation or allergies) * Participation in an interventional trial, which interferes with the outcome * Impaired mental state

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative painDay 2 after surgeryPostoperative pain according to a numeric rating scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Additional analgesic drug useDay 4 after surgeryopioids \[mg\], non-opioids \[mg\]
Postoperative mobilizationDay 7 after surgerysteps per day as measured with an activity tracker
Mean postoperative painDay 4 after surgeryPostoperative pain according to a numeric rating scale
Postoperative mortalityThrough hospital stay, an average of 14 daysThe postoperative mortality of all patients is assessed between operation date and date of death of any cause during hospital stay
Daily postoperative painDay 7 after surgeryPostoperative pain according to a numeric rating scale measured daily from postoperative day 1-7
Postoperative morbidityThrough hospital stay, an average of 14 daysThe postoperative morbidity of all patients is assessed with the comprehensive complication index based on Clavien Dindo classification from postoperative day 1 until day of discharge

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026