Skip to content

Efficacy of the Quell Wearable Device for Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions

Efficacy of the Quell Wearable Device for Treatment of Central Sensitization-related Pain Among Persons With Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05540002
Enrollment
115
Registered
2022-09-14
Start date
2022-10-14
Completion date
2024-09-19
Last updated
2025-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adults 21 and Older, Chronic Pain, Hypersensitivity, Multiple Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions

Keywords

Multiple Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions, Adults 21 and older

Brief summary

This study will examine the pain-relieving effects of a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator device called a Quell for persons with multiple chronic overlapping pain conditions.

Detailed description

This study will examine the pain-relieving effects of a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator device called a Quell for persons with multiple chronic overlapping pain conditions. Participants will attend two quantitative sensory testing visits in order to determine their level of pain sensitivity, one at the beginning of the study and the second at the 3-month Follow-up session. Participants will be asked to test out the Quell device to check for sensation tolerance, and will then be randomized into one of the two treatment groups: the High Intensity Quell group or the Low Intensity Quell group. Participants will be asked to wear the device for at least 3 hours every day and to complete daily assessments, along with a total of three sets of questionnaires: one at the start of the study, the second 6 weeks from the date of consent, and the third 3 months after the date of consent. A member of the research staff will call participants once a week for a brief phone interview throughout the study. Participants will be in this study for 3 months.

Interventions

DEVICEHigh Intensity Quell

Participants will receive 1 hour of continuous stimulation during each therapy session. Subjects are asked to complete a minimum of 3 sessions per day.

DEVICELow Intensity Quell

Participants will receive only three 2-minute periods of stimulation (at 0, 28, 58 minutes) during each 60-minute therapeutic session. Subjects are asked to complete a minimum of 3 sessions per day.

Sponsors

NeuroMetrix, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Neither the principal investigator, the co-investigators, the research assistant, or the subjects will know if they are given the high intensity Quell device or the low intensity Quell device.

Intervention model description

Participants will be equally randomized to one of the two treatment groups: the High Intensity Quell group or the Low Intensity Quell group. All groups will receive the same questionnaires and undergo quantitative sensory testing.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ages 21 and older * Pain duration \> 3 months * Diagnosed by physician with multiple chronic pain conditions * Have chronic pain related to multiple chronic pain diagnoses (headaches, joint pain, back pain, or any of the other COPCs) * Average 4 or greater on pain intensity scale of 0 to 10 * Pain is not accounted for by any other progressive disease (e.g., cancer, MS) * Meets sensory hypersensitivity cutoffs based on QST-assessed evidence * Own a smartphone (iPhone or Android device) and can download the pain app (MasterMyPain) and the Quell Relief mobile app onto their device * Able to speak and understand English

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of cancer or any other malignant disease * Acute osteomyelitis or acute bone disease * Present of past DSM-V diagnosis of schizophrenia, delusional disorder, psychotic disorder, or dissociative disorder that would be judged to interfere with study participation * Pregnancy * Any clinically unstable systemic illness judged to interfere with treatment * A pain condition requiring urgent surgery * An active substance use disorder, such as cocaine or IV heroin use that would interfere with study participation * Have an implanted cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, or other implanted device. * Reynaud's syndrome * Open cuts/sores

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Brief Pain Inventory Interference Scale (BPI)Between group differences at 3-monthsThis is a validated measure of combined activity interference on a numerical scale of 0-10, with higher scores representing greater activity interference. We collected ratings on how much pain interfered over the past 24 hours with 1) General activity, 2) Mood, 3) Walking ability, 4) Normal work, 5) Relations with other people, 6) Sleep, and 7) Enjoyment of life on a scale of 0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes. The table represents combined mean scores between groups. These ratings were collected at 3 months after start of the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Disability Index (PDI)Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-UpRating scales designed to measure levels of pain disability, or the degree to which pain is preventing a patient from doing what they normally would be doing, or doing it as well as they normally would on a 7-item scale of 0-10 ranging from 0-70 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-UpMeasures mood on a 14-item scale ranging from 0 to 42 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome
Pain Detect Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire (painDETECT)Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-UpMeasures the presence of neuropathic pain on a scale ranging from 1 to 38 on ratings of 'never to very strongly' with higher scores meaning a worse outcome
Symptom Impact Questionnaire (SIQR)Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-UpMeasures 20 pain symptoms and function on a scale of 0-10 with scores ranging from 0 to 200 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-UpMeasures the subject's overall belief about the efficacy of treatment on a 7-point categorical verbal rating scale. The scale ranges from (1) no change or condition has gotten worse to (7) a great deal better and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-UpMeasures thoughts and feelings when patient is experiencing pain on a 13-item scale ranging from 0-52 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome and higher catastrophizing
Satisfaction and Qualitative Questions3-month Follow-upA satisfaction questionnaire was developed for this study specifically related to use of the pain management device (Quell) and use of the study app. Ten items related to use of the device and five items were related to use of the smartphone study app all rated on a scale of 0 (worse) to 10 (better). Below are group differences on How willing would you be to using the Quell in the future? rated from 0=Not at all willing to 10=Very willing. This questionnaire was only administered at the end of the trial.
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-UpSet of psychophysical methods used to quantify somatosensory function. Combined hypersensitivity measure that measures responses to repeated touch, mechanical/pressure pain assessment, and cold pain assessment. Overall sensitivity based on z scores categorized into high and low sensitivity. Higher scores represent less sensitivity. The mean score is 0.
The Brief Pain Inventory Pain Intensity Scale (BPI)Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-UpAverage pain on a scale of 0-10 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome
MasterMyPain AppDaily ratings over 3-monthsDaily ratings of pain related factors on smartphone pain app on a scale of 0-10 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome. Multiple daily assessments were averaged for mean and standard deviation scores.
Healthcare UtilizationChanges from Baseline to 3-month Follow-UpMonthly clinic and ED visits

