Skip to content

Risk Perception in Multiple Sclerosis

Risk Perception in Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05528666
Enrollment
4361
Registered
2022-09-06
Start date
2021-09-09
Completion date
2021-09-17
Last updated
2022-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis (MS),, Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs),, High efficacy treatments (HETs),, Nonhigh efficacy treatments (Non-HETs)

Brief summary

This study was a retrospective, non-interventional, cross-sectional, multi-cohort study of patients clinically diagnosed with RMS (RRMS and SPMS). Patients were classified according to the immediate previous treatment in two groups, those who were prescribed with high efficacy treatments (HETs) and those who were prescribed with non-high efficacy treatments (non-HETs). HET include alemtuzumab, ofatumumab, ocrelizumab, natalizumab, cladribine, fingolimod and ozanimod; and non-HETs include molecules classified as with moderate or modest efficacy such as: interferons, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide.

Detailed description

The study cohort consisted of RMS patients identified in the Adelphi Real World MS DSP, which was current up until the Q2/2021. The study was using waves VI-IX of the Adelphi DSP dataset. Study period: Q1 2017 - Q1 & Q2 2021 (waves VI-IX of Adelphi DSP dataset). Identification period: Q1 2017 - Q1 & Q2 2021 (waves VI-IX of Adelphi DSP dataset). Index date: defined as the dates when the surveys were carried out (Q1 2017 - Q1 & Q2 2021).

Interventions

OTHERHigh Efficacy Therapy (HET)

HET include alemtuzumab, ofatumumab, ocrelizumab, natalizumab, cladribine, fingolimod and ozanimod.

OTHERNon High Efficacy Therapy (Non-HET)

Non-HETs include molecules classified as with moderate or modest efficacy such as: interferons, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients included in the database with a diagnosis of RRMS and SPMS. * Patients with current treatment at the index date. * Patients with previous treatment at the index date. * Patients to whom the physician decided to switch the treatment from the previous treatment to current treatment at the index date. * Patients (males & females) with 18 years or older at index date.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients included in the database with the diagnosis of primary progressive MS (PPMS). * Patients with other major neurological or psychiatric condition, which could potentially hinder the analysis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients who were switched based on risk perception (infections, malignancies, others)Throughout the study, approximately 5 years (2017 to 2021)Proportion of patients who were switched based on risk perception (infections, malignancies, others) were reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients with Initial MS diagnosisBaselineNumber of patients with Initial MS diagnosis were reported.
Number of patients with Current MS diagnosisBaselineNumber of patients with Current MS diagnosis were reported.
Number of patients with previous disease modifying treatmentBaselineNumber of patients with previous disease modifying treatment were reported.
Number of patients with ranking of the frequency of switches due to risk perceptionThroughout the study, approximately 5 years (2017 to 2021)Proportion of patients who were switched based on risk perception (infections, malignancies, others) were reported.
Proportion of patients who switched due to lack of efficacyThroughout the study, approximately 5 years (2017 to 2021)Proportion of patients who switched due to lack of efficacy due to new or enlarging lesions on MRI, increase in the frequency and/or severity of the relapses, progression in physical disability measured by EDSS or patient compliance issues between groups were reported.
Number of patients: Employment statusBaselinePatient employment status reported
Number of relapsesBaselineNumber of relapses were reported.
Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)BaselineThe Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis and monitoring changes in the level of disability over time. The EDSS scale ranges from 0 to 10 in 0.5 unit increments that represent higher levels of disability.
AgeBaselineAge information reported
GenderBaselineGender information reported
Proportion of patients who changed treatment group versus patients who continued in the same treatment groupThroughout the study, approximately 5 years (2017 to 2021)Proportion of patients who changed treatment group versus patients who continued in the same treatment group were reported.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026