Skip to content

Parallel Versus Perpendicular Technique for Genicular Radiofrequency

Parallel Versus Perpendicular Technique for Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05528965
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-09-06
Start date
2022-09-05
Completion date
2023-09-15
Last updated
2023-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

Although there are different ways of performing genicular nerve radiofrequency on knee pain, to our knowledge, there is no stuies comparing the clinical outcomes of a parallel technique vs. a perpendicular technique. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of these both techniques.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPerpendicular Group

Radiofrequency ablation was applied to the perpendicular group by placing the tip of electrode perpendicularly to contact the genicular nerves.

PROCEDUREParallel Group

Radiofrequency ablation was applied to the parallel group by placing the electrode lay parallel to contact the genicular nerves.

Sponsors

Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\-

Exclusion criteria

* Intra-articular injections in the knee during the 3 months prior to procedure * Chronic pain syndrome * Lumbar radicular pain * Patients who are unwilling or mentally incapable to complete the study questionnaires.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The proportion of patients with a pain reduction of at least 50% compared to baseline expressed by the numerical rating scale (NRS)6 months after intervention.The proportion of patients with a pain reduction of at least 50% compared to baseline expressed by the numerical rating scale (NRS) (0-10).The lower the score, the least pain the patient experiences.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)6 months after intervention.WOMAC is a 24-item scale under the headings of pain, stiffness and functional activity. Patients rate the amount of strain, pain felt, and joint stiffness during daily activities between 0 and 4 (0 is the best, 4 is the worst), and the total score is between 0 and 96.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026