Skip to content

Should Preoperative Information Before Impacted Third Molar Extraction?

Should Preoperative Information Before Impacted Third Molar Extraction Be Visual, Verbal or Both?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05548790
Enrollment
86
Registered
2022-09-21
Start date
2022-05-01
Completion date
2022-06-30
Last updated
2022-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impacted Third Molar Tooth, Dental Anxiety

Keywords

third molar extraction, Dental anxiety, preoperative information

Brief summary

The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of different preoperative information techniques (verbal, written, video with background audio, and silent video with subtitles) on patients' anxiety levels before and after third molar extraction. The secondary objective was to determine the superiority of the information methods evaluated over each other. We hypothesized that the information provided by video with or without background audio would decrease preoperative and postoperative anxiety levels more effectively than information provided by verbal and written methods.

Detailed description

This prospective study included 86 patients who underwent third molar extraction under local anesthesia in the Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Turkey, between May and June 2022. The research protocol was approved by The Yıldırım Beyazıt University Oral and Health Training and Research Hospital Ethical Committee,Turkey. (No: E-2022-14) Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S), Dental Fear Scale (DFS), Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) are commonly used questionnaires for dental anxiety. The latter asked only about age and sex. They were used together before and immediately after surgery to obtain better results in this study. After examining the panoramic radiographs, patients who underwent extraction were included in Classes 1 and II, Positions A and B according to Pell-Gregory classification, and mesioangular and vertical positions according to the Winter classification. Each patient was examined by the researcher. The patients were informed about the procedure, and written informed consent was obtained from the patient's preoperative assessment clinic. If a patient had additional questions, they were included as part of the investigation Patients were assigned to 4 groups: Group 1 was informed via silent video with subtitle, group 2 was informed via video with background audio, group 3 was informed with written information brochure, group 4 (control group) was informed preoperatively verbally. The Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S), Dental Fear Scale (DFS), Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS), and visual analog scale (VAS) were used pre- and postoperatively to evaluate the dental anxiety of patients

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSpielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S)

STAI is one of the most frequently used scales in anxiety research, although it is not a specific scale for dental anxiety

DFS is a scale developed by Kleinknecht used to determine dental fear in different dimensions. This is a Likert-type scale with a score of 1-5. It has 20 items. It examines the level of fear in terms of dentist avoidance, somatic symptoms of fear, and fear of various applications in dentistry practice

MDAS was developed by Humphris et al. by adding a question related to injection. The scale consists of five-point Likert-type rating with five options. The scoring in this scale varies between 5 and 25

VAS is ideal for evaluating situations that cannot be measured using digital and oral information. In the present study, a scale comprising 100-mm closed-end line was used to measure the anxiety level. One end of the scale was labeled as no anxiety and the other end as maximum anxiety imaginable

Sponsors

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Intervention model description

Group 1 was informed via silent video with subtitle, group 2 was informed via video with background audio, group 3 was informed with written information brochure, group 4 (control group) was informed verbally.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who did not have pain * Signs of infection related to the third molar were included * American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score I and II * The absence of any systemic disease and regular medication use

Exclusion criteria

* Patients have the presence of an existing psychiatric disorder, psychiatric disorders, anxiolytic or antidepressant drug treatment * Patients who were pregnant or lactated * Patients who couldn't understand or fill out questionnaires, had presence of visual or auditory deficits, refuse to watch the video or join the study, had incomplete data * Patients who had a previous negative experience with dental treatment were excluded from the study, as it may cause higher anxiety levels * Those who watched a video on the subject before were not included in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of anxiety with Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory(STAI-S) between groups preoperatively and postoperatively2 minutesSTAI-S is a 20-item scale that determines the current anxiety level of the patient with reliability and validity in Turkish. Widely used to assess anxiety, the STAI explores the transient state of anxiety, and patients report how they are feeling at the current time point. It is scored using a 4-level frequency scale ranging from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 20 to 80, higher scores indicates higher anxiety
Evaluation of anxiety with Dental Fear Survey(DFS) between groups preoperatively and postoperatively2 minutesDFS is which consists of 20-items is used to determine physiological responses to dental stimuli via a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5. Total scores change from 20 to 100 point. It collects the evaluation of dental anxiety under 3 headings. The first 2 questions assess avoidance of dentistry, questions 3-7 show physiological arousal, and questions 8-20 predict fear of certain situations
Evaluation of anxiety with Modified Dental Anxiety Scale(MDAS) between groups preoperatively and postoperatively1 minuteMDAS which is created by adding one question to the Corah Dental Anxiety Scale have 5-item questionnaire with 5-point Likert-type scale. Scale shows points between 5 and 25
Evaluation of anxiety with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between groups preoperatively and postoperatively1 minuteVAS is a digital and verbal assessment scale used to measure anxiety. A closed-ended scale of 0-100 mm (0 no anxiety, 100 maximum imaginable anxiety) was used in the study, and participants were asked to put a mark on the VAS scale, which they thought showed the degree of their current anxiety

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026