Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Pitavastatin and PCSK9 Inhibitors in Liver Transplant Patients

Efficacy and Safety of Pitavastatin and PCSK9 Inhibitors in Liver Transplant Patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05537948
Acronym
PINTL
Enrollment
59
Registered
2022-09-13
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
2025-01-31
Last updated
2025-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dyslipidemias, Hyperlipidemias, Liver Transplant Disorder, Immunosuppression, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Statins

Keywords

Dyslipidemias, Hyperlipidemias, Liver Transplant Disorder, Immunosuppression, Immunosuppressive therapy, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, pitavastatin, statins, PCSK9, PCSK9 Inhibitors, evolocumab, alirocumab

Brief summary

To study the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin and PCSK9 inhibitors in liver transplant patients on ongoing immunosuppressive therapy.

Detailed description

1. Evaluate the efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering therapy in real clinical practice. 2. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin in patients undergoing liver transplantation and receiving immunosuppressive therapy. 3. Evaluate the efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibitors in patients undergoing liver transplantation and receiving immunosuppressive therapy. 4. To compare the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin and a PCSK9 inhibitor in patients undergoing liver transplantation and receiving immunosuppressive therapy.

Interventions

DRUGPitavastatin

First phase (6 months): Patients will be randomized 1:1 into 2 groups: 1. pitavastatin monotherapy 2. monotherapy with a PCSK9 inhibitor (evolocumab 140 mg or alirocumab 150 mg once every 2 weeks subcutaneously) In the group of Pitavastatin: Pitavastatin at visit 0 will be prescribed at a dose of 2 mg, after 1 month in the absence of side effects against the background of ongoing therapy, the dose will be increased to 4 mg. The lipid profile and safety of the therapy will be assessed in 1, 3 and 6 months after the start of the therapy. When triglyceride levels rise above 5.7 mmol/l in two consecutive analyzes, the addition of fenofibrate may be considered. Second phase (6 months): If the target level of LDL-C is not achieved during monotherapy with pitavastatin, the patient will be asked to continue treatment with combined lipid-lowering therapy (pitavastatin + PCSK9 inhibitor). There will be visits on the 7th, 9th and 12th months.

First phase (6 months): Patients will be randomized 1:1 into 2 groups: 1. pitavastatin monotherapy 2. monotherapy with a PCSK9 inhibitor (evolocumab 140 mg or alirocumab 150 mg once every 2 weeks subcutaneously) In the group of PCSK9 inhibitors:The lipid profile and safety of the therapy will be assessed in 1, 3 and 6 months after the start of the therapy. When triglyceride levels rise above 5.7 mmol/l in two consecutive analyzes, the addition of fenofibrate may be considered. Second phase (6 months): If the target level of LDL-C is not achieved during monotherapy with a PCSK9 inhibitor, the patient will be asked to continue treatment with combined lipid-lowering therapy (pitavastatin + PCSK9 inhibitor). Pitavastatin will initially be prescribed at a dose of 2 mg, after 1 month. in the absence of side effects against the background of ongoing therapy, the dose will be increased to 4 mg. There will be visits on the 7th, 9th and 12th months.

Sponsors

National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

phase 1: randomized, prospective, single-center, parallel-group study phase 2: observational study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* signed informed consent to participate in the study; * a history of liver transplantation for any reason; * immunosuppressive therapy; * the presence of hyperlipidemia, requiring the prescription of lipid-lowering therapy according to the clinical guidelines of the European Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis (EAS) 2019 * failure to achieve the target level of LDL-C against the background of current lipid-lowering therapy; * if the patient within 1 month before randomization took lipid-lowering therapy, then the absence of side effects against the background of previous lipid-lowering therapy.

Exclusion criteria

* treatment with PCSK9 in previous 6 months; * current treatment in the form of lipoprotein apheresis; * heart failure IV NYHA; * active infectious disease, severe hematological, metabolic, gastrointestinal or endocrine dysfunctions (for example, uncontrolled thyroid dysfunction) at the time of the screening or randomization visits; * the presence of an oncological disease, with the exception of hepatocellular carcinoma, which served as the reason for liver transplantation; * CFR\<15ml/min/1,73m2; * pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the proportion of patients who have reached the target level of LDL-C by month 3 of study therapymonth 3 of study therapythe proportion of patients who have reached the target level of LDL-C
absolute change in LDL-C from baseline by months 1 and 3 of study therapymonths 1 and 3 of study therapyabsolute change in LDL-C from baseline
percent change in LDL-C from baseline at months 1 and 3 of study therapymonths 1 and 3 of study therapypercent change in LDL-C from baseline
the proportion of patients who have reached the target level of LDL-C by month 1 of study therapymonth 1 of study therapythe proportion of patients who have reached the target level of LDL-C

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the timing of achieving the target level of LDL-C at months 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, 12 of study therapymonths 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, 12 of study therapythe timing of achieving the target level of LDL-C
percent of patients with target level of LDL-C at months 6 and 12 of study therapymonths 6 and 12 of study therapypercent of patients with target level of LDL-C

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
the proportion of patients with increased level of creatine phosphokinase (more than 4 times of the upper limit normal (ULN)) at months 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, 12 of study therapymonths 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, 12 of study therapythe proportion of patients with increased level of creatine phosphokinase (more than 4 times of the upper limit normal (ULN))
the proportion of patients with increase higer than the upper limit normal (ULN) of one of the parameters in blood: ALT, AST, GGT, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin at months 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, 12 of study therapymonths 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, 12 of study therapythe proportion of patients with increase higer than the upper limit normal (ULN) of one of the parameters in blood: ALT, AST, GGT, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin

Countries

Russia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026