Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Human Schwann Cell (ahSC) Augmentation in Severe Peripheral Nerve Injury (PNI)

Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Human Schwann Cell (ahSC) Augmentation in Severe Peripheral Nerve Injury (PNI)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05541250
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-09-15
Start date
2023-05-04
Completion date
2026-09-29
Last updated
2026-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Nerve Injury

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this research study is to evaluate the safety and possible harms of injecting one's own Schwann cells along with nerve auto-graft after a severe injury to a major nerve has occurred.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAutologous Human Schwann Cell

A one-time dose of 1000 μl\* or 80 to 100 million ahSC prepared from segments of the sural nerve from the leg recovered from the participant.

Sponsors

W. Dalton Dietrich
Lead SponsorOTHER
United States Department of Defense
CollaboratorFED

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Persons with severe sciatic nerve injury, brachial plexus injury, and/or major nerve injury at the upper or lower extremity within previous year; 2. Between the ages of 18 and 65 at last birthday

Exclusion criteria

1. Persons unable to safely undergo an MRI; 2. Persons with pre-existing conditions that would preclude satisfactory sural nerve harvest; 3. Persons with severe peripheral nerve injury gap length \> 10 cm; 4. Persons with history of radiation or local cancer in area of nerve injury, including primary tumors of the nerve; 5. Pregnant women or a positive pregnancy test in those women with reproductive potential prior to enrollment; 6. Presence of disease that might interfere with participant safety, compliance, or evaluation of the condition under study; 7. History of active substance abuse; 8. Persons allergic to gentamicin; 9. Persons who test positive for HIV or Hepatitis B or C virus. 10. Persons unable to provide consent independently due to cognitive impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Treatment-related Adverse Events (AEs)Up to 2 yearsSafety will be reported as the incidence of treatment-related AEs as assessed by treating physician

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motor Recovery as assessed using the MRC Grading ScaleUp to 2 yearsMotor recovery will be assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) Grading Scales. MRC Grading Scale scores ranges from 0-5 with a higher score indicating better function
Sensory recovery as assessed by Pin-Prick EvaluationUp to 2 yearsPin prick evaluation will be assessed using the Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Evaluation. Semmes Weinstein Monofilament evaluation has a total score ranging from 0-5 with a higher score indicating better function
Sensory recovery as assessed by the 2-Point Discrimination EvaluationUp to 2 years2-Point Discrimination Evaluation scoring ranges from 2-20mm with a higher score indicating worse function

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTGeorge Jimsheleishvilli, MD
gxj150@med.miami.edu(305) 2434781
STUDY_CHAIRW. Dalton Dietrich, MD

University of Miami

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 15, 2026