Skip to content

Kegel Exercises for Stress Urinary Incontinence

Effectiveness of Supervised Kegel Exercises Using Bio-feedback Versus Unsupervised Kegel Exercises on Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Quasi-experimental Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05529238
Enrollment
29
Registered
2022-09-07
Start date
2019-06-18
Completion date
2019-08-18
Last updated
2023-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Incontinence,Stress

Brief summary

Study about a targeted group of women suffering from self-reported stress urinary incontinence, attend a Kegel exercise training program. The group was divided into two; supervised and unsupervised. Whilst both groups benefited from initially seeing a women's health physiotherapist for a pelvic floor muscle assessment and a bespoke Kegel exercise program, only the supervised group continued to see the physiotherapist for monthly bio-feedback training. The unsupervised group relied on their own motivation to perform their Kegel exercises as prescribed. At the end of the twelve week program, both groups had a final pelvic floor muscle strength assessment by the physiotherapist to determine any changes and subsequent improvements in urinary incontinence. Aim : Investigate and compare the efficacy of supervised Kegel exercises with biofeedback on Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) and Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength (PFMS) compared to unsupervised Kegel exercises. The primary goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of supervised Kegel exercises using BT versus unsupervised Kegel exercises without biofeedback training, on SUI. A secondary outcome was to establish whether an improvement was observed in PFMS and subsequently, the effect of this on SUI. It was hypothesized that regular support and visual motivation and direction of BT from the physiotherapist, would provide greater results.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALbiofeedback training

participants received biofeedback training for kegel exercises in the supervised group. the unsupervised group practised their Kegel exercises at home

Sponsors

Charles Darwin University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* being female * aged over 18 years * suffer from SUI (their subjective disclosure was based on a description provided for their reference) * did not perform Kegel exercises * be available for duration of 12-week program

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy and breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incontinence severity index (ISI) toolWeek 0self-reported questionnaire describing frequency/severity of urinary incontinence. the higher the number, the higher the impact.
Incontinence severity (ISI) index toolWeek 12self-reported questionnaire describing frequency/severity of urinary incontinence. the higher the number, the higher the impact.
Pelvic floor assessment from physiotherapistweek 0pelvic floor muscle strength

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026