Skip to content

Virtual Reality for Pain in Acute Orthopedic Injuries

Physical and Psychological Measures of Pain in Acute Orthopedic Injuries: Use of At-home Virtual Reality

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05552430
Enrollment
10
Registered
2022-09-23
Start date
2022-10-17
Completion date
2023-10-12
Last updated
2024-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Injuries, Injury, Ankle, Injury Arm, Injury Finger, Injury Foot, Injury, Hand, Injury, Knee, Injury Leg, Injury;Sports, Injury Wrist

Keywords

pain, disability, injury, orthopedics, rehabilitation, mind-body

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to pilot test a skills-based virtual reality (VR) for acute orthopedic injury. It will measure the feasibility, signals of improvement, exploratory pain mechanisms, and user experience of an established skills-based program (RelieveVRx) for acute orthopedic injury.

Detailed description

This study will use mixed-methods to investigate the feasibility of skills-based virtual reality (VR) for acute orthopedic injury in an open pilot with individual exit interviews (target N=10). Participants will be patients with acute orthopedic musculoskeletal injuries who are at risk for chronic pain and disability (PCS ≥ 20 and PASS-20 ≥ 40) and meet inclusionary/exclusionary criteria. Participants will be recruited through the MGH Orthopedics Department, flyers, and the Rally research platform. Participants will self-administer a skills-based virtual reality (VR) program at home over an 8-week period. Participants will attend two in-person study assessments to complete study assessments (surveys and an fNIRS imaging session). The primary outcome for the pilot will be a-priori Go/No-Go feasibility markers (feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, credibility, expectancy, satisfaction) of the VR program and data collection procedures to increase the success of subsequent trials. Exploratory measures include: multi-modal assessment of pain intensity, pain-specific coping (catastrophizing, self-efficacy, acceptance), disability, physical function, and emotional function (depression, anxiety, stress). The VR headset will collect usage data and daily smartphone surveys will track changes in pain during the 8-week intervention. Completers will have the opportunity to attend 30 min individual exit interviews to understand patients' perception of the VR and their experience with the study procedures to increase the success of larger trials.

Interventions

DEVICERelieveVRx

Participants will complete daily skills-based Virtual Reality (VR) sessions for 8 weeks (an average of 6 minutes per day) to determine the feasibility of at-home VR technology to aid the recovery of acute orthopedic musculoskeletal injuries. The VR device software is equipped with pain-specific treatment modules (e.g., Pain Education, Relaxation/Interoception, Mindful Escapes, and Pain Distraction Games) derived from evidence-based principles of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), mindfulness, and pain neuroscience education.

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Outpatient adults in the Level 1 Trauma Center 2. Age 18 or older 3. Able to meaningfully participate meaningfully (English fluency and literacy) and stable living situation 4. Acute musculoskeletal injury (e.g., fracture, dislocation, rupture) 1-2 months earlier (acute phase). 5. Pain Catastrophizing Scale ≥20 or Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale-20 ≥40 6. Has access to internet (Wi-Fi or wireless) 7. Willing to participate and comply with the requirements of the study protocol, including virtual reality program and questionnaire completion No psychotropics or stable for \>6 weeks 8. Free of concurrent psychotropic medication for at least 2 weeks prior to initiation of treatment, OR stable on current psychotropic medication for a minimum of 6 weeks and willing to maintain a stable dose (i.e., no psychotropics or stable for \>6 weeks) 9. Cleared by orthopedic surgeon for study participation

