Aortic Aneurysm, Failed Previous Infrarenal Repairs (Failed EVAR), Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysm, Pararenal Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm
Conditions
Keywords
surgeon-modified fenestrated stent grafts
Brief summary
The primary objective of the present study is to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and clinical outcomes of surgeon-modified fenestrated stent grafts used to treat patients with failed previous infrarenal repairs (failed EVAR) and complex aortic aneurysms (thoracoabdominal, juxtarenal, pararenal, and paravisceral aneurysms).
Detailed description
The study is a prospective, non-randomized evaluation of endovascular repair of patients with failed previous infrarenal repairs (failed EVAR) and complex thoracoabdominal/juxtarenal/pararenal/paravisceral aortic aneurysm repair, including those with penetrating ulcers and aneurysms resulting from aortic dissections, who (1) have anatomy that is not suitable for endovascular repair using grafts currently marketed in the United States, (2) are deemed unsafe to wait the required time necessary for commercial endograft manufacturing, and (3) are at high risk for open surgical repair. Depending on the location of the aneurysm, patients with failed EVAR and complex aortic pathology requiring fenestrated and branched endovascular repair will be treated with physician-modified Cook Zenith devices (Zenith Flex, Zenith Fenestrated stent graft (Zfen), Cook Alpha Thoracic Endovascular Graft, Cook dissection TX2), and their associated commercially approved ancillary components. Whenever possible, the Zenith fenestrated universal bifurcated device will be used for patients requiring repair down to the iliac arteries. The Gore Excluder Endoprosthesis or the Gore Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE) will be used whenever the Zenith universal bifurcated device is not available. Safety and effectiveness will be assessed acutely (i.e., treatment success and technical success), at 30 days (i.e., the rate of major adverse events (MAE)), at 6 months, at 12 months, and annually to 5 years (i.e., the proportion of treatment group subjects that achieve and maintain treatment success).
Interventions
DEVICESurgeon-Modified fenestrated stent grafts using Cook Zenith Platform (Zfen, TX2, Alpha Thoracic Endovascular Graft and Zenith Flex)
Depending on the location of the aneurysm, patients with failed EVAR and complex aortic pathology requiring fenestrated and branched endovascular repair will be treated with physician-modified Cook Zenith devices (Zenith Flex, Zenith Fenestrated stent graft (Zfen), Cook Alpha Thoracic Endovascular Graft, Cook dissection TX2), and their associated commercially approved ancillary components.
Sponsors
Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation
Jesse Manunga, MD
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
All participants will receive the same treatment modality (surgeon-modified fenestrated stent grafts).
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age: ≥ 18 years old * The subject has one or more of the following: 1\. An aneurysm with a maximum diameter of \> 5.5 cm (in men) and 5 cm (in women) or 2 times the normal diameter just proximal to the aneurysm using orthogonal (i.e, perpendicular to the centerline) measurements 2. Aneurysm with a history of growth \> 0.5 cm in 6 months or clinically indicated for repair based on symptoms 3. Symptomatic aneurysm 4. Ruptured aneurysm 6. Failed previous EVAR defined as type IA endoleak or increase in aneurysm sac size in the setting of proximal seal loss 7. Saccular aneurysm deemed by the treating vascular specialist at significant risk for rupture 8. High risk for open surgical repair based on any of the factors below: a. Anatomic i. Previous abdominal surgery ii. Previous left-sided thoracotomy (if the proposed open repair would require dissection of the thoracic aorta) iii. Previous aortic surgery b. Physiological high risk For this IDE, physiological risk will be assessed using two systems. First, this study will use the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS)/American Association for Vascular Surgery (AAVS) medical comorbidity grading system recommended for use by the SVS to describe the severity of medical comorbidities in patients with complex aortic aneurysm disease. However, as the current SVS/AAVS grading system has yet to be validated in prospective studies or in a large cohort of patients treated for aortic disease, the American Association of Anesthesiologists grading system will also be utilized due to its widely adopted use and simplicity although it relies on subjective parameters and lacks specific metrics that affect outcomes. * American Association of Anesthesiologists grading system: subjects with ASA scores of 3-5 will be considered for study inclusion though final subject approval will be at the discretion of the treating vascular specialist; subjects with ASA scores of 6 will be excluded. * SVS/AAVS grading system: high risk (8-20% mortality risk) subjects will be considered for study inclusion though final subject approval will be at the discretion of the treating vascular specialist; prohibitive high risk (31-70% mortality risk) subjects will be excluded. Medical Inclusion Criteria * American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system: subjects with ASA scores of 1-5 will be considered for study inclusion though final subject approval will be at the discretion of the treating vascular specialist; subjects with ASA scores of 6 will be excluded. SVS/AAVS grading system: low risk (0.12-1% mortality risk), medium risk (1.7-4.9% mortality risk), and high risk (8-20% mortality risk) subjects will be considered for study inclusion though final subject approval will be at the discretion of the treating vascular specialist; prohibitive high risk (31-70% mortality risk) subjects will be excluded. Anatomical Inclusion Criteria * Iliac or femoral access vessel morphology that is compatible with vascular access techniques, devices, or accessories, with or without use of a surgical conduit * Extent of aorta to be treated: infrarenal aortic aneurysms with \< 10 mm neck length, juxtarenal or pararenal aneurysms that include 1 or 2 renal arteries; paravisceral and extent IV-V thoracoabdominal aneurysms, Extent I-III thoracoabdominal aneurysm including those patients requiring a carotid-left subclavian bypass in order to achieve, at least, 20 mm of proximal landing zone * Non-aneurysmal aortic segment proximal to the aneurysm (neck) with a: 1. Minimum neck length of 20 mm 2. Diameter in the range of 20 mm - 38 mm 3. Angle less than 60 degrees relative to the axis of the aneurysm 4. Angle less than 60 degrees relative to the axis of the suprarenal aorta * Minimum branch vessel diameter of 5 mm or greater Iliac artery distal fixation site greater than 45 mm in length and diameter in the range of 8 mm to 17 mm
Exclusion criteria
* Age: \< 18 years old * Does not meet the above inclusion criteria * Can be treated in accordance with the instructions for use with a commercially approved and marketed endovascular prosthesis * Is eligible for enrollment in a manufacturer-sponsored IDE at the investigational site with the exception of percutaneous aortic valve surgery * Unwilling or unable to comply with the follow-up schedule * Inability or unwillingness of patient or patient's legally authorized representative to provide informed consent. * Subject is pregnant or breastfeeding * Any other circumstance or condition which, at the discretion of the sponsor-investigator, makes the patient unsuitable for inclusion Medical
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Prevention of aortic aneurysm related mortality and all cause mortality post intervention | 5 years | Primary outcome criteria: * Mortality related to primary aortic disease and intervention * All-cause mortality post intervention |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Issues associated with disease progression, branched instability, endoleak and other disabling complications as evaluated on post-operative follow up and radiographic images. | 5 years | Secondary outcome criteria (as evidenced on follow up imaging and laboratory tests): * Evidence of aortic disease progression (aneurysm growth \>/=5 mm) |
| Endoleak | 5 years | presence of any endoleak requiring intervention |
| Target vessels instability resulting in adverse events to the patient | 5 years | * mesenteric ischemia * renal failure |
| procedure related complication | 5 years | * stroke * Myocardial infarction * Paraplegia |
| Issues associated with device migration and failure | years | \- Device failure (migration \>/=10 mm) |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Backup ContactJoAnne Goldman
Primary ContactJesse Manunga, MD, FSVS, FACS
Outcome results
None listed