Pressure Sore
Conditions
Brief summary
The study focuses on the impact of a digital MEDIASCREEN tool on the knowledge, technical know-how and behavioural skills in terms of pressure sores of patients. In addition, the cognitive impact of this type of tool will also be studied in our study population (self-esteem and feeling of personal effectiveness). The objective is to compare the impact of a digital MEDIASCREEN information tool with information tool compared to the usual paper-based prevention materials on knowledge of the risk of hospital-acquired pressure sores.
Interventions
OTHERNumeric prevention
Numeric information for prevention of pressure sores thgrough digital tool MEDIASCREEN
OTHERPaper prevention
Information for prevention of pressure sores in classic way with paper
Sponsors
Pôle Saint Hélier
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patient in complete hospitalization in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation * Patient affiliated to a social security system * Patient presenting a low to high risk of pressure ulcer inferior or equal to or equal to 16 on the Norton scale * Patient having signed his consent
Exclusion criteria
* Difficulty understanding and is unable to give free and informed consent * Pregnant women * Person deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative administrative decision * Major under legal protection by a judicial or administrative decision. * Person in an emergency situation unable to give their informed consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate the change on the knowledge of the risk of hospital-acquired pressure sores with a digital MEDIASCREEN information tool in comparison to the usual paper-based prevention materials | Change from baseline knowledge at 1 month | The comparison will be done with Skin-Management Needs Assessment Checklist score (SMNac). Minimum value =0, Maximum value = 100; higher score better outcome. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Assess the cognitive impact of the prevention information delivered by MEDIASCREEN tool, on self-esteem. | At the beginning and at 1 month | Measured of self-esteem with Rosenberg scale. Score range : 10-40. High scores indicate high self esteem. |
| Assess the cognitive impact of the prevention information delivered by MEDIASCREEN tool, on sense of self-efficacy. | At the beginning and at 1 month | Measured of self-efficacy with scale to evaluate the feeling of personal effectiveness (MSES) Score range: 16-80. High scores indicate high feeling of personal effectiveness. |
| Evaluate the psychological impact of information delivered from the tools | At 1 month | Measured by Visual Analogic scale from 0 to 100. Zero is represented : No knowledge and 100 : Perfectly mastered subject. Higher scores better outcome. |
| Evaluate the occurrence of pressure sores during hospitalization | At the beginning and at 1 month | Count of the apparition number of pressure sores. |
| Evaluate patient satisfaction with the information delivered by the MEDIASCREEN digital tool | At 1 month | Measured by Visual Analogic scale from 0 to 100. Zero is represented : Not at all satisfied and 100 : Completely satisfied. Higher scores better outcome. |
| Evaluate the user experience when using the digital tool MEDIASCREEN. | At 1 month | Measured by Questionnaire Attrakdiff for the user experience. The AttrakDiff questionnaire contains 28 question with 7 Likert-type scale from -3 to 3. |
| Evaluate the observance when using the digital tool MEDIASCREEN. | At 1 month | Measured by the connexion data : number of connexion, duration of connexion, percentage of completion. |
| Evaluate the acceptability of the digital information tool MEDIASCREEN digital information tool or the paper information brochure. | At the beggining and at 1 month | The acceptability will be assessed using a 13-item questionnaire based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. Each question is based on a Likert-type 5 point scale ranging from : 1=In total disagreement, 2= Somewhat disagree, 3= Neither agree nor disagree, 4= Somewhat agree, 5=In total agreement. |
| Evaluate the acquisition of knowledge by patients | At 1 month | Evaluate with questionnaire of knowledge, compose by 5 questions on three points each. The overall questionnaire will be on 15 points. Higher scores better outcome. |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed