Skip to content

Effect of Kinesiotape Technique on Wrist Among Chronic Stroke Patients

Effect of Wrist Flexors Inhibition in Comparison to Wrist Extensors Facilitation Through Kinesiotaping Technique in Chronic Hemiplegic Stroke Patients With Limited Wrist Extension

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05526859
Enrollment
24
Registered
2022-09-02
Start date
2022-08-31
Completion date
2022-10-26
Last updated
2022-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Stroke

Keywords

Stroke, Manual Muscle testing, Kinesiotape, Range of Motion, Upper Extremity Functional Index, Modified Ashworth Scale

Brief summary

The aim of this randomized controlled is to assess the effect of kinesiotape technique upon wrist joint among the patients with chronic stroke. Patients are devided into groups, in group A kinesiotaping facilitation technique is applied on wrist extensor muscles while inhibition technique is applied on wrist flexor muscles and the result is the compared between the groups and within the group.

Detailed description

Stroke is a very common disease worldwide causing severe musculoskeletal disability due to which quality of life of patient compromises, patient becomes dependent of assistance in daily living activities and few becomes bed ridden. Stroke also causes death of the patient. Apart from musculoskeletal issues patient's cognitive abilities are also effected. It is tough to manage these patients as stroke varies in types and symptoms. Symptoms and severity depend upon type of stroke and factors like lifestyle, age and health issues. According to the symptoms different physiotherapy techniques and rehabilitation is used along with medical treatment and counseling of the patient. Kinesiotape also has the advantage that it can be worn 3-5 days due to which it's effects remains for long time as compare to other treatments which are given and has effect for a specific time for example a session of physical therapy including exercises is for an hour but this tape can be worn for days once applied. Randomized controlled trial was done, 24 patients were recruited according to inclusion exclusion criteria. Patients were further divided into two groups; group 1 was given muscular facilitation treatment for wrist extensors and group 2 was given sessions for muscle inhibition treatment for wrist flexors. 6 sessions were given, 1 session per week over the period of 6 weeks to each patient. Wrist range of motion for extension, flexion, ulnar and medial deviation was measured using goniometer before and after the 6 weeks. Manual muscle test for wrist extensors, modified ashworth scale and upper limb functional index scoring was done before and after sessions. Data was collected from a private clinic of PWD Rawalpindi. The statistical values of result showed no significant change in between both the groups, before and after treatment. But a significant improvement was about observed within the group analysis It can be concluded from this study that Kinesiotape is an effective treatment method both in inhibiting and facilitating muscular performance. Hence both treatments were equally effective. it helps in increasing range of motion and in reducing spasticity.

Interventions

OTHERKinsiotaping for wrist flexor muscles

The flexor muscles of the wrist area will be targeted.

OTHERKinesiotaping for wrist extensor muscles

The extensor muscles of the wrist area will be targeted.

Sponsors

Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

The participants were blinded to the allocation in the experimental treatment groups.

Intervention model description

Two group were taken and given treatment with the concern study protocols.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age b/w 40 to 90 * Limited ROM (wrist extension)

Exclusion criteria

* Disoriented * Who needs more then moderate support to achieve basic ADL and are bed bound * Communication gap * Allergic to Kinesiotaping after being positive to patch test

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wrist extensors manual muscle test score6 weeksWrist extensors strength was measured as baseline before the start of intervention and was compared with the measurement after 6 weeks of application of kinesiotape.
Wrist ROMS through Goniometer6 weeksWrist ROM was measured using universal goniometer, baseline values for wrist flexion, extension, ulnar deviation and medial deviation was measured and then compared to the values measured after 6 weeks of intervention.
Spasticity through modified ashwoth scale6 weeksWrist spasticity was measured through modified ashworth scale before the intervention and then was compared with the values taken after 6th week
Upper extremity functional index (UEFI)6 weeksPatient was asked to perform different activities as opening the door and combing hair, score was done according to the difficulty level faced by patients while performing the activities. Measurement was taken before first session and was compared with the values taken after 6 weeks of intervention

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Primary ContactDr. Syed Ali Hussain, Phd*
alihussain_dpt.ahs@stmu.edu.pk+923315191713
Backup ContactDr. Nouman Khan, MS-OMPT
nouman_drs.ahs@stmu.edu.pk+923339378324

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026