Skip to content

Evaluation of the Cosmetic Outcomes of Totally Endoscopic Cardiac Surgery

Evaluation of the Cosmetic Outcomes of Totally Endoscopic Cardiac Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05527756
Acronym
SCARMICS
Enrollment
80
Registered
2022-09-06
Start date
2022-10-21
Completion date
2023-05-27
Last updated
2024-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, Scar

Brief summary

Totally endoscopic cardiac surgery (TECS) is considered to have aesthetic advantages over conventional median sternotomy due to the smaller incisions. Most research regarding TECS focuses on clinical outcomes instead of cosmetic consequences. Following surgery, postoperative scarring is unavoidable and may negatively affect the patient's physical and emotional well-being. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the cosmesis after TECS.

Detailed description

Totally endoscopic cardiac surgery (TECS) is considered to have aesthetic advantages over conventional median sternotomy due to the smaller incisions. Most research regarding TECS focuses on clinical outcomes instead of cosmetic consequences. Following surgery, postoperative scarring is unavoidable and may negatively affect the patient's physical and emotional well-being. One previous study compared median sternotomy cardiac surgery and TECS in terms of the long-term cosmetic appearance of postoperative scars. They concluded that scars were considered more satisfactory, less painful, and itchy in the TECS group in the Chinese population. To our knowledge, this is the only study published regarding cosmetic consequences after TECS. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the cosmesis after TECS.

Interventions

OTHERScar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale

The SCAR scale consists of two simple questions about symptoms (itch and pain) with yes/no response options that are responded to by the patient and six clinician-related items that are rated by observers through photos of the incisions. This scale includes both objective measurements and patient-reported symptoms

The NRS scale, in which the patients score the cosmetic appearance of the scar from 0 to 10, is questioned.

Sponsors

Jessa Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients older than 18 years old * Patients who can give their informed consent * Patients who speak Dutch or French

Exclusion criteria

* Patients that previously underwent cardiac surgery * Patients that will undergo a combination of cardiac surgeries

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate the cosmesis through the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale at postoperative day one.Postoperative day oneThe SCAR scale includes both objective measurements and patient-reported symptoms. A low score corresponds to a good scar cosmesis and a high score to a bad scar cosmesis.
Evaluate the cosmesis through the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale at postoperative day 14.Postoperative day 14The SCAR scale includes both objective measurements and patient-reported symptoms. A low score corresponds to a good scar cosmesis and a high score to a bad scar cosmesis.
Evaluate the cosmesis through the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale at postoperative day 30.Postoperative day 30The SCAR scale includes both objective measurements and patient-reported symptoms. A low score corresponds to a good scar cosmesis and a high score to a bad scar cosmesis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cosmetic assessment from the patients through the numerical rating scale (NRS) at postoperative day one.Postoperative day oneThe cosmetic appearance of the scar is scored from 0 to 10, whereas 0 contributes to not satisfied with the scar and 10 with very satisfied with the scar.
Cosmetic assessment from the patients through the numerical rating scale (NRS) at postoperative day 14.Postoperative day 14The cosmetic appearance of the scar is scored from 0 to 10, whereas 0 contributes to not satisfied with the scar and 10 with very satisfied with the scar.
Cosmetic assessment from the patients through the numerical rating scale (NRS) at postoperative day 30.Postoperative day 30The cosmetic appearance of the scar is scored from 0 to 10, whereas 0 contributes to not satisfied with the scar and 10 with very satisfied with the scar.

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026