Healthy Aging
Conditions
Keywords
cognitive aging, name retrieval
Brief summary
This study is being conducted to learn more about how various personal and situational characteristics are related to the ability to produce names of pictured people. Participants will perform a brief mental exercise, then see 83 celebrity photographs to produce the names of. Participants will also complete other surveys and measures. Collected data will give researchers a better understanding of how different variables relate to proper name production.
Detailed description
This study is being conducted to learn more about how various personal and situational characteristics are related to the ability to produce names of pictured people. Adult participants ages 18-35 and 60-80 will participant in videoconference calls during which they will perform a brief mental exercise, then see 83 celebrity photographs with instructions to name each pictured person. The naming task will be video recorded for later scoring. Participants will also complete other surveys and measures, including some about demographics and other personal characteristics. Participation will take approximately 60-75 minutes. Collected will be de-identified and the aggregate data will give researchers a better understanding about how individual's personality and cognitive traits and the mental exercise performed before the study relate to people's proper name production.
Interventions
Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Participants do not know which condition they are in, nor that there is another condition. They only know what mental exercise they will do in their assigned condition.
Intervention model description
Participants are randomly assigned to one of two mental exercises before performing a proper name production task and completing other measures.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* fluent speaker of English * ages 18-35 or 60-80 * lived in the United States for at least 5 years
Exclusion criteria
\-
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent of Familiar Faces With TOT Responses | During the 60-75 minute experimental session | Percent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the tip of their tongue by saying TOT. |
| Percent of Known Names With TOT Responses | During the 60-75 minute experimental session | Percent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the tip of their tongue by saying TOT. These percentages are out of correct and TOT responses only. |
| Percent of Unknown Names With TOT Responses | During the 60-75 minute experimental session | Percent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the tip of their tongue by saying TOT. These percentages are out of all responses that are not correct or TOTs only. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Mental Exercise: Intervention Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip with mindful breathing
Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise | 54 |
| Mental Exercise: Control Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip of a story
Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise | 55 |
| Total | 109 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Mental Exercise: Intervention | Mental Exercise: Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 26 Participants | 27 Participants | 53 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 28 Participants | 28 Participants | 56 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 52 Participants | 52 Participants | 104 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 41 Participants | 43 Participants | 84 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 41 Participants | 46 Participants | 87 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 13 Participants | 9 Participants | 22 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 54 | 0 / 55 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 54 | 0 / 55 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 54 | 0 / 55 |
Outcome results
Percent of Familiar Faces With TOT Responses
Percent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the tip of their tongue by saying TOT.
Time frame: During the 60-75 minute experimental session
Population: Some participants completed the experiment but their data were not included due to having distractions present during testing (e.g., another individual interrupting the participant), experiencing a terrible internet connection during testing, being uncomfortable with turning on their video during testing, and not meeting the age inclusion criteria after initially claiming that they did.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mental Exercise: Intervention | Percent of Familiar Faces With TOT Responses | Young Adults | 16 Percent of familiar faces with TOTs | Standard Deviation 14 |
| Mental Exercise: Intervention | Percent of Familiar Faces With TOT Responses | Older Adults | 18 Percent of familiar faces with TOTs | Standard Deviation 14 |
| Mental Exercise: Control | Percent of Familiar Faces With TOT Responses | Young Adults | 15 Percent of familiar faces with TOTs | Standard Deviation 9 |
| Mental Exercise: Control | Percent of Familiar Faces With TOT Responses | Older Adults | 15 Percent of familiar faces with TOTs | Standard Deviation 12 |
Percent of Known Names With TOT Responses
Percent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the tip of their tongue by saying TOT. These percentages are out of correct and TOT responses only.
Time frame: During the 60-75 minute experimental session
Population: Some participants completed the experiment but their data were not included due to having distractions present during testing (e.g., another individual interrupting the participant), experiencing a terrible internet connection during testing, being uncomfortable with turning on their video during testing, and not meeting the age inclusion criteria after initially claiming that they did.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mental Exercise: Intervention | Percent of Known Names With TOT Responses | Older Adults | 15 Percent of known names with TOTs | Standard Deviation 12 |
| Mental Exercise: Intervention | Percent of Known Names With TOT Responses | Young Adults | 15 Percent of known names with TOTs | Standard Deviation 9 |
| Mental Exercise: Control | Percent of Known Names With TOT Responses | Young Adults | 16 Percent of known names with TOTs | Standard Deviation 14 |
| Mental Exercise: Control | Percent of Known Names With TOT Responses | Older Adults | 18 Percent of known names with TOTs | Standard Deviation 14 |
Percent of Unknown Names With TOT Responses
Percent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the tip of their tongue by saying TOT. These percentages are out of all responses that are not correct or TOTs only.
Time frame: During the 60-75 minute experimental session
Population: Some participants completed the experiment but their data were not included due to having distractions present during testing (e.g., another individual interrupting the participant), experiencing a terrible internet connection during testing, being uncomfortable with turning on their video during testing, and not meeting the age inclusion criteria after initially claiming that they did.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mental Exercise: Intervention | Percent of Unknown Names With TOT Responses | Young Adults | 41 Percent of unknown names with TOTs | Standard Deviation 22 |
| Mental Exercise: Intervention | Percent of Unknown Names With TOT Responses | Older Adults | 39 Percent of unknown names with TOTs | Standard Deviation 25 |
| Mental Exercise: Control | Percent of Unknown Names With TOT Responses | Young Adults | 37 Percent of unknown names with TOTs | Standard Deviation 25 |
| Mental Exercise: Control | Percent of Unknown Names With TOT Responses | Older Adults | 34 Percent of unknown names with TOTs | Standard Deviation 20 |