Exclusion criteria

1. Current or prior diagnosis of epilepsy, seizure disorder, dementia, migraines, or other neurological diseases that are contraindicated for VR 2. Medical condition predisposing to nausea or dizziness. 3. Hypersensitivity to flashing light or motion. 4. Vision or severe hearing impairment. 5. Injury to eyes, face, or neck that impedes comfortable use of virtual reality 6. Diagnosed with a medical illness expected to worsen in the next 3 months (e.g., malignancy) 7. Other serious injuries that occurred with the orthopedic injury or surgical complications (e.g., infection, need for repeat surgery) 8. Current or prior untreated mental illness, substance use disorder, or suicidal ideation 9. Self-reported pregnancy 10. Currently in litigation or under Workman's Comp 11. Practice of cognitive-behavioral therapy, yoga/meditation, or other mind body techniques once per week for 45 minutes or more within the last 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)- Credibility SubscalePre-intervention (week 0) onlyParticipants' perceived credibility, determined by the percentage of participants with scores (range = 3-27, higher scores mean better outcomes) over the scale's midpoint (≥70% good, ≥ 80% excellent).
Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)- Expectancy SubscalePre-intervention (week 0) onlyParticipants' treatment expectancy, determined by the percentage of participants with scores (range = 3-27, higher scores mean better outcomes) over the scale's midpoint (≥70% good, ≥ 80% excellent).
Client Satisfaction QuestionnairePost-intervention (week 8) onlyParticipants' treatment satisfaction, determined by the percentage of participants with scores (range = 3-12) over the scale's midpoint (≥70% good, ≥ 80% excellent).
System Usability ScalePost-intervention (week 8) onlyAssess global user experience of the VR device, with higher percentile rankings (range = 0-100) indicating greater usability. Usability was determined by the number of participants with System Usability Scale scores 68 and above (≥70% good, ≥ 80% excellent).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence to Pain SurveysPre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)Adherence to Pain Surveys was determined by the percentage of participants who responded to at least 5/7 days for at least 6/8 weeks during the intervention period (≥70% good, ≥80% excellent).
Patient's Global Impression of ChangePost-intervention (week 8) onlyThe number of participants that improved much or very much or minimally on the Patient's Global Impression of Change Scores for pain, emotional, and physical function during the VR program.
Feasibility of Outcome AssessmentsPre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)The feasibility of data collection was determined by the percentage of participants with no missing outcomes data (≥70% good, ≥80% excellent).
Motion Sickness and NauseaPost-intervention (week 8) onlyAssess adverse experiences with VR, determined by the percentage of participants with responses (range = 0 never to 3 always) below the scale's midpoint (≥70% good, ≥ 80% excellent).
Feasibility of EnrollmentThroughout the study completion, approximately 1 yearWe will report the number of participants who agree to participate out of those eligible, evaluated at the end of study for all participants (≥70% good, ≥ 80% excellent).
Acceptability of TreatmentPre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)Acceptability of treatment was determined by the percentage of participants who completed at least 6 of 8 weeks of VR modules (≥70%, good; ≥ 80% excellent).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Center for Epidemiologic Study of Depression (CESD) ScalePre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20-item self-report that assesses how often participants' experience symptoms of depression in the last week. CES-D items are scored on a 0 (rarely or none of the time, less than 1 day) to 3 (most or all of the time, 5-7 days) scale. Higher scores (range = 0-60) indicate greater depressive symptoms.
Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS)Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)The Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale - Revised (CAMS-R) is a 12-item self-report that measures mindfulness principles: attention regulation, present focus, awareness, and non-judgmental awareness. CAMS-R items are scored on a 1 (rarely/not at all) to 4 (almost always) scale. Higher total scores (range = 12-48) indicate greater use of mindfulness.
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) - Activity SubscaleAssessed Pre-intervention (week 0), Bi-weekly, Post-intervention (week 8). Pre-intervention (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 8) reported.The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a 4-item self-report that measures the extent to which pain interferes with usual activity, sleep, mood, and stress. One of four DVPRS (Activity Subscale) reported and scored on 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) scale.
Non-narcotic Pain MedicationsPre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)Number of days that non-narcotic pain medications were taken in the last week.
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) - Mood SubscaleAssessed Pre-intervention (week 0), Bi-weekly, Post-intervention (week 8). Pre-intervention (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 8) reported.The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a 4-item self-report that measures the extent to which pain interferes with usual activity, sleep, mood, and stress. One of four DVPRS (Mood Subscale) reported and scored on 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) scale.
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) - Stress SubscaleAssessed Pre-intervention (week 0), Bi-weekly, Post-intervention (week 8). Pre-intervention (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 8) reported.The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a 4-item self-report that measures the extent to which pain interferes with usual activity, sleep, mood, and stress. One of four DVPRS (Stress Subscale) reported and scored is scored on 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) scale.
Measure of Current Status (MOCS)Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)The Measure of Current Status (MOCS) is a 13-item self-report of the ability to use various skills to cope with daily stressors. MOCS items are scored on a 0 (I cannot do this at all) to 4 (I can do this extremely well) scale. Higher total scores (range = 0-52) indicate greater ability and confidence to utilize coping skills.
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) - Sleep SubscaleAssessed Pre-intervention (week 0), Bi-weekly, Post-intervention (week 8). Pre-intervention (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 8) reported.The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a 4-item self-report that measures the extent to which pain interferes with usual activity, sleep, mood, and stress. One of four DVPRS (Sleep Subscale) reported and scored on 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) scale.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep DisturbancePre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)The PROMIS Sleep Disturbance is an 8-item self-report of challenges affecting sleep and overall sleep quality and satisfaction over the past seven days. PROMIS Sleep Disturbance items are scored between 1 and 5: not at all (1) to very much (5), never (1) to always (5), and very poor (1) to very good (5). Total raw scores are converted to T-scores, with higher T-score values (e.g., 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10) indicating worse outcome (greater sleep disturbance or worse sleep quality).
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical FunctionPre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)The PROMIS Physical Function is an 8-item self-report to assess participants' general ability to complete daily living activities. PROMIS Physical Function items are scored on a 1 (unable to do) to 5 (without any difficulty) or 1 (cannot do) to 5 (not at all) point scale. Total scores are converted to T-scores, with higher T-score values (e.g., 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10) indicating greater better outcome (higher physical function).
Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) Questionnaire- Dysfunction IndexPre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) is a 46-item self-report to assess the extent to which one's injury interferes with their ability to complete daily living activities. The SMFA Dysfunction Intex contains 34 items that assess musculoskeletal function. SMFA items are scored on a 1 (no problems/difficulty) to 5 (unable to do) scale. Total scores are calcuted by summing items 1-34 for the Dysfunction Index. Total scores are standardized \[(Actual raw score - lowest possible raw score/possible raw score range) \*100\], with high scores indicating poor function (standardized subscale range, min = 0, max = 100).
Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) Questionnaire - Bother IndexPre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) is a 46-item self-report to assess the extent to which one's injury interferes with their ability to complete daily living activities. The SMFA Bother Index has 12 items that assess symptom burden. SMFA items are scored on a 1 (no problems/difficulty) to 5 (unable to do) scale. Total scores are calculated by summing items 35-46 for the Bothersome Index. Total scores are standardized \[(Actual raw score - lowest possible raw score/possible raw score range) \*100\], with high scores indicating poor function (standardized subscale range, min = 0, max = 100).
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - Pain at RestAssessed Pre-intervention (week 0), Bi-weekly, Post-intervention (week 8). Pre-intervention (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 8) reported.The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a 2-item self-report that assesses participants' pain intensity at rest during the past week. One of two NRS items (pain at rest) is reported and scored on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst ever) scale.
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - Pain With ActivityAssessed Pre-intervention (week 0), Bi-weekly, Post-intervention (week 8). Pre-intervention (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 8) reported.The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a 2-item self-report that assesses participants' pain intensity with activity during the past week. One of two NRS items (pain with activity) reported and scored on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst ever) scale.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a 13-item self-report of catastrophic thoughts and emotions related to pain. The PCS-13 is scored on 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) scale. Higher scores (range = 0-52) indicate greater pain catastrophizing.
Pain Anxiety Scale (PASS)Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS) is a 20-item self-report of fear and anxiety related to pain. The PASS-20 is scored on 0 (never) to 5 (always) scale. Higher scores (range= 0-100) indicate greater pain anxiety.
Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire is a 10-item self-report that measures participants' confidence in completing daily tasks and leisure activities despite experiencing pain. PSEQ items are scored on a 0 (not at all confident) to 6 (completely confident) scale. Higher total sum scores (total range = 0-60) indicate greater better outcome (pain self-efficacy).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

