Anxiety, Cognitive Impairment, Dementia
Conditions
Keywords
Dementia, Cognitive Impairment, Anxiety, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, Technology, Telehealth, Randomized Control Trial
Brief summary
This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a remotely-delivered, technology-assisted psychotherapy program, supported by an innovative software platform for people with cognitive impairment experiencing anxiety.
Detailed description
Despite harmful health and economic consequences, anxiety is a vexing issue in persons with cognitive impairment with inadequate treatment options. What is needed currently is a digital technology option for treating anxiety in persons with cognitive impairment that can be rigorously evaluated and implemented. The objective of the study is to test the efficacy of a newly modified psychotherapy package (Tech-CBT), which incorporates Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) methods, assisted with technology and telehealth for persons with cognitive impairment experiencing anxiety. This project will also investigate the cost-effectiveness, usability and acceptability of Tech-CBT to enhance delivery of anxiety treatment for people with cognitive impairment. A process evaluation will inform its implementation in the community and memory clinics, and will recommend a strategic translational roadmap to enhance delivery of anxiety treatment in health services with a broad reach.
Interventions
The Tech-CBT intervention is a manualised package that incorporates Cognitive Behavioural Therapy methods.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Persons aged 18 years or over * Persons with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia of any aetiology based on a previous diagnosis by a clinician or scoring above threshold (≤32; MCI ≤32 and dementia ≤27) for cognitive impairment in the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Impairment (TICS-M). * Screening positive for anxiety (scoring ≥9 on Geriatric Anxiety Inventory, GAI), and/or subjective complaints of anxiety and/ or clinician diagnosis of a current anxiety disorder and screening positive for anxiety using the Rating Anxiety in Dementia scale (scoring ≥11 on RAID)
Exclusion criteria
* Persons with severe dementia * Persons unable to communicate or complete questionnaires * Persons who have a current risk of suicide within the last month as determined by the study clinical expert team. * Persons with major depression as the primary complaint without reported symptoms of anxiety * Persons with comorbid psychiatric conditions
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in anxiety | Post-assessment (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 54 (lower score indicates better outcomes). | Change from baseline in anxiety as measured by the Rating Anxiety in Dementia Scale (RAID). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in quality of life | Post-assessment (~week 8), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 52 (higher score indicates better outcomes). | Change from baseline in quality of life as measured by the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) |
| Change in anxiety | Post-assessment (~week 8), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 20 (lower score indicates better outcomes). | Change from baseline in anxiety as measured by the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) |
| Change in worry | Post-assessment (~week 8), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 8 to 40 (lower score indicates better outcomes). | Change from baseline in worry as measured by the abbreviated version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ-A). |
| Change in stress | Post-assessment (~week 8), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 56 (lower score indicates better outcomes). | Change from baseline in stress as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14). |
| Change in depressive symptoms | Post-assessment (~week 8), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 15 (lower score indicates better outcomes). | Change from baseline in depressive symptoms as measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). |
| Change in carer burden | Post-assessment (~week 8), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 88 (lower score indicates better outcomes). | Change from baseline in carer burden as measured by the Zarit Burden Inventory (ZBI). |
| Change in carer quality of life | Post-assessment (~week 8), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 20 to 99 (lower score indicates better outcomes). | Change from baseline in carer quality of life as measured by the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL). |
| Change in carer depression and anxiety symptoms | Post-assessment (~week 8). Score ranging between 0 to 126 (lower score indicates better outcomes). | Change from baseline in carer depression and anxiety symptoms as measured by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21). |
| For people living with Parkinson's Disease, a change in Parkinsonism symptomology | Post-assessment (~week 8), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 3500 (lower score indicates better outcomes). | Change from baseline in Parkinsonism symptomology as measured by the Patient Reported Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease (PRO-PD). |
| For people living with Parkinson's Disease, a change in anxiety | Post-assessment (~week 8). Score ranging between 0 to 40 (lower score indicates better outcomes). | Change from baseline in anxiety as measured by the Parkinson's disease Specific Anxiety Inventory (PDSAI). |
Countries
Australia