Skip to content

Comparison of Left Bundle Branch Area Versus Right Ventricular Septal Pacing in Patients With High-degree Conduction Disease After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (Left Bundle BRAVE)

Comparison of Left Bundle Branch Area Versus Right Ventricular Septal Pacing in Patients With High-degree Conduction Disease After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05541679
Enrollment
46
Registered
2022-09-15
Start date
2022-12-28
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2024-12-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Stenosis, Complete Heart Block, High Degree Second Degree Atrioventricular Block, Pacemaker-Induced Cardiomyopathy

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to investigate the superiority of chronic left bundle branch area pacing compared to traditional right ventricular (RV) septal pacing in patients with high-grade conduction disease after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In this investigator initiated, multicenter, prospective, double-blinded, crossover study, chronic left bundle branch area pacing will be compared to chronic right ventricular septal pacing using echocardiographic measures of left ventricular systolic function in patients with a high cumulative ventricular pacing burden after TAVR.

Interventions

DEVICERight ventricular septal pacing followed by left bundle branch area pacing

All patients will undergo implantation of right ventricular septal lead, left bundle branch area lead, and atrial lead in the absence of permanent atrial fibrillation with a CRT-pacing generator. Patients will be randomized to pacing protocols based on group assignment and crossover during the study.

DEVICELeft bundle branch area pacing followed by right ventricular septal pacing

All patients will undergo implantation of right ventricular septal lead, left bundle branch area lead, and atrial lead in the absence of permanent atrial fibrillation with a CRT-pacing generator. Patients will be randomized to pacing protocols based on group assignment and crossover during the study.

Sponsors

Sharpe-Strumia Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Main Line Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject has at least one of these conduction disturbances: 1. Symptomatic (or hemodynamically significant) bradycardia or symptomatic persistent atrioventricular block including first-degree and Mobitz I (Wenckebach) or Mobitz type II atrioventricular bock 2. High-grade atrioventricular block 3. Third-degree atrioventricular block * Subject has undergone TAVR (any valve system) in the last four weeks * Subject is receiving a first-time pacemaker implant * Subject's most recent documented ejection fraction (by any method) within the past 90 days prior to study enrollment is \> 50% (≥45% if visually estimated at the time of enrollment) * Subject is a male or female at least 18 years old at the time of consent * Subject is able to receive a left sided pectoral implant

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has ever had a previous or has an existing implantable pulse generator (IPG), implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) or biventricular (BiV) implant * Subject has more than mild para-valvular regurgitation following TAVR implantation. * Subject has LVEF \< 45% if visually estimated at the time of enrollment * Subject is indicated for a biventricular pacing device (CRT-P or CRT-D). * Subject is enrolled in a concurrent study that may confound the results of this study * Subject has a mechanical heart valve * Subject is pregnant, or of childbearing potential and not on a reliable form of birth control * Subject status post heart transplant * Subject life expectancy less than 2 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in global longitudinal strain (GLS%)9 monthsPrimary efficacy outcome
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF%)9 monthsPrimary efficacy outcome
Composite of left bundle branch area pacing lead septal myocardial or coronary artery perforation, lead dislodgment, and repeat procedures related to left bundle branch area lead implantation18 monthsPrimary safety endpoint

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of life measured using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MLHQ)9 months
Functional capacity measured using the New York Heart Association functional classification (NYHA)9 months
Six minute walk test score9 months
Hospitalizations for heart failure18 months
Mortality18 months
Right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS%)9 months
Left ventricular mechanical systolic dyssynchrony indexed to heart rate (SDI)9 months
Left ventricular stroke volume9 months
Left ventricular end-systolic volume9 months
Severity of mitral regurgitation18 months
Left bundle branch area pacing lead pacing threshold18 months
Left bundle branch area pacing lead sensed R wave amplitude18 months
Left bundle branch area pacing lead impedence18 months
Brain natriuretic peptide or N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide concentration9 months
Interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD)9 months
Severity of tricuspid regurgitation18 months
Adverse events related to device function18 months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026