Neck Pain
Conditions
Brief summary
Neck pain ranks as the 4th leading cause of disability, with high prevalence of mechanical neck pain in young population. As high as 30% of %. Individuals suffering from neck often report difficulty in performance of daily life, absence from work and decreased productivity. Several manual therapy treatment approaches are used for mechanical neck pain. The focus of this study is to compare the effectiveness of thrust and non-thrust thoracic manipulation for the treatment of mechanical neck pain in young population
Detailed description
craniovertebral angle, cervical range of motion and pain will be noted for each participant.
Interventions
PROCEDUREThrust Manipulation
Prone thoracic extension manipulation technique will be applied from T2 - T6 to participants of Group A (Experimental group). Intervention will be applied on alternate days with a total of 4 treatment sessions
PROCEDURENon-Thrust manipulation
Maitland grade III or IV thoracic 0manipulation will be given to participants of Control group from T1 to T6. Posterior to anterior glide over spinous process will be maintained for 30 seconds. Intervention will be applied on alternate days with a total of 4 treatment sessions
PROCEDUREStandard Treatment
Standard treatment protocol includes moist heat, TENS and Post isometric relaxation technique. Standard treatment will be given to both groups on every session. Standard treatment consists of: Superficial Moist Heat (Device): Superficial moist heat will me applied for 10 minutes on Upper Trapezius TENS (Device): TENS will be applied for 10 minutes at 80-100Hz, the electrodes will be placed at upper trapezius. Post-isometric Relaxation (procedure/surgery): 5-10 repetions of Post Isometric relaxation technique will be applied on various muscle groups which include Upper trapezius, levator scapulae, sternocleidomastoid and scalenes.
Sponsors
Foundation University Islamabad
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Randomized Controlled Trial Study
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Both genders * Age: 18-24 years * Symptoms \<30 days * FABQPA score \<12 * Increased upper thoracic spine kyphosis (visual estimate) * CVA \< 48 Degrees
Exclusion criteria
* Symptoms distal to shoulder * Aggravation of symptoms with looking up * Radiating lower back pain * Neurological deficit * Previous surgery * Spondylolisthesis * Spinal stenosis * Inflammatory disease * Vertebrobasilar artery insufficiency * Pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Craniovertebral Angle | 8 days | Craniovertebral Angle wll be measured using Goniometer. CVA \>48 is considered normal, CVA \<48 is considered as Forward head posture. Immovable arm of the goniometer will be placed at the C7 spinous process and the movable arm at the tragus of the ear making an angle between the two lines, normal of which is 49.9 and angle less than that is considered as abnormal. Data will be collected directly from participants using Gomiometer before initiation of treatment and after 4th session. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical Range of Motion | 8 days | Cervical Range of motion will be measured using bubble inclinometer. Measurement will be taken before the initiation of treatment and after 4Th treatment session. Increase in Cervical ROM will be considered a positive outcome. |
| Pain intensity | 8 days | Pain will be assessed using Numeric pain rating scale which comprises of 11 points where point (0) signifies no pain and point (10) signifies worst imaginable pain. Measurement will be taken before the initiation of treatment and after 4Th treatment session. Low score for the NPRS will be considered a positive outcome. |
Countries
Pakistan
Outcome results
None listed