Skip to content

Comparing Electrical Impedance Tomography to Computed Tomographic Angiography

Assessing the Effectiveness of Electrical Impedance Tomography Images to Detect Pulmonary Emboli Compared to Computed Tomographic Angiography

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05546333
Enrollment
63
Registered
2022-09-19
Start date
2023-05-01
Completion date
2026-06-09
Last updated
2025-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Embolism

Brief summary

The study aim is to determine whether electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is equivalent in the detection of pulmomary emboli compared to Computed Tomographic Angiography (CTA). EIT is a non-invasive, non-ionizing functional imaging technique that can be performed at bedside. Electrical impedance tomography data will be collected on individuals undergoing a CTA scan of the chest at Medical Center of the Rockies (MCR). The primary outcome measure is to assess whether assessment by CTA corresponds with EIT in detection of pulmonary emboli. The study will include up to 63 participants. EIT data will be collected for up to 20 minutes during tidal breathing and for approximately five to ten seconds during breath-holding.

Interventions

DEVICEElectrical impedance tomography

Non-invasive measure of electrical impedance in the body, with data collected on electrodes on the surface of the body

Sponsors

UC Health Medical Center of the Rockies
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Colorado State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older * Undergoing a CTA of the chest at MCR

Exclusion criteria

* Under 18 years of age * Body mass index (BMI) \> 30 * Individuals with known thoracic metal implants or devices, such as pacemakers (internal and external), staples, or spinal and rib hardware * Individuals deemed by the research team as too unstable to safely apply the EIT belt, such as hemodynamic or respiratory instability (e.g., intubated patients), and individuals with unstable spinal injuries * Open wounds at the site of electrode belt application

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correspondence to CTAOne yearTo assess whether assessment by CTA corresponds with EIT in detection of pulmonary emboli (PE).

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026