Skip to content

De-escalation Study for Stage IIa/IIb < 3 cm Seminoma

Prospective Therapeutic De-escalation and miRNA-M371 Biomarker Evaluation Phase II Study for Stage IIa/IIb < 3 cm Seminomas

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05529251
Acronym
EDEN
Enrollment
90
Registered
2022-09-07
Start date
2022-09-06
Completion date
2032-05-04
Last updated
2026-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Seminoma, Stage II

Keywords

De-escalation, Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, Carboplatin, Etoposide, Cisplatine, Micro-RNA-M371, PET scan, Overall survival, Biomarker, Efficacy, Progression free rate, Safety, Quality of life

Brief summary

Phase II, multicenter, prospective, randomized, non-comparative, de-escalation study. Patients with stage IIa/IIb \< 3 cm seminoma histologically proved after orchiectomy will be included in the study and will receive 1 cycle of Etoposide Cisplatine (EP) chemotherapy. Patients with negative week-3 PET-scan after the EP cycle, will be randomized (1:1 ratio, stratification according to the disease stage (stage IIa versus IIb seminoma)) to receive either radiotherapy (RT) boost on lymph nodes or 1 cycle of carboplatin AUC7 chemotherapy. Patients with positive week-3 PET-scan will received 3 additional cycles of EP chemotherapy. In parallel, eligible patients scheduled to receive standard lombo-aortic RT will be registered in an observational cohort.

Detailed description

Stage II seminoma is defined by the presence of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases. It concerns approximately 15% of patients with seminoma. The standard treatment for patients with stage IIa/b seminoma, after orchiectomy, is extended lumbo-aortic/ipsilateral iliac radiotherapy (RT). Performing chemotherapy (CT) with 3 courses of Bleomycin-Etoposide-Cisplatin (BEP) or 4 courses of Etoposide-Cisplatin (EP) is an alternative. The optimal treatment choice remains controversial. Both treatment modalities are associated with excellent efficacy but also acute and late toxicities. European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines recommended in equal measure CT and RT for stage IIa. A recent systematic review concluded that RT and cisplatin-based combination CT are equally effective in clinical stage IIa/IIb seminoma, with a trend in favor of chemotherapy in stage IIb because of lower relapse rate. However, due to the rarity of stage II seminoma, a sufficiently powered randomized trial comparing radiotherapy with chemotherapy is unlikely to be completed. De-escalation strategies are required to minimize acute and long-term toxicities while maintaining efficacy. De-escalated treatment for seminoma patients with stage IIb/IIC/III and good prognosis according to International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG), based on negative PET after 2 cycles of EP chemotherapy, is feasible and safe according to SEMITEP results (cohort 2). In case of negative PET, 1 additional cycle of CT with carboplatin AUC7 was administered. Furthermore, serum levels of microRNA (miR)-371a-3p (miRNA-M371) have been significantly associated with clinical stage, primary tumor size and response to treatment in testicular germ cell tumors, with sensitivity and specificity higher than those of classic markers (hCGt, LDH). However, further evaluations are needed before modifying clinical practices. We propose to conduct a multicenter, prospective, randomized, non-comparative, de-escalation phase II study in patients with stage IIa/IIb seminoma \< 3 cm, evaluating: * a more de-escalated CT treatment: 1 cycle of EP followed, in case of negative PET, by either a boost of RT on lymph node or 1 cycle of carboplatin AUC7 * the biomarker miRNA-M371 in therapeutic decision and correlation with PET. In parallel, eligible patients scheduled to receive standard lombo-aortic RT will be registered in an observational cohort.

Interventions

Radiotherapy boost 20 to 30 Gy, in daily 2 Gy fractions and 5 fractions per week : * 20 Gy if no more disease is visible (node \< 1 cm in large diameter) * 24 Gy for nodes \<= 2 cm * 30 Gy for nodes \> 2 cm

DRUGCarboplatin AUC7

Carboplatin at dose (mg) = AUC7 (mg/ml x min) x (DFG ml/min + 25)

DRUG3 cycles of EP

3 Cycles of EP chemotherapy, administred every 3 weeks following standard practice

Sponsors

Centre Leon Berard
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

* In case of negative week-3 (after 1 EP cyle) PET-scan: Randomization according to 2 arms 1. Boost of radiotherapy 20 to 30 Gray (Gy) (ARM A) 2. Carboplatin AUC7 chemotherapy (ARM B) * In case of positive week-3 PET-scan: 3 courses of EP chemotherapy (ARM C) Parallel observational cohort for patients scheduled to receive standard lumbo-aortic radiotherapy after orchiectomy

