Skip to content

High Flow Nasal Cannula vs Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients With Hypoxic Respiratory Failure Following Blunt Chest Trauma

High Flow Nasal Cannula vs Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients With Hypoxic Respiratory Failure Following Blunt Chest Trauma, a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05527431
Enrollment
120
Registered
2022-09-02
Start date
2022-08-01
Completion date
2024-04-01
Last updated
2024-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blunt Injury of Thorax

Brief summary

to compare high flow nasal cannula against noninvasive ventilation in patients with non-sever blunt chest trauma in improvement of oxygenation, need for intubation and mechanical ventilation within 28 days

Interventions

DEVICEhigh flow nasal cannula

high flow nasal cannula

DEVICEnoninvasive ventilation

noninvasive ventilation

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 y, * Willing and able to provide written informed consent prior to performing study procedures, * currently hospitalized and requiring medical care for non-sever blunt chest trauma (abbreviated injury severity scale ≤ 2) SpO2 90% or less while breathing 10 L/min.

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications of noninvasive ventilation (face trauma or surgery, airway obstruction, upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, disturbed level of consciousness), -smoker * intubation for any cause other than respiratory cause

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PaO2/FiO2 ratio3 successive daysmean value of three successive PaO2/FiO2 ratio in mmHg between both groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Discomfort score3 successive daysDiscomfort related to oxygen delivery devices will be evaluated using a 10- point numeric scale which low number is low discomfort.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026