No enrolled participants were excluded from the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Skills-Based VR
Participants will complete daily skills-based Virtual Reality (VR) sessions for 8 weeks (an average of 6 minutes per day) to determine the feasibility of at-home VR technology to aid the recovery of acute orthopedic musculoskeletal injuries. The VR device software is equipped with pain-specific treatment modules (e.g., Pain Education, Relaxation/Interoception, Mindful Escapes, and Pain Distraction Games) derived from evidence-based principles of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), mindfulness, and pain neuroscience education. RelieveVRx: Participants will complete daily skills-based Virtual Reality (VR) sessions for 8 weeks (an average of 6 minutes per day) to determine the feasibility of at-home VR technology to aid the recovery of acute orthopedic musculoskeletal injuries. The VR device software is equipped with pain-specific treatment modules (e.g., Pain Education, Relaxation/Interoception, Mindful Escapes, and Pain Distraction Games) derived from evidence-based principles of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), mindfulness, and pain neuroscience education.
10
Total10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSkills-Based VR
Age, Continuous46.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.86
Education
Completed college (16 years)
3 Participants
Education
Graduate/professional degree (>16 years)
6 Participants
Education
Some college/Associates degree (<16 years)
1 Participants
Employment
Employed full-time
8 Participants
Employment
Employed part-time
1 Participants
Employment
Unemployed
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Income
$15,000 to less than $20,000
1 Participants
Income
$50,000 to less than $75,000
3 Participants
Income
$75,000 or more
6 Participants
Marital Status
Married
3 Participants
Marital Status
Separated or Divorced
1 Participants
Marital Status
Single, never married
5 Participants
Marital Status
Widowed
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Client Satisfaction Questionnaire