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: 1. Age ≥ 18 years on the day of signing informed consent. 2. Primary testicular seminomatous germ cell tumor. 3. Stage IIa/IIb \< 3 cm in largest diameter seminoma, histologically proved after orchiectomy. 4. Confirmation of a progressive disease (positive PET scan or increase of lymph nodes size by two successive CT scan). 5. Good prognosis according to IGCCCG and LDH \< 2.5 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN). 6. Normal alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) before and after orchiectomy. 7. No prior treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy. 8. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) ≤ 2. 9. Adequate bone-marrow, hepatic, and renal functions with: * Neutrophils ≥ 1.5 x Giga/l, platelets ≥ 100 x Giga/l, * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 1,5 x ULN, * Serum creatinine \< 140 µmol/l OR calculated clearance \> 60 ml/min (using either Cockcroft-Gault formula or Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) for \> 65 years old), * Total bilirubin ≤ ULN (if \> ULN, direct bilirubin ≤ ULN). 10. Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plans, laboratory tests, and other study procedures. 11. Accepting to use effective contraceptive measures or abstain from heterosexual activity, for the course of the study and through 12 months after the last dose of chemotherapy or being surgically sterile. All patients should seek advice regarding cryoconservation of sperm prior treatment initiation because of the possibility of infertility 12. Affiliation to a health insurance. 13. Signed and dated informed consent. Non-

Exclusion criteria

: 1. Extra-retroperitoneal metastasis on Computed tomography scan (CT scan). 2. Infection by Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), or active infection with the Hepatitis B or C virus. 3. History, within 2 years, of cancer other than seminoma, except for treated skin cancer (basal cell). 4. Uncontrolled or severe cardiovascular pathology. 5. Uncontrolled or severe hepatic pathology. 6. Patient deprived of liberty or requiring tutorship or curatorship. 7. Psychological, physical, sociological, or geographical conditions that would limit compliance with study protocol requirements (at the investigator's discretion). 8. Participation to another clinical trial, except for supportive care trials.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PFR-36MUp to 36 months after inclusionProgression-free rate at 36 months The PFR-36M is assumed to be a random variable following a binomial distribution Bin (n, p) where n is the sample size and p is the true underlying PFR-36M. Conclusions and inferences will be conducted on p. The prior distribution of p (representing the knowledge of the progression-free rate probability prior to observing the data) will be pre-specified. In the absence of a strong idea about the PFR-36M to be observed, a non-informative prior distribution Beta (1,1) will be considered. Pr\[PFR-36M ≥ 80%\] will be expressed in each arm, associated with its 95% credibility interval. A treatment arm will be considered a positive sign for efficacy of de-escalation if there is a high probability that PFR-36M will be higher or equal to 80%: Pr\[PFR-36M ≥ 80%\] ≥ 90%. It means that if most of the distribution (90% of it) falls to the right hand side of 80%, it indicates that it is very likely that the effect is at least 80%

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
miRNA-M371Up to 5 yearsSerum level of miRNA-M371 as a potential biomarker of response. Association between serum level of miRNA M371 and response to treatments (according to RECIST v1.1) will be evaluated using a non-parametric Wilcoxon Mann and Whitney test and describe with boxplots.
Association of PET scan results and miRNA-M371 rateUp to 5 yearsCorrelation between serum level of miRNA M371 and FDG-PET results (metabolic response) will be evaluated using the Kendall rank correlation and describe graphically.
Overall survival (OS)Up to 3 yearsThe Overall Survival will be defined as the time from date of inclusion to the date of death, from any cause. Patient whose death is not known at the time of analysis will be censored based on the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) approach will be used to estimate median OS. Median OS as well as Survival rates at specific timepoints will be presented together with their 95% confidence interval (CI).
Quality of life (QoL)Up to 20 monthsThe QoL will be assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.
Tolerance to treatmentUp 5 yearsThe tolerance to each treatment will be described mainly on the frequency of adverse events (AEs) and their intensity and severity determined using the National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) grading scale version 5. Descriptive statistics will be provided for characterizing and assessing patient tolerance to treatment. AEs will be described and coded, in total and per System Organ Class and Preferred Term with Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) coding

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTEllen BLANC
ellen.blanc@lyon.unicancer.fr+33 4 78 78 29 67
CONTACTAude FLECHON, Dr
aude.flechon@lyon.unicancer.fr+ 33 4 78 78 26 43
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAude FLECHON, Dr

Centre Leon Berard (Lyon, France)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 16, 2026