ICU Acquired Weakness, Morality, Quality of Life
Conditions
Keywords
ICU, Quality of life, Medical research council sum score, Mortality, early mobilization
Brief summary
In a study published in 2018 the research team had collected the Medical Research Council score (MRCs) at Intensive Care Unit (ICU) discharge. The investigators would like to be able to examine, if the preliminary results obtained by in 2020 by Van Aerde's team are confirmed in their cohort. The investigators hypothesize that patients with an MRCs less than or equal to 55 at discharge from the ICU, have a higher mortality rate than those with a score greater than 55. The investigators would also like to examine whether or not an MRCs score ≤ 55 is associated with a difference in quality of life and autonomy, after 5 and more years post ICU.
Detailed description
Study design Prospective, observational study. 1. Research of vital status 2. Completion of two questionnaires (Short Form-36 and Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living), to assess quality of life and level of autonomy in activities of daily living, either by telephone or completed directly by hand by the patient from his place of residence.
Interventions
OTHERQuestionnaires
Written or by phone
Sponsors
Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Have participated in the Promorea1 study * Alive at the time the questionnaires were sent
Exclusion criteria
* Opposition to the use of vital status data * Extra-national patient not on the national registry
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 5 years mortality | Before sending questionnaires | Vital status |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey | through study completion, an average of 6 months | The 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) is an oft-used, well-researched, self-reported measure of health. It stems from a study called the Medical Outcomes Study. It comprises 36 questions which cover eight domains of health. The recommended scoring system for the SF-36 is a weighted Likert system for each item. Items in the subscales are summed to obtain a summary score for each subscale or dimension. Each of the 8 summary scores is linearly transformed on a scale from 0 (negative to health) to 100 (favorable to health) to obtain a score for each subscale. |
| Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living questionnaire | through study completion, an average of 6 months | The Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, commonly referred to as the Katz ADL, is the most appropriate instrument to assess functional status as a measurement of the client's ability to perform activities of daily living independently. Clinicians typically use the tool to detect problems in performing activities of daily living and to plan care accordingly. The Index ranks adequacy of performance in the six functions of bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, and feeding. Clients are scored yes/no for independence in each of the six functions. A score of 6 indicates full function, 4 indicates moderate impairment, and 2 or less indicates severe functional impairment. The instrument is most effectively used among older adults in a variety of care settings, when baseline measurements, taken when the client is well, are compared to periodic or subsequent measures. |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed