Skip to content

Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hypoglycemia in Adults With Pancreatogenic Diabetes

Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hypoglycemia in Adults With Pancreatogenic Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05550480
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-09-22
Start date
2022-09-08
Completion date
2024-06-05
Last updated
2024-10-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatogenic Type 3C Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Chronic pancreatitis, Pancreatic Diseases, Digestive System Diseases, Diabetes, Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Brief summary

This study will investigate the effect of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) (compared to self-monitoring) on hypoglycemia and glycemic control in patients with insulin-treated pancreatogenic diabetes.

Detailed description

The use of CGM in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes receiving multiple daily insulin injections improves glycemic control and reduces time spent in hypoglycemia compared to self-monitoring. These beneficial effects of CGM are likely also present in people with pancreatogenic diabetes but have only been sparsely investigated. In this study, the investigators, therefore, aim to investigate the effects of CGM (compared to self-monitoring) on hypoglycemia and glycemic control in patients with pancreatogenic diabetes. Patients with chronic pancreatitis and insulin-treated diabetes will be randomized 1:1 to receive 50 days of CGM followed by 50 days of self-monitoring or vice versa. Each study period is preceded by 20 days of masked CGM assessment, which also serves as the washout period between the two study periods. Furthermore, the self-monitoring group will use masked CGM for the last 20 days of the study period to monitor glucose levels for comparison with the unmasked CGM period. Thus, each study period lasts a total of 70 days. The investigators hypothesize that the use of CGM vs self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with pancreatogenic diabetes will lead to decreased time spent with a glucose value \<3.0 mmol/l and increased time in glycemic range.

Interventions

DEVICEContinuous glucose monitoring

Continuous glucose monitoring for 50 days

Sponsors

Aalborg University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed informed consent before any study specific procedures * Able to read and understand Danish * Male or female age ≥ 18 ≤ 85 years * A definitive diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis based on the M-ANNHEIM criteria * A diagnosis of insulin treated pancreatogenic diabetes based on the World Health Organization criteria for diabetes (HbA1c ≥6.5 % (48 mmol/mol) and/or fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l)) \>3 months after diagnosis of pancreatitis

