Female Infertility
Conditions
Brief summary
Although Caesarean section (CS) is often a necessary surgical intervention, it may also be associated with an increased risk of short- and long-term sequelae. It was thought that CS may increase the risk of female subfertility or even infertility. In assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles, the process of implantation is believed to be the most important factor in determining pregnancy outcome. In view of conflicting results on the influence of a previous CS on outcomes of ART, this study will be conducted to investigate the impact of the mode of previous delivery on ICSI outcomes.
Detailed description
The use of CS has steadily increased worldwide and will continue increasing over the current decade where both unmet need and overuse are expected to coexist. The medical field now acknowledges a patient's right to actively participate in her choice of medical treatments, including the method of delivery what is known as CS on demand, a primary CS performed on the mother's request without any recognized medical or obstetric Indications that may also increase the rate of C.S. Although CS is often a necessary surgical intervention, it may also be associated with an increased risk of short- and long-term sequelae eg. infection, haemorrhage and increased risk of several obstetric complications in subsequent pregnancies, including mal-placentation, Caesarean scar pregnancies, morbidly adherent placentae and uterine rupture. It was thought that CS may increase the risk of female subfertility or even infertility. The possible reasons for this impact on fertility may be related to infections, adhesions formation, placental bed disruption or other non-medical factors (age, culture, education). Different mechanisms were hypothesized to explain the detrimental uterine environment associated with the presence of CS niche, that may lead to subfertility including accumulation of intrauterine fluid, altered immunobiology, increased inflammation, distorted contractility of the uterus caused by fibrosis or interruption of the myometrial layer at the site of the niche. In ART cycles, the process of implantation is believed to be the most important factor in determining pregnancy outcome, because the embryos are directly transferred into the uterine cavity and so the tubal factor can be excluded. To date, knowledge on the influence of a previous CS on outcomes of ART is limited with different conclusions in terms of live birth, miscarriage and implantation rates. In view of these conflicting results, more adequately powered studies are warranted. Therefore, this study will be conducted to investigate the impact of the mode of previous delivery on ICSI outcomes.
Interventions
PROCEDUREFrozen embryo transfer
All women in both groups will receive oral estradiol valerate 8 mg/ day from the second day of the menstrual cycle. Endometrial thickness will be assessed by vaginal ultrasonography at the tenth day of treatment. When endometrial thickness reached ≥ 7 mm all subjects, in addition to estrogen, they will receive progesterone vaginal suppositories 400 mg twice daily and 100 mg of progesterone intramuscularly daily. Frozen thawed embryo transfer will be at day 6 of progesterone. Estrogen and progesterone will be continued until 9-10 weeks of gestation
Sponsors
Alexandria University
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patient age 20-35years. * BMI 18- 30. * Women with some indications for freeze all technique as patients with high risk for developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), patients with treatable tubal or uterine anomalies that were discovered during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) or in patients with elevated serum progesterone levels
Exclusion criteria
* Severe form of endometriosis. * Congenital uterine anomalies. * Scarred uterus due to previous myomectomy. * Women diagnosed with moderate to severe degrees of intrauterine adhesions. * Women with fibroid uteri. * Patients with bad quality embryos. * Untreated hydrosalpinges. * All fresh transfer cycles will be excluded.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Implantation rate | 4 weeks after embryo transfer | The ratio between the number of gestational sacs visualized by transvaginal ultrasound and the number of transferred embryos. |
| Clinical pregnancy | 4 weeks after embryo transfer | Determined by the visualization of a viable embryo within the uterine cavity by ultrasound 4 weeks after embryo transfer. Clinical pregnancy rate will be calculated as the number of clinical pregnancies divided by the number of embryo transfer procedures. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemical pregnancy | 11 days after embryo transfer | Positive pregnancy test 11 days after embryos transfer followed by abnormally rising or subsequently declining human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels along with the absence of a visualized gestational sac on a transvaginal ultrasound. The biochemical pregnancy rate is defined as the total number of biochemical pregnancies divided by the total number of positive pregnancy tests following an embryo transfer. |
| Ongoing pregnancy | 18 week after embryo transfer | Ratio between ongoing pregnancies proceeding beyond the 20th gestational weeks to the number of embryo transfer procedures |
| Miscarriage rate | 18 week after embryo transfer | Calculated as the total number of pregnancies that failed to progress after visualization of an intrauterine gestational sac divided by the total number of clinically recognized intrauterine pregnancies. |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed