Skip to content

Single Port Robotic Lung Anatomical Resection

Pilot Study of Single Port Robotic Surgery for Anatomical Lung Resection

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05535712
Enrollment
35
Registered
2022-09-10
Start date
2022-10-07
Completion date
2024-05-05
Last updated
2023-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Robotic Surgical Procedure

Keywords

Early Stage Lung Cancer, Da Vinci SP, Robotic Thoracic Surgery

Brief summary

This is the first human clinical study for explore the feasibility of lung anatomic resection through Da Vinci SP surgical platform

Detailed description

During the past several years, minimally invasive thoracic surgery has evolved from thoracoscopic approaches using 3 -4 ports to a single incision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) techniques. Recently, the experience acquired with the uniportal VATS technique through the intercostal space has allowed the development of a uniportal VATS subxiphoid or subcostal approach for major pulmonary resections. The advantage of using a subxiphoid or subcostal entry is to reduce pain by avoiding possible trauma of intercostal nerves caused by thoracic incisions. However, the longer distance from the subxiphoid or subcostal incision to the hilum makes this approach more difficult to perform anatomical pulmonary resections.During this same period of evolution into uniportal VATS surgery, robotic thoracic surgery has gained popularity as an alternative to traditional VATS. The advantages of robotics are the ability to perform surgery more precisely with articulated or wristed instruments, motion scaling, and tremor filtration, as well as improved visualization thanks to 3D high-definition video. However, currently 4 -5 incisions are still necessary to perform anatomic robotic resections.Recently, there has been a convergence of these two trends-uniportal surgery and robotic-assisted surgery-and has resulted in a single port robotic system, the da Vinci SP by Intuitive Surgical Cooperation. For this new platform, investigators plan to practice in thoracic anatomic lung resection

Interventions

DEVICELung Anatomic Resection (Da Vinci SP)

To evaluate the performance and safety of the da Vinci SP® Surgical System in anatomical lung resection

Sponsors

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

clinical lung cancer who receive Da Vinci sp robotic surgery

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \>20 and \<75 years-old 2. Willing and able to provide informed consent 3. ASA≤ 3 4. The subject is undergoing the following procedures 1. diagnosis with of clinical stage I lung cancer 2. The primary tumor should be less than ≤4cm diameter and ≥ 2 cm away from the origin of the associated lobar bronchus 5. Preoperative platelet count 150-400 (1000/ uL)

Exclusion criteria

1. Congestive heart failure (NHYA \> II) 2. Subjects with a known bleeding or clotting disorder 3. Subjects actively receiving therapeutic dose anticoagulation or anti-platelet medications at the time of operation 4. Subjects under immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive regimen (e.g. transplant patient, steroid requirement) within 30 days prior to the planned surgery 5. Subjects with pulmonary hypertension 6. In need of extended resection (e.g. Chest wall, Carina, major vessel, bilobectomy) and reconstruction (e.g. Sleeve resection, bronchoplasty, angioplasty) 7. Previous ipsilateral thoracic surgery or sternotomy 8. Uncontrolled illness 6 months prior to planned surgical procedure including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements 9. Previous neoadjuvant medical and/or radiation therapy 10. Subject has a contraindication for general anesthesia or surgery 11. Life expectancy \< 6 months 12. Anatomy determined intra-operatively to be unsuitable for minimally invasive surgery 13. Subjects belong to vulnerable population (e.g., pregnancy or breastfeeding) 14. International normalized ratio, INR \>1.4 15. Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time , APTT \>35 -

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of conversion rateDuring SurgeryThe primary performance endpoint will be assessed as the ability to successfully complete the planned anatomic resection procedure with the da Vinci SP System, with no conversion to thoracoscopic, multi-port robotic, or open surgery. Usage of additional assistant port(s) is not considered a conversion.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Treatment Related Adverse EventsOne YearThe primary safety endpoint will be assessed as the incidence of all intra-operative and post-operative adverse events that occur within the study follow-up period. Complications are assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, CTCAE.
Peri-operative parametersFrom Surgery to ward,2- dayOperation time (minute), docking time (minute), console time(minute), anesthesia time(minute), Time from recovery room to ward (minute)
Peri-operative parameters: blood loss relatedDuring surgerywhich include bloods loss(ml) during operation, blood transfusion (ml) during surgery
Hospitalization parametersDuring Hospitalization, an average of 4 dayswhich include, length of hospital stay (day)
Operative related complications during hospitalizationDuring Hospitalization, an average of 4 dayswhich include in-hospital mortality and morbidity, reasons need for reoperation, unplanned procedure after surgery
Patient disposition immediately after surgeryDuring Hospitalization, an average of 1 dayICU, ward

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Questionnaire assessment (1)Through study completion, an average of 1 yearEnrolled subjects would be assessed by pain scale score at baseline (preoperatively), during inpatient phase. Neuropathic pain assessment (Assessment of post-VATS surgery neuralgia- pain DETECT Questionnaire), performed during inpatient phase (Post-operation 1 day, 2 days and day of discharge) and 1 week, 1,3,6,12 months after discharge.
Questionnaire assessment (2)Through study completion, an average of 1 yearEnrolled subjects would be assessed by numbness score at baseline (preoperatively), during inpatient phase. Neuropathic pain assessment (Assessment of post-VATS surgery neuralgia- pain DETECT Questionnaire), performed during inpatient phase (Post-operation 1 day, 2 days and day of discharge) and 1 week, 1,3,6,12 months after discharge.
90-day follow up (1)Post-operative data through 90-day follow-upComplications (assed according to CTCAE)
Pathological ReportPost-operative data through 30-day follow-uppathologic tumor staging, surgical margins
90-day Follow up (2)Post-operative data through 90-day follow-upUnplanned procedure-related reoperations or readmissions, mortality
30-day follow-upPost-operative data through 30-day follow-upComplications (assed according to CTCAE)

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 27, 2026