Participants' treatment satisfaction, determined by the percentage of participants with scores (range = 3-12) over the scale's midpoint (≥70% good, ≥ 80% excellent).

Time frame: Post-intervention (week 8) only

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Skills-Based VRClient Satisfaction Questionnaire9 Participants
Primary

Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)- Credibility Subscale

Participants' perceived credibility, determined by the percentage of participants with scores (range = 3-27, higher scores mean better outcomes) over the scale's midpoint (≥70% good, ≥ 80% excellent).

Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) only

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Skills-Based VRCredibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)- Credibility Subscale8 Participants
Primary

Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)- Expectancy Subscale

Participants' treatment expectancy, determined by the percentage of participants with scores (range = 3-27, higher scores mean better outcomes) over the scale's midpoint (≥70% good, ≥ 80% excellent).

Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) only

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Skills-Based VRCredibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)- Expectancy Subscale9 Participants
Primary

System Usability Scale

Assess global user experience of the VR device, with higher percentile rankings (range = 0-100) indicating greater usability. Usability was determined by the number of participants with System Usability Scale scores 68 and above (≥70% good, ≥ 80% excellent).

Time frame: Post-intervention (week 8) only

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Skills-Based VRSystem Usability Scale8 Participants
Secondary

Acceptability of Treatment

Acceptability of treatment was determined by the percentage of participants who completed at least 6 of 8 weeks of VR modules (≥70%, good; ≥ 80% excellent).

Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Skills-Based VRAcceptability of Treatment10 Participants
Secondary

Adherence to Pain Surveys

Adherence to Pain Surveys was determined by the percentage of participants who responded to at least 5/7 days for at least 6/8 weeks during the intervention period (≥70% good, ≥80% excellent).

Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Skills-Based VRAdherence to Pain Surveys8 Participants
Secondary

Feasibility of Enrollment

We will report the number of participants who agree to participate out of those eligible, evaluated at the end of study for all participants (≥70% good, ≥ 80% excellent).

Time frame: Throughout the study completion, approximately 1 year

Population: This benchmark indicates the number of participants enrolled out of total eligible. More participants were deemed eligible than the number that enrolled, ultimately making the overall number of participants greater than the number stated in the participant flow.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Skills-Based VRFeasibility of Enrollment10 Participants
Secondary

Feasibility of Outcome Assessments

The feasibility of data collection was determined by the percentage of participants with no missing outcomes data (≥70% good, ≥80% excellent).

Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Skills-Based VRFeasibility of Outcome Assessments10 Participants
Secondary

Motion Sickness and Nausea

Assess adverse experiences with VR, determined by the percentage of participants with responses (range = 0 never to 3 always) below the scale's midpoint (≥70% good, ≥ 80% excellent).

Time frame: Post-intervention (week 8) only

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Skills-Based VRMotion Sickness and Nausea10 Participants
Secondary

Patient's Global Impression of Change

The number of participants that improved much or very much or minimally on the Patient's Global Impression of Change Scores for pain, emotional, and physical function during the VR program.

Time frame: Post-intervention (week 8) only

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Skills-Based VRPatient's Global Impression of Change10 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Center for Epidemiologic Study of Depression (CESD) Scale

The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20-item self-report that assesses how often participants' experience symptoms of depression in the last week. CES-D items are scored on a 0 (rarely or none of the time, less than 1 day) to 3 (most or all of the time, 5-7 days) scale. Higher scores (range = 0-60) indicate greater depressive symptoms.

Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Skills-Based VRCenter for Epidemiologic Study of Depression (CESD) ScalePre-intervention20.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.63
Skills-Based VRCenter for Epidemiologic Study of Depression (CESD) ScalePost-intervention10.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.61
Other Pre-specified

Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS)

The Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale - Revised (CAMS-R) is a 12-item self-report that measures mindfulness principles: attention regulation, present focus, awareness, and non-judgmental awareness. CAMS-R items are scored on a 1 (rarely/not at all) to 4 (almost always) scale. Higher total scores (range = 12-48) indicate greater use of mindfulness.

Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Skills-Based VRCognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS)Pre-intervention31.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.88
Skills-Based VRCognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS)Post-intervention35.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.92
Other Pre-specified

Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) - Activity Subscale

The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a 4-item self-report that measures the extent to which pain interferes with usual activity, sleep, mood, and stress. One of four DVPRS (Activity Subscale) reported and scored on 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) scale.

Time frame: Assessed Pre-intervention (week 0), Bi-weekly, Post-intervention (week 8). Pre-intervention (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 8) reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Skills-Based VRDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) - Activity SubscalePre-intervention6.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
Skills-Based VRDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) - Activity SubscalePost-intervention2.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.05
Other Pre-specified

Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) - Mood Subscale

The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a 4-item self-report that measures the extent to which pain interferes with usual activity, sleep, mood, and stress. One of four DVPRS (Mood Subscale) reported and scored on 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) scale.

Time frame: Assessed Pre-intervention (week 0), Bi-weekly, Post-intervention (week 8). Pre-intervention (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 8) reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Skills-Based VRDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) - Mood SubscalePre-intervention6.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
Skills-Based VRDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) - Mood SubscalePost-intervention2.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Other Pre-specified

Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) - Sleep Subscale

The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a 4-item self-report that measures the extent to which pain interferes with usual activity, sleep, mood, and stress. One of four DVPRS (Sleep Subscale) reported and scored on 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) scale.

Time frame: Assessed Pre-intervention (week 0), Bi-weekly, Post-intervention (week 8). Pre-intervention (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 8) reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Skills-Based VRDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) - Sleep SubscalePre-intervention5.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.41
Skills-Based VRDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) - Sleep SubscalePost-intervention1.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.74
Other Pre-specified

Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) - Stress Subscale

The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a 4-item self-report that measures the extent to which pain interferes with usual activity, sleep, mood, and stress. One of four DVPRS (Stress Subscale) reported and scored is scored on 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) scale.

Time frame: Assessed Pre-intervention (week 0), Bi-weekly, Post-intervention (week 8). Pre-intervention (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 8) reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Skills-Based VRDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) - Stress SubscalePre-intervention6.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.51
Skills-Based VRDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) - Stress SubscalePost-intervention2.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Other Pre-specified

Measure of Current Status (MOCS)

The Measure of Current Status (MOCS) is a 13-item self-report of the ability to use various skills to cope with daily stressors. MOCS items are scored on a 0 (I cannot do this at all) to 4 (I can do this extremely well) scale. Higher total scores (range = 0-52) indicate greater ability and confidence to utilize coping skills.

Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Skills-Based VRMeasure of Current Status (MOCS)Pre-intervention2.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Skills-Based VRMeasure of Current Status (MOCS)Post-intervention2.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Other Pre-specified

Non-narcotic Pain Medications

Number of days that non-narcotic pain medications were taken in the last week.

Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)

Population: Out of 10 total participants, only 6 were included in the analysis for the Outcome Measure as they were taking non-narcotic medications during the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Skills-Based VRNon-narcotic Pain MedicationsPre-intervention1.9 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.23
Skills-Based VRNon-narcotic Pain MedicationsPost-intervention0.6 days per weekStandard Deviation 0.97
Other Pre-specified

Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - Pain at Rest

The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a 2-item self-report that assesses participants' pain intensity at rest during the past week. One of two NRS items (pain at rest) is reported and scored on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst ever) scale.

Time frame: Assessed Pre-intervention (week 0), Bi-weekly, Post-intervention (week 8). Pre-intervention (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 8) reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Skills-Based VRNumerical Rating Scale (NRS) - Pain at RestPre-intervention3.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
Skills-Based VRNumerical Rating Scale (NRS) - Pain at RestPost-intervention1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Other Pre-specified

Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - Pain With Activity

The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a 2-item self-report that assesses participants' pain intensity with activity during the past week. One of two NRS items (pain with activity) reported and scored on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst ever) scale.

