Skip to content

Laparoscopic IPOM Plus vs. eTEP Trial

Comparison of Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM Plus) and Extended Totally Extraperitoneal (eTEP) Repair for Incisional Hernia - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05528107
Enrollment
72
Registered
2022-09-06
Start date
2023-02-14
Completion date
2025-07-05
Last updated
2026-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Incisional Hernia of Midline of Abdomen

Keywords

incisional ventral hernia, IPOM, eTEP, pain

Brief summary

The survey will compare primary and secondary outcomes of laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM plus) and extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair for incisional hernia. The research hypothesis is the following: patients who underwent eTEP repair may experience 30% less pain, assessed on the NRS-11 scale by the end of postoperative day 1, compared with IPOM plus procedure

Detailed description

The use of minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of patients with incisional ventral hernias has significant advantages over open surgery. According to the current guidelines, the optimal technique for IPOM repair is a combination of suturing hernia defect and implantation an intraperitoneal anti-adhesive coated mesh prosthesis - the so-called "IPOM plus" technology (R.Bittner et al., 2019). The development of laparoscopic surgery has led to the new minimally invasive technique for ventral hernia repair - extended-view totally extraperitoneal plasty (eTEP) (I. Belyansky et al., 2018). An important advantage of eTEP is the non-fixation technique of implant placement due to correct positioning compared to the need for combined fixation for IPOM or IPOM plus, which probably affects on the level of postoperative pain in the early postoperative period. The results of the first RCT comparing IPOM and eTEP ventral hernia repair were recently published (Mayank J. et al., 2022). It was demonstrated the benefits of eTEP repair in several aspects: less pain in the early postoperative period, as well as a faster return to physical activity and lower intervention costs. However, a significant limitation of this RCT is the analysis of interventions in a mixed group of patients with primary ventral and incisional hernias, as well as the use of IPOM procedure without suturing the hernia defect. The sample size was determined based on the above hypothesis regarding the primary point of the study. Considering trial of Asencio F. et al. (2009) in a group of patients with incisional ventral hernias, the level of pain at the end of the first postoperative day after IPOM repair was 4.76 according to the VAS (visual analog scale) with a standard deviation of 1.975. Assuming α (type I error rate) 0.05, β 0.20, it would need a total sample size of 60 patients. Taking into account the probability of loss of patients in the evaluation of long-term results up to 20%, 72 patients will be required (36 patients per group). Taking into account the inconsistency of the literature data on the level of pain in the early postoperative period after IPOM procedure for incisional ventral hernia repair, as well as the established primary point of the study, the investigators plan an additional calculation with correction of the sample size after evaluation intermediate results upon reaching 50% of enrolled patients of the initially established.

Interventions

PROCEDURELap IPOM plus

Participants will undergo Lap IPOM plus repair according to the assigned treatment arm.

PROCEDUREeTEP

Participants will undergo eTEP repair according to the assigned treatment arm.

Sponsors

City Clinical Hospital No.1 named after N.I. Pirogov
Lead SponsorOTHER
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* midline incisional hernia * defect width 2-6 cm * ASA I-II class * Elective hernia repair * Considered eligible for minimally invasive ventral hernia repair * Able to give informed consent * Able to tolerate general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* primary ventral herna * lateral hernia with/without midline * defect width more than 6 cm * refuse to give informed consent * prior mesh placement in the retrorectus space

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain on postoperative day 1postoperative day 1Pain score will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. The mean pain score is calculated between pain values at rest and on coughing. Participants verbally requested to rate their pain : "Rate your pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)". 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain on postoperative days 7 and 30postoperative 7 (±1) and 30 (±3) daysPain score will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. The mean pain score is calculated between pain values at rest and on physical activity. Participants verbally requested to rate their pain : "Rate your pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)". 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
number of participants with chronic painpostoperative day 100 (±5 days)Persisted pain in surgical site more than 90 days after surgery. Pain score will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Participants verbally requested to rate their pain : "Rate your pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)". 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
length of stay30 days after surgeryFrom date of hospital admission until discharge. The length of hospital stay (days)
postoperative complications30 days after surgeryNumber of participants with postoperative complications, evaluated by Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications from Dindo et al.
analgetic consumption48 hours after surgeryConsumption of analgesics during the first 48 hours after surgery
pain 6 hours after surgery6 hours (± 1 hour) after surgeryPain score will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. The mean pain score is calculated between pain values at rest and on coughing. Participants verbally requested to rate their pain : "Rate your pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)". 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.

Countries

Russia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 6, 2026