Skip to content

Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation of Celiac Ganglion for Pain Management and Improvement of Quality of Life in Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Celiac Ganglion for Pain Management and Improvement of Quality of Life in Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05535894
Enrollment
19
Registered
2022-09-10
Start date
2022-08-10
Completion date
2025-08-30
Last updated
2026-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Cancer

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the EUS-RFA in terms of efficacy for pain management and improvement in quality-of-life parameters for patients with advanced inoperable pancreatic cancer. The primary objectives of this study are to 1) evaluate the utility of EUS-RFA for pain control and improvement in quality-of-life parameters for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer; 2) to measure the reduction of analgesic medications' requirements in patients affected by inoperable pancreatic cancer.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAblation of Celiac Ganglion

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Celiac Ganglion

Sponsors

West Virginia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer based on clinical, radiological, or pathological assessment; * Referred for abdominal and/or back pain due to pancreatic cancer; * No prior history of RFA; * Cancer pain unresponsive to the WHO 3-step analgesic ladder; * Willingness to consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are not willing to give informed consent or agree to participate in the study * Surgically resectable pancreatic cancer; * Abdominal pain with etiology other than pancreatic malignancy; * Evidence of concurrent infection; * Patients with irreversible coagulopathy international normalized ratio \>1.5 or platelet count \<50,000/mm3), * Patients with a preliminary diagnosis of adenocarcinoma are not possible established with intraprocedural at EUS-guided FNA.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain severity-BPIFrom Baseline up to 3 MonthsChange in severity of pain will be assessed using a standardized the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible).
Pain severity-VASFrom Baseline up to 3 MonthsChange in severity of pain will be assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible).
Pain severity-NRSFrom Baseline up to 3 MonthsChange in severity of pain will be assessed using numerical rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible).
Quality of Life (EORTC PAN26)From Baseline up to 3 MonthsChanges in Quality of Life as scored with the Europen Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire pancreatic cancer module (PAN26). This measure uses a Likert type scale 1-4 with 1=better and 4=worse.
Quality of Life (EORTC C30)From Baseline up to 3 MonthsChanges in Quality of Life as scored with the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire core questionnaire (C30). This measure uses a Likert type scale 1-4 with 1=better and 4=worse.
Quality of Life (NFHSI)From Baseline up to 3 MonthsChanges in Quality of Life as scored with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Symptom Index (NFHSI). This measure uses a Likert type scale 0-4 with 0=no symptoms and 4= worst symptoms.
Concomitant Analgesic/Narcotic UseFrom Baseline up to 3 MonthsPercent change in concomitant analgesic therapy will be evaluated. Details on the dose and frequency of opioid medications administered within 24 hours before the intervention will be collected and at different follow-up intervals after the procedure. The total dose of analgesic therapy administered will then be converted into an oral morphine equivalent dose for comparison.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORShailendra Singh, MD

West Virginia University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 29, 2026