Skip to content

What Makes People Better at Retrieving Proper Names?

What Makes People Better at Retrieving Proper Names?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05550779
Enrollment
109
Registered
2022-09-22
Start date
2022-10-01
Completion date
2023-05-26
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Aging

Keywords

cognitive aging, name retrieval

Brief summary

This study is being conducted to learn more about how various personal and situational characteristics are related to the ability to produce names of pictured people. Participants will perform a brief mental exercise, then see 83 celebrity photographs to produce the names of. Participants will also complete other surveys and measures. Collected data will give researchers a better understanding of how different variables relate to proper name production.

Detailed description

This study is being conducted to learn more about how various personal and situational characteristics are related to the ability to produce names of pictured people. Adult participants ages 18-35 and 60-80 will participant in videoconference calls during which they will perform a brief mental exercise, then see 83 celebrity photographs with instructions to name each pictured person. The naming task will be video recorded for later scoring. Participants will also complete other surveys and measures, including some about demographics and other personal characteristics. Participation will take approximately 60-75 minutes. Collected will be de-identified and the aggregate data will give researchers a better understanding about how individual's personality and cognitive traits and the mental exercise performed before the study relate to people's proper name production.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMental Exercise

Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Colorado, Colorado Springs
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants do not know which condition they are in, nor that there is another condition. They only know what mental exercise they will do in their assigned condition.

Intervention model description

Participants are randomly assigned to one of two mental exercises before performing a proper name production task and completing other measures.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* fluent speaker of English * ages 18-35 or 60-80 * lived in the United States for at least 5 years

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Familiar Faces With TOT ResponsesDuring the 60-75 minute experimental sessionPercent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the tip of their tongue by saying TOT.
Percent of Known Names With TOT ResponsesDuring the 60-75 minute experimental sessionPercent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the tip of their tongue by saying TOT. These percentages are out of correct and TOT responses only.
Percent of Unknown Names With TOT ResponsesDuring the 60-75 minute experimental sessionPercent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the tip of their tongue by saying TOT. These percentages are out of all responses that are not correct or TOTs only.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mental Exercise: Intervention
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip with mindful breathing Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
54
Mental Exercise: Control
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip of a story Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
55
Total109

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMental Exercise: InterventionMental Exercise: ControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
26 Participants27 Participants53 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
28 Participants28 Participants56 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
52 Participants52 Participants104 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
41 Participants43 Participants84 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants46 Participants87 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants9 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 540 / 55
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 540 / 55
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 540 / 55

Outcome results

Primary

Percent of Familiar Faces With TOT Responses

Percent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the tip of their tongue by saying TOT.

Time frame: During the 60-75 minute experimental session

Population: Some participants completed the experiment but their data were not included due to having distractions present during testing (e.g., another individual interrupting the participant), experiencing a terrible internet connection during testing, being uncomfortable with turning on their video during testing, and not meeting the age inclusion criteria after initially claiming that they did.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mental Exercise: InterventionPercent of Familiar Faces With TOT ResponsesYoung Adults16 Percent of familiar faces with TOTsStandard Deviation 14
Mental Exercise: InterventionPercent of Familiar Faces With TOT ResponsesOlder Adults18 Percent of familiar faces with TOTsStandard Deviation 14
Mental Exercise: ControlPercent of Familiar Faces With TOT ResponsesYoung Adults15 Percent of familiar faces with TOTsStandard Deviation 9
Mental Exercise: ControlPercent of Familiar Faces With TOT ResponsesOlder Adults15 Percent of familiar faces with TOTsStandard Deviation 12
Primary

Percent of Known Names With TOT Responses

Percent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the tip of their tongue by saying TOT. These percentages are out of correct and TOT responses only.

Time frame: During the 60-75 minute experimental session

Population: Some participants completed the experiment but their data were not included due to having distractions present during testing (e.g., another individual interrupting the participant), experiencing a terrible internet connection during testing, being uncomfortable with turning on their video during testing, and not meeting the age inclusion criteria after initially claiming that they did.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mental Exercise: InterventionPercent of Known Names With TOT ResponsesOlder Adults15 Percent of known names with TOTsStandard Deviation 12
Mental Exercise: InterventionPercent of Known Names With TOT ResponsesYoung Adults15 Percent of known names with TOTsStandard Deviation 9
Mental Exercise: ControlPercent of Known Names With TOT ResponsesYoung Adults16 Percent of known names with TOTsStandard Deviation 14
Mental Exercise: ControlPercent of Known Names With TOT ResponsesOlder Adults18 Percent of known names with TOTsStandard Deviation 14
Primary

Percent of Unknown Names With TOT Responses

Percent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the tip of their tongue by saying TOT. These percentages are out of all responses that are not correct or TOTs only.

Time frame: During the 60-75 minute experimental session

Population: Some participants completed the experiment but their data were not included due to having distractions present during testing (e.g., another individual interrupting the participant), experiencing a terrible internet connection during testing, being uncomfortable with turning on their video during testing, and not meeting the age inclusion criteria after initially claiming that they did.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mental Exercise: InterventionPercent of Unknown Names With TOT ResponsesYoung Adults41 Percent of unknown names with TOTsStandard Deviation 22
Mental Exercise: InterventionPercent of Unknown Names With TOT ResponsesOlder Adults39 Percent of unknown names with TOTsStandard Deviation 25
Mental Exercise: ControlPercent of Unknown Names With TOT ResponsesYoung Adults37 Percent of unknown names with TOTsStandard Deviation 25
Mental Exercise: ControlPercent of Unknown Names With TOT ResponsesOlder Adults34 Percent of unknown names with TOTsStandard Deviation 20

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026