Exclusion criteria

* Known or suspected abdominal cancer (incl. intestine, pancreas, and the hepato-biliary system) * Severe pre-existing comorbidities (assessed by investigator upon inclusion) * Attack of acute on chronic pancreatitis requiring admission within four weeks prior to inclusion * Use of glucocorticoid medications within four weeks prior to inclusion, with the exception of inhaled glucocorticoids in the treatment of chronic pulmonary diseases. * Presence of autoimmune antibodies suggestive of type 1 diabetes * Prior pancreatic surgery (including total pancreatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, pancreaticojejunostomy, enucleation, or Frey procedure) * Prior gastric surgery or vagotomy * Autoimmune pancreatitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time spent with glucose value <3.0 mmol/l (level 2 hypoglycemia)In period 1, the observation period begins on day 50 ±2 days of the study and ends on day 70 ±2 days. In period 2, the observation period starts on day 120 ±2 days and ends on day 140 ±2 days.The difference between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in time spent with glucose value \<3.0 mmol/l (level 2 hypoglycemia) measured by CGM.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time below range (glucose <3.9 mmol/L)In period 1, the observation period begins on day 50 ±2 days of the study and ends on day 70 ±2 days. In period 2, the observation period starts on day 120 ±2 days and ends on day 140 ±2 days.The difference between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in time below range (glucose value \< 3.9 mmol/L) measured by CGM.
Time below range (glucose 3.0-3.8 mmol/L, hypoglycaemia level 1)In period 1, the observation period begins on day 50 ±2 days of the study and ends on day 70 ±2 days. In period 2, the observation period starts on day 120 ±2 days and ends on day 140 ±2 days.The difference between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in time below range (glucose value 3.0-3.8 mmol/L) measured by CGM.
Time above range (glucose >10.0 mmol/L)In period 1, the observation period begins on day 50 ±2 days of the study and ends on day 70 ±2 days. In period 2, the observation period starts on day 120 ±2 days and ends on day 140 ±2 days.The difference between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in time above range (glucose value \>10.0 mmol/L) measured by CGM.
Time above range (glucose 10.1-13.9 mmol/L, hyperglycaemia level 1)In period 1, the observation period begins on day 50 ±2 days of the study and ends on day 70 ±2 days. In period 2, the observation period starts on day 120 ±2 days and ends on day 140 ±2 days.The difference between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in time above range (glucose value 10.1-13.9 mmol/L) measured by CGM.
Time above range (glucose >13.9 mmol/L, hyperglycaemia level 2)In period 1, the observation period begins on day 50 ±2 days of the study and ends on day 70 ±2 days. In period 2, the observation period starts on day 120 ±2 days and ends on day 140 ±2 days.The difference between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in time above range (glucose value \>13.9 mmol/L) measured by CGM.
Mean glucose (mmol/L)The last 20 ±2 days of each study periodThe difference between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in mean glucose (mmol/L) measured by CGM.
Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions [MAGE]In period 1, the observation period begins on day 50 ±2 days of the study and ends on day 70 ±2 days. In period 2, the observation period starts on day 120 ±2 days and ends on day 140 ±2 days.The difference between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in mean amplitude of glycemic excursions \[MAGE\] measured by CGM.
Continuous overall net glycemic action [CONGA]In period 1, the observation period begins on day 50 ±2 days of the study and ends on day 70 ±2 days. In period 2, the observation period starts on day 120 ±2 days and ends on day 140 ±2 days.The difference between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in continuous overall net glycemic action \[CONGA\] measured by CGM.
Time in range (glucose value 3.9 - 10.0 mmol/l)In period 1, the observation period begins on day 50 ±2 days of the study and ends on day 70 ±2 days. In period 2, the observation period starts on day 120 ±2 days and ends on day 140 ±2 days.The difference between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in time in range (glucose value 3.9 - 10.0 mmol/L) measured by CGM.
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30)At the end of each study period (day 70 ±2 and 140 ±2).Difference between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in quality of life assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The questionnaire has been validated for assessment of quality of life in patients with chronic pancreatitis and is composed of single-item measures and multi-item scales with scores ranging from 0 to 100 after linear transformation of the raw score. A high score for a functional scale represents a high level of functioning, as does a high score for the global health status, while a high score for the symptom items represents a high level of symptomatology.
Patient global impression of change score (PGIC)At the end of each study period (day 70 ±2 and 140 ±2).Difference between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in Patient global impression of change score (PGIC). The PGIC is a self-reported measure used to assess a patient's overall perception of improvement or change in their condition over time. It uses a 7-point scale, ranging from very much improved to very much worse. A score ≤3 means that the condition has improved.
Hypoglycemia awarenessAt the end of each study period (day 70 ±2 and 140 ±2).The difference between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in hypoglycemia awareness assessed by the Clarke Hypoglycemia Awareness Survey. It comprises eight questions characterizing the participant's exposure to episodes of moderate and severe hypoglycemia. It also examines the glycemic threshold for, and symptomatic responses to, hypoglycemia. A score of four or more implies impaired awareness of hypoglycemia.
Standard deviation (mmol/L)In period 1, the observation period begins on day 50 ±2 days of the study and ends on day 70 ±2 days. In period 2, the observation period starts on day 120 ±2 days and ends on day 140 ±2 days.The difference between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in standard deviation of mean glucose (mmol/L) measured by CGM.
Coefficient of variance (%)In period 1, the observation period begins on day 50 ±2 days of the study and ends on day 70 ±2 days. In period 2, the observation period starts on day 120 ±2 days and ends on day 140 ±2 days.The difference between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in coefficient of variance of mean glucose (mmol/L) measured by CGM.
HbA1c (mmol/L)At the end of each study period (day 70 ±2 and 140 ±2).The difference between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in HbA1c mmol/L.
HbA1c (percentage)At the end of each study period (day 70 ±2 and 140 ±2).The difference between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in HbA1c (percentage).
Insulin dose (unit)The last 20 ±2 days of each study periodThe difference in the mean insulin dose between CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026