Skip to content

Effect of Music on Cardiopulmonary Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure Patients

Effect of Music on Cardiopulmonary Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05537467
Acronym
MUSIC-CPX
Enrollment
40
Registered
2022-09-13
Start date
2022-09-13
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

Cardiopulmonary stress test, Exercise stress test, Cardiology, Exercise performance, Heart failure

Brief summary

The study aims to assess the effect of music on the heart resulting in a change in their exercise capacity among systolic heart failure patients undergoing Cardiopulmonary Exercise testing.

Detailed description

Studies have previously shown the positive impact of music on the autonomic nervous system, neurohormonal and cardiovascular system. In addition, a previously published study found a positive impact of music resulting in an improvement of quality of life (QOL) in heart failure patients. Proposed mechanisms of benefit of music in heart failure include a reduction in sympathetic activity, and modulation of parasympathetic activity. Further, reduction in anxiety and arterial relaxation are thought to be beneficial effects of music. It is hypothesized that heart failure patients listening to music would have better exercise stress test performance and increased exercise time. Adult patients with systolic heart failure scheduled to undergo Cardiopulmonary Exercise (CPX) testing at the Gill Heart and Vascular Institute will be recruited. While the patients are undergoing Cardiopulmonary exercise testing, patients randomized to the 'music arm' will listen to pre-selected upbeat music during their duration of the exercise testing via headphones that will be provided to patients by the study personnel. The patients who are randomized to 'non-music arm' in which their headphones will not play music and the patients will perform the cardiopulmonary exercise testing as usual. Standard clinical care is performing cardiopulmonary exercise testing without any music. The investigators will then compare the results of CPX study of the two arms to assess the impact of music on exercise performance.

Interventions

OTHERMusic

Patients randomized to the music group will listen to upbeat music using headphones.

Sponsors

Maya Ignaszewski
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults (age \>18 years) * Able to consent * English speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Severe hearing deficiency * Unable to exercise.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Ventilatory Equivalent of CO2 (VE/VCO2)15 minutes (at baseline 8 breaths, Anaerobic Threshold 8 breaths, Peak 8 Breaths)Assess above performance parameters in CPX and compare between Music and Non-Music arm
Difference in CO2 production (VCO2) [L/min]15 minutes (at baseline 8 breaths, Anaerobic Threshold 8 breaths, Peak 8 Breaths)Assess above performance parameters in CPX and compare between Music and Non-Music arm.
Difference in respiratory exchange ratio (RER)15 minutes (at baseline 8 breaths, Anaerobic Threshold 8 breaths, Peak 8 Breaths)Assess above performance parameters in CPX and compare between Music and Non-Music arm.
Difference in Minute Ventilation (VE) [L/min]15 minutes (at baseline 8 breaths, Anaerobic Threshold 8 breaths, Peak 8 Breaths)Assess above performance parameters in CPX and compare between Music and Non-Music arm
Difference in Ventilatory Threshold (VT) [L]15 minutes (at baseline 8 breaths, Anaerobic Threshold 8 breaths, Peak 8 Breaths)Assess above performance parameters in CPX and compare between Music and Non-Music arm
Difference in respiratory rate (RR) [Breaths per minute]15 minutes (at baseline 8 breaths, Anaerobic Threshold 8 breaths, Peak 8 Breaths)Assess above performance parameters in CPX and compare between Music and Non-Music arm
Difference in O2 consumption (VO2) [L/min]15 minutes (at baseline 8 breaths, Anaerobic Threshold 8 breaths, Peak 8 Breaths)Assess above performance parameters in CPX and compare between Music and Non-Music arm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in O2 Pulse [ml]15 minutes (at baseline 8 breaths, Anaerobic Threshold 8 breaths, Peak 8 Breaths)Assess above performance parameters in CPX and compare between Music and Non-Music arm
Difference in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]15 minutes (at baseline 8 breaths, Anaerobic Threshold 8 breaths, Peak 8 Breaths)Assess above performance parameters in CPX and compare between Music and Non-Music arm
Difference in Exercise time [mm:ss]15 minutes (Start to end of CPX study)Compare the CPX parameter between Music and Non-Music Arm
Difference in Work rate [watt]15 minutes (Start to end of each CPX study)Compare the CPX parameter between Music and Non-Music Arm
Difference in Heart Rate [Beats per minute]15 minutes (at baseline 8 breaths, Anaerobic Threshold 8 breaths, Peak 8 Breaths)Assess above performance parameters in CPX and compare between Music and Non-Music arm

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactPeggy J Hardesty, APRN, MSN
peggy.hardesty@uky.edu859-323-0295
Backup ContactJennifer R Isaacs, MS, MS
jennifer.isaacs@uky.edu859-323-4738

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026