Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Conditions
Brief summary
We aimed to evaluate the effect of ERAS nursing program on self-reported outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive lung cancer surgery, and compared the differences in length of hospital stay, complications, and readmission rate between ERAS and non-ERAS nursing programs
Interventions
PROCEDUREERAS nursing
Patients were given education before surgery, fluid and anesthetic drug management during surgery, early ambulation, fluid management and early feeding after surgery, etc
PROCEDUREnon eras nursing
Patients were under the routine management without eras protocol
Sponsors
The Second Hospital of Shandong University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* ≥18years,Minimally invasive elective surgery,cooperate
Exclusion criteria
* Pneumonectomy was performed and converted to open surgery Surgery intensive care, unable to cooperate (language Speech disorders, psychopathology)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self-reported Outcomes of Patients(PRO) | at baseline, daily after surgery, and weekly up to 4 after discharge weekly. | Use MD Anderson Symptom Checklist - Lung Cancer Symptom to measure severity and functional status |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| length of stay (LOS), postoperative cardiopulmonary complications (CPC) and readmission rate (READM) | From admission to one month after the patient's discharge | length of stay (LOS), postoperative cardiopulmonary complications (CPC) and readmission rate (READM) |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary Contactying liu
Backup ContactHongju Wang
Outcome results
None listed