Fractures Bone
Conditions
Keywords
Fracture ankle, Fracture foot, Frature metatarsus, Ultrasound, X-ray
Brief summary
To investigate the diagnostic value of ultrasound performed by a lay experimenter compared to standard radiographic imaging (or standard x-ray) in the detection of fractures in patients with closed acute ankle trauma and positive Ottawa ankle rules
Detailed description
Selection of patients is according to the criteria detailed below. If the patient is deemed eligible for the study, he will be asked to read and sign the informed consent. Besides standard history taking, physical examination and radiographic imaging, a standardized ultrasound examination of the ankle joint will be performed by a lay experimenter. Care will be provided by the attending physician and, according to standard of care, treatment decisions will be based on history taking, physical examination and conventional ankle x-ray series. Sonographic results will not be used for this purpose. All ankle x-ray series will be reviewed by a senior resident radiologist.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Any adult patient with acute ankle trauma \+ one or more criteria of the Ottawa ankle rules : * Inability to walk 4 steps immediately after the trauma or in the emergency room, * pain at the level of the internal or external malleolus (the distal 6 cm) or the base of the 5th metatarsal bone.
Exclusion criteria
* Any patient under the age of 18 years * Any patient unable to sign the informed consent * Skin lesions contraindicating sonography (e.g. open fracture wound, … ) * An unstable patient whose inclusion in the study would delay vital treatment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Negative predictive value | at inclusion | Negative predictive value of ultrasound compared to standard radiography in the detection of long bone fractures |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | at inclusion | of ultrasound compared to standard radiography in the detection of long bone fractures |
| Specificity | at inclusion | of ultrasound compared to standard radiography in the detection of long bone fractures |
Countries
Belgium
Contacts
Primary ContactLaeticia Vaiana FL Frezals, Médecin
Backup ContactAlain PA Plumacker, Médecin
Outcome results
None listed