Skip to content

Improve Mental Health and Emotional Labor Among Nurses Who Care the End-of-life Patients

Does Cognitive Behavioural Therapy or Mindfulness-based Therapy Improve Mental Health and Emotional Labor Among Nurses Who Care the End-of-life Patients? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05541523
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-09-15
Start date
2022-05-01
Completion date
2023-01-01
Last updated
2022-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

End-of-life, Depression, Anxiety

Brief summary

CBT: cognitive behavioural therapy MBT: mindfulness-based therapy

Detailed description

Nurses caring for terminally ill patients suffer from negative emotions and emotional labor, which may lead to a decline in the quality of end-of-life care. CBT and MBT are currently two commonly used psychological methods. They can be effective in improving bad mood. However, to the best of our knowledge, no investigators have used CBT and MBT among nurses caring for terminally ill patients. Could CBT and MBT be effective in alleviating the psychological distress of these nurses? Which psychological method is more effective?

Interventions

BEHAVIORALcognitive behavioural therapy

The three therapists in the cognitive behavioural group therapy condition were two students of master's degree of nursing with formal education in cognitive therapy and one psychological specialist nurse working in a palliative care unit. There was no evidence of significant deviation from the protocol.

The two therapists in the mindfulness-based stress reduction condition were one clinical psychologist and one student of master's degree of nursing with formal education in mindfulness.Both interventions were manualized. To assure adherence to the study protocol meetings between the therapists and the researchers were organized regularly and the therapists detailed the content of each group session in clinical records which were frequently monitored by a research assistant.

Sponsors

Huichao Zhang
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* (1) Eligible participants were the nurses who nursing patients with stage IV cancer or other incurable diseases; * (2) agree to participate in this research; * (3) no history of mental illness.

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anxietyup to 8 weeksThe Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), developed by Hamilton in 1959,26 was used in this study to assess the anxiety level of the patients. The HAM-A contains 14 items, each scored on a 5-point scale (0, asymptomatic; 1, mild symptoms; 2, moderate symptoms; 3, severe symptoms; 4, extremely severe symptoms). The total sum score, ranging from 0 to 56, can be classified into four levels: 0, no anxiety symptoms; 1-17, mild anxiety; 18-24, moderate anxiety; 25-56, severe anxiety.
Emotional laborup to 8 weeksChinese version scale of emotional labor(C-ELS). Permission to use the Chinese version of the instruments was obtained. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time these questionnaires are used in palliative care programs in China, using a five-point Likert type scale (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree). The scale divided emotional labor into four part surface acting, deep acting, expression of naturally felt emotions and emotion termination. The Cronbach's α of surface acting, deep acting, expression of naturally felt emotions and emotion termination were 0.714, 0.743, 0.846, 0.758, respectively.
Self-Efficacyup to 8 weeksOccupational Coping Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses ( OCSE-N, Occupational Coping Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses ), a total of 9 items, using Likert 5-level scoring method, 1 means ' can not easily deal with ' to 5 means ' can easily deal with ', the total score range of 9 to 45 points, the higher the score, the higher the occupational coping self-efficacy of nurses.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026