Skip to content

The Management of RT-induced Hyposalivation Using LLLT

The Management of Radiotherapy-induced Hyposalivation Using Low-level Laser Therapy: A Case Series.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05538169
Acronym
REACH-LLLT
Enrollment
10
Registered
2022-09-13
Start date
2022-01-03
Completion date
2023-10-01
Last updated
2023-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Cancer

Brief summary

The primary purpose is to evaluate the effectiveness of photobiomodulation laser application in the management of patients with radiotherapy-induced hyposalivation. Secondary, to assess the changes in the scores of the patient's oral health-related quality of life using validated measurements.

Detailed description

Head and neck cancer is a general term used to describe epithelial malignancies in the oral cavity, paranasal sinuses, nasal cavity, pharynx, and larynx. These malignancies are often presented as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck with tobacco and alcohol consumption remaining the two main risk factors. In addition, human papillomavirus has been identified as another risk factor in a limited subset of these malignancies. More specifically, oral cancer accounts for 2%-4% of all cancer worldwide with 90% of these cases presented as SSC worldwide compared to 44.8% in Saudi Arabia. Clinically, patients often presented with white and/or red patches, hoarseness, non-healed ulcers, throat pain, and painless cervical lump which may persist for more than 3 weeks period. Most head & neck cancer patients who received radiotherapy are likely to experience xerostomia and salivary glands hypofunction, mucositis, and possibly the loss of taste. Furthermore, the effect of hyposalivation is not only limited to taste dysfunction but also associated with opportunistic infections, difficulty in chewing and speaking, rapid progression of caries, and oral mucositis. All these secondary complications are usually associated with pain and discomfort which will heavily affect the patient quality of life if they are untreated. Treatment options include moisturizing agents or artificial saliva which have a palliative effect however they are not preferred nor accepted by most patients. The outcome of low-level laser therapy usage on cancer patients is well documented and well established in the literature. The vast majority of the results suggest that this therapy is an effective treatment option to stimulate salivary glands flow and decrease xerostomia/hyposalivation symptoms. In the present study, the efficiency of this treatment option will be tested as well as the changes in the patient's quality of life during and after the radiation treatment.

Interventions

DEVICElow-level laser diode (Pioon Laser)

Settings: the spot tip area of this tool is 0.088 cm2, semi-conductor diode, with a wavelength of 980 nm (near infrared), 200 mW output power, 1.97W/cm2 of power density, 3 J energy per point and application time 15 seconds per point\]. * PBM will apply punctually, in continuous emissions. * Extra-oral points: six points on each parotid gland, three points on each submandibular gland. * Intra-oral points: two points on each sublingual gland. * A total of 22 points will be applied in each session.

Sponsors

King Saud University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A prospective case series of patients who have received radiotherapy for SCC of the head and neck

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18 and above * Clinically diagnosed with hyposalivation \[an unstimulated salivary flow rate of ≤ 0.1ml per minute\] (31) due to recent radiation therapy of SCC of the head and neck.

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals with systemic diseases that could affect the salivary glands function such as (e.g. Sjogren syndrome) and medications (e.g. beta-blockers and diuretics for hypertension). * Individuals who had an allergy to toluidine blue stain.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rate12 weeksThe unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rate (ml/minute) will be collected at three different time periods: (T1) the first visit and before applying the laser, (T2) the 8th visit and after using the laser, and (T3) the re-evaluation visit after two months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Xerostomia assessment12 weeksXerostomia will be analysed at (T1) first visit, (T2) 8th visit, and (T3) at the re-evaluation visit using the Arabic version of Xerostomia Inventory, which is assessed by a 4-point scale (from never = 0 to always = 3).
Dysgeusia assessment12 weeksDysgeusia will be analysed at (T1) first visit, (T2) 8th visit, and (T3) at the re-evaluation visit using the 11-item Dysguesia Questionnaire, which is assessed by a mix of choices (e.g. yes or no) and 4-point scale for each question (little, tolerably, a lot or don't rememeber).
Quality of life assessment12 weeksThe Oral health-related quality of life (OHQoL) will be measured at (T1) first visit, (T2) 8th visit, and (T3) at the re-evaluation visit using the validated Arabic version of Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-5), which is which is assessed by a 5-point scale (from never = 0 to always = 4).

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026