Skip to content

Evaluation of the Effects of Silk and Polyester Suture on Postoperative Complications

Evaluation of the Effects of Silk and Polyester Suture on Postoperative Complications in Lower Impacted Third Molar Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05534204
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-09-09
Start date
2020-04-16
Completion date
2022-06-01
Last updated
2023-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impacted Third Molar Tooth

Brief summary

Some undesirable complications such as pain, swelling, trismus, paresthesia, hematoma, infection and, albeit rare, fractures may occur after lower impacted wisdom tooth surgery. More effective wound closure methods with fewer complications have positive effects on postoperative recovery. Suturing is the most commonly used wound closure technique after lower impacted wisdom tooth surgery. Suturing, which is the last step of the operation, contributes to wound healing in order to reposition and stabilize the tissue components and to control bleeding. In our study, it was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of silk and polyester sutures used in wound closure techniques, which are frequently used in lower impacted wisdom teeth surgery.

Detailed description

This randomized, single-blind, split-mouth study was carried out on 30 patients who applied to Van Yuzuncu Yıl University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral, Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery. Silk suture was used on one side of the patients and polyester suture was used on the other side. When the patients first applied to the clinic, their anamnesis was taken and panoramic images were taken after clinical evaluations were made. Evaluations were made with preoperative face measurements (for evaluation of swelling), maximum mouth opening (for evaluation of trismus) and periodontal measurements for all patients. The mentioned measurements and evaluations were repeated on the 2nd and 7th postoperative days. In addition, postoperative pain was evaluated with the VAS scale. The same surgical procedure was performed by the same surgeon for all patients. After local anesthesia (2ml of 80 mg Articaine hydrochloride + 0.02mg Epinephrine bitartrate) a 3-corner flap containing the vertical incision passing through the mesial of the number 7 was lifted, the bone removed under saline cooling and the teeth were separated when needed. Afterwards, the extraction sockets will be irrigated with saline to control bleeding, and the area is closed primarily with silk or polyester suture material.

Interventions

PROCEDURESilk suture

Patients with bilateral impacted lower third molars will have operations for both sides. On one side for primarily closure after operation silk suture will be used.

Patients with bilateral impacted lower third molars will have operations for both side. On one side for primarily closure after operation polyester suture will be used.

Sponsors

Yuzuncu Yil University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals aged 18 years and over * Impacted teeth in mesial and horizontal positions and in class 2 and class B according to Pell & Gregory classification, * Asymptomatic impacted teeth, * Individuals who is coming to control and fill in the given and requested forms, * Individuals with an operation time of 30 minutes or less

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic disease, * Smoking, * Pregnancy or breastfeeding, * Allergy to the drugs to be used in the study, * Using any additional medication that may affect the outcome of the study, * Using medication until 2 weeks before the operations, * Post-operative alveolitis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative PainPostoperative1st dayPatients were requested to mark their pain intensity on a pain assessment form using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging between 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026