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
High Intensity Stimulation
Patients will be randomly assigned to the High Intensity Quell group and will receive higher intensity stimulation every day for 12 weeks. High Intensity Quell: Participants will receive 1 hour of continuous stimulation during each therapy session. Subjects are asked to complete a minimum of 3 sessions per day.
58
Low Intensity Stimulation
Patients will be randomly assigned to the Low intensity Quell group and will receive lower intensity stimulation every day for 12 weeks. Low Intensity Quell: Participants will receive only three 2-minute periods of stimulation (at 0, 28, 58 minutes) during each 60-minute therapeutic session. Subjects are asked to complete a minimum of 3 sessions per day.
57
Total115

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHigh Intensity StimulationLow Intensity StimulationTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants16 Participants28 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
46 Participants41 Participants87 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
52 Participants49 Participants101 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
6 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
43 Participants44 Participants87 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
52 Participants45 Participants97 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
5 Participants12 Participants17 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Other
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 580 / 57
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 5814 / 57
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 580 / 57

Outcome results

Primary

The Brief Pain Inventory Interference Scale (BPI)

This is a validated measure of combined activity interference on a numerical scale of 0-10, with higher scores representing greater activity interference. We collected ratings on how much pain interfered over the past 24 hours with 1) General activity, 2) Mood, 3) Walking ability, 4) Normal work, 5) Relations with other people, 6) Sleep, and 7) Enjoyment of life on a scale of 0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes. The table represents combined mean scores between groups. These ratings were collected at 3 months after start of the study.

Time frame: Between group differences at 3-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Intensity StimulationThe Brief Pain Inventory Interference Scale (BPI)5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Low Intensity StimulationThe Brief Pain Inventory Interference Scale (BPI)5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Healthcare Utilization

Monthly clinic and ED visits

Time frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Intensity StimulationHealthcare UtilizationClinic visits1.3 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 1.1
High Intensity StimulationHealthcare UtilizationHospital visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.2
Low Intensity StimulationHealthcare UtilizationClinic visits1.6 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 1.7
Low Intensity StimulationHealthcare UtilizationHospital visits0.1 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.2
Secondary

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

Measures mood on a 14-item scale ranging from 0 to 42 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome

Time frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Intensity StimulationHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)19.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Low Intensity StimulationHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)16.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Secondary

MasterMyPain App

Daily ratings of pain related factors on smartphone pain app on a scale of 0-10 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome. Multiple daily assessments were averaged for mean and standard deviation scores.

Time frame: Daily ratings over 3-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Intensity StimulationMasterMyPain App3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Low Intensity StimulationMasterMyPain App5.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Secondary

Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

Measures thoughts and feelings when patient is experiencing pain on a 13-item scale ranging from 0-52 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome and higher catastrophizing

Time frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Intensity StimulationPain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)25.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6
Low Intensity StimulationPain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)24.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
Secondary

Pain Detect Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire (painDETECT)

Measures the presence of neuropathic pain on a scale ranging from 1 to 38 on ratings of 'never to very strongly' with higher scores meaning a worse outcome

Time frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Intensity StimulationPain Detect Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire (painDETECT)16.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Low Intensity StimulationPain Detect Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire (painDETECT)16.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
Secondary

Pain Disability Index (PDI)

Rating scales designed to measure levels of pain disability, or the degree to which pain is preventing a patient from doing what they normally would be doing, or doing it as well as they normally would on a 7-item scale of 0-10 ranging from 0-70 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome

Time frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Intensity StimulationPain Disability Index (PDI)38.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
Low Intensity StimulationPain Disability Index (PDI)36.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
Secondary

Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

Measures the subject's overall belief about the efficacy of treatment on a 7-point categorical verbal rating scale. The scale ranges from (1) no change or condition has gotten worse to (7) a great deal better and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference.

Time frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Intensity StimulationPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Low Intensity StimulationPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Secondary

Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)

Set of psychophysical methods used to quantify somatosensory function. Combined hypersensitivity measure that measures responses to repeated touch, mechanical/pressure pain assessment, and cold pain assessment. Overall sensitivity based on z scores categorized into high and low sensitivity. Higher scores represent less sensitivity. The mean score is 0.

Time frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Intensity StimulationQuantitative Sensory Testing (QST)0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Low Intensity StimulationQuantitative Sensory Testing (QST)0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Secondary

Satisfaction and Qualitative Questions

A satisfaction questionnaire was developed for this study specifically related to use of the pain management device (Quell) and use of the study app. Ten items related to use of the device and five items were related to use of the smartphone study app all rated on a scale of 0 (worse) to 10 (better). Below are group differences on How willing would you be to using the Quell in the future? rated from 0=Not at all willing to 10=Very willing. This questionnaire was only administered at the end of the trial.

Time frame: 3-month Follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Intensity StimulationSatisfaction and Qualitative Questions7.6 score on a 0-10 scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Low Intensity StimulationSatisfaction and Qualitative Questions7.4 score on a 0-10 scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Symptom Impact Questionnaire (SIQR)

Measures 20 pain symptoms and function on a scale of 0-10 with scores ranging from 0 to 200 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome

Time frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Intensity StimulationSymptom Impact Questionnaire (SIQR)115.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.4
Low Intensity StimulationSymptom Impact Questionnaire (SIQR)106.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 38.9
Secondary

The Brief Pain Inventory Pain Intensity Scale (BPI)

Average pain on a scale of 0-10 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome

Time frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Intensity StimulationThe Brief Pain Inventory Pain Intensity Scale (BPI)-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Low Intensity StimulationThe Brief Pain Inventory Pain Intensity Scale (BPI)-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026