Time frame: Assessed Pre-intervention (week 0), Bi-weekly, Post-intervention (week 8). Pre-intervention (week 0) and Post-intervention (week 8) reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Skills-Based VRNumerical Rating Scale (NRS) - Pain With ActivityPre-intervention6.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
Skills-Based VRNumerical Rating Scale (NRS) - Pain With ActivityPost-intervention2.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Other Pre-specified

Pain Anxiety Scale (PASS)

The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS) is a 20-item self-report of fear and anxiety related to pain. The PASS-20 is scored on 0 (never) to 5 (always) scale. Higher scores (range= 0-100) indicate greater pain anxiety.

Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Skills-Based VRPain Anxiety Scale (PASS)Pre-intervention51.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.4
Skills-Based VRPain Anxiety Scale (PASS)Post-intervention18.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.8
Other Pre-specified

Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a 13-item self-report of catastrophic thoughts and emotions related to pain. The PCS-13 is scored on 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) scale. Higher scores (range = 0-52) indicate greater pain catastrophizing.

Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Skills-Based VRPain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Pre-intervention23.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.62
Skills-Based VRPain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Post-intervention7.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.08
Other Pre-specified

Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)

The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire is a 10-item self-report that measures participants' confidence in completing daily tasks and leisure activities despite experiencing pain. PSEQ items are scored on a 0 (not at all confident) to 6 (completely confident) scale. Higher total sum scores (total range = 0-60) indicate greater better outcome (pain self-efficacy).

Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Skills-Based VRPain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)Pre-intervention35.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.67
Skills-Based VRPain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)Post-intervention50.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.95
Other Pre-specified

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function

The PROMIS Physical Function is an 8-item self-report to assess participants' general ability to complete daily living activities. PROMIS Physical Function items are scored on a 1 (unable to do) to 5 (without any difficulty) or 1 (cannot do) to 5 (not at all) point scale. Total scores are converted to T-scores, with higher T-score values (e.g., 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10) indicating greater better outcome (higher physical function).

Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Skills-Based VRPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical FunctionPre-intervention35.32 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.86
Skills-Based VRPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical FunctionPost-intervention43.26 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.13
Other Pre-specified

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance

The PROMIS Sleep Disturbance is an 8-item self-report of challenges affecting sleep and overall sleep quality and satisfaction over the past seven days. PROMIS Sleep Disturbance items are scored between 1 and 5: not at all (1) to very much (5), never (1) to always (5), and very poor (1) to very good (5). Total raw scores are converted to T-scores, with higher T-score values (e.g., 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10) indicating worse outcome (greater sleep disturbance or worse sleep quality).

Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Skills-Based VRPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep DisturbancePre-intervention57.86 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.94
Skills-Based VRPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep DisturbancePost-intervention47.27 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.55
Other Pre-specified

Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) Questionnaire - Bother Index

The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) is a 46-item self-report to assess the extent to which one's injury interferes with their ability to complete daily living activities. The SMFA Bother Index has 12 items that assess symptom burden. SMFA items are scored on a 1 (no problems/difficulty) to 5 (unable to do) scale. Total scores are calculated by summing items 35-46 for the Bothersome Index. Total scores are standardized \[(Actual raw score - lowest possible raw score/possible raw score range) \*100\], with high scores indicating poor function (standardized subscale range, min = 0, max = 100).

Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Skills-Based VRShort Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) Questionnaire - Bother IndexPre-intervention60.76 Standardized subscale scoreStandard Deviation 10.61
Skills-Based VRShort Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) Questionnaire - Bother IndexPost-intervention38.17 Standardized subscale scoreStandard Deviation 11.18
Other Pre-specified

Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) Questionnaire- Dysfunction Index

The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) is a 46-item self-report to assess the extent to which one's injury interferes with their ability to complete daily living activities. The SMFA Dysfunction Intex contains 34 items that assess musculoskeletal function. SMFA items are scored on a 1 (no problems/difficulty) to 5 (unable to do) scale. Total scores are calcuted by summing items 1-34 for the Dysfunction Index. Total scores are standardized \[(Actual raw score - lowest possible raw score/possible raw score range) \*100\], with high scores indicating poor function (standardized subscale range, min = 0, max = 100).

Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 8)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Skills-Based VRShort Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) Questionnaire- Dysfunction IndexPre-intervention51.93 Standardized subscale scoreStandard Deviation 8.45
Skills-Based VRShort Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) Questionnaire- Dysfunction IndexPost-intervention35.46 Standardized subscale scoreStandard Deviation 7.59

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026