Skip to content

Resistive Breathing Versus Inspiratory Hold Technique in Patients With Chronic Bronchitis

Comparison of Resistive Breathing Versus Inspiratory Hold Technique in Patients With Chronic Bronchitis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05533931
Enrollment
26
Registered
2022-09-09
Start date
2022-09-30
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2022-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Bronchitis

Keywords

lung infection, resistive breathing, inspiratory hold technique

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to determine the importance and impact of resistive breathing techniques versus inspiratory hold techniques in patients with chronic bronchitis and specially to find out if there are any changes seen in results measured via the incentive spirometer.

Detailed description

Chronic Bronchitis (CB) is defined as a chronic cough and sputum production for at least 3 months a year for 2 consecutive years. It is covered under the umbrella term of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Chronic bronchitis is thought to be caused by overproduction and hypersecretion of mucus by goblet cells. Epithelial cells lining the airway response to toxic, infectious stimuli by releasing inflammatory mediators and e.g. pro-inflammatory cytokines. During an acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, the bronchial mucous membrane becomes hyperemic and edematous with diminished bronchial mucociliary function. This, in turn, leads to airflow impediment because of luminal obstruction to small airways. The airways become clogged by debris and this further increases the irritation. The characteristic cough of bronchitis is caused by the copious secretion of mucus in chronic bronchitis. Pseudostratified epithelium, highlighting the pseudostratified epithelial cells, goblets cells (shown in blue), then underlying connective tissue.(3) To determine the importance and impact of resistive breathing techniques versus inspiratory hold techniques in patients with chronic bronchitis and specially to find out if there are any changes seen in results measured via incentive spirometer. There are few studies done over it whereas purpose of this research work is to compare these techniques to get better results.

Interventions

OTHERResistive Breathing Training group

The patients performed two sessions each of 15 minutes session of resistive breathing for four days a week for six weeks using an inspiratory resistive device. Ask patient to take long slow inspirations while breathing through the resistive device

OTHERinspiratory hold technique

With the patient in a comfortable position such as side lying or reclined, the therapist may assist the patient by placing both hands on abdominal area to provide proprioceptive feedback. Then in a relaxed tone of voice therapist instructs the patient to sniff quickly through the nose three times with slow, relaxed exhalations

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • Diagnosed with chronic bronchitis * Clinically stable patients. * Both genders. * Age 45 to 60 years. * Pink puffers included in this study * Clients that are involved in research are not allowed for other interventional therapies. They can take their regular medications. * Patients diagnosed at least 2 years ago with bronchitis.

Exclusion criteria

* • Presence of any genetic disorders (cystic fibrosis). * Recent spinal / chest surgery * Cardiac issues * Fractures of vertebra caused by osteoporosis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
oxygen saturationChanges will be assessed at baseline, 3rd week and 6th weeks measuredamount of oxygen traveling through your body with your red blood cells. Changes will be assessed at baseline, 3rd week and 6th weeks measured
Forced expiratory volume in one secondChanges will be assessed at baseline, 3rd week and 6th weeks measuredamount of air expired in first one second. Changes will be assessed at baseline, 3rd week and 6th weeks measured
Forced vital capacityChanges will be assessed at baseline, 3rd week and 6th weeks measuredthe total amount of air exhaled during the FEV test. Changes will be assessed at baseline, 3rd week and 6th weeks measured
FEV1/FVC ratio6 weeksthe amount of air exhaled in the first second divided by all of the air exhaled during a maximal exhalation.
shortness of breath measured through borge scale of dyspneaChanges will be assessed at baseline, 3rd week and 6th weeks measuredshortness of breath. Changes will be assessed at baseline, 3rd week and 6th weeks measured
SGRQ questionnaireChanges will be assessed at baseline, 3rd week and 6th weeks measuredhow breathing problems effects quality of life . Changes will be assessed at baseline, 3rd week and 6th weeks measured

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Primary ContactGhazal Jamshaid, MS CPPT
ghazaljamshaid141@gmail.com03040404851

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026