Skip to content

Effectiveness Evaluation of the Digital Workflow for Single-implant Immediate Loading

Effectiveness Evaluation of the Digital Workflow for Single-implant Immediate Loading

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05526677
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-09-02
Start date
2022-09-01
Completion date
2025-06-30
Last updated
2022-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Single Missing Tooth Rehabilitation

Keywords

Single missing tooth, one-visit single-implant immediate loading, digital workflow, dynamic navigation, static surgical guide

Brief summary

Immediately implantation and immediate prosthesis could preserve the alveolar contour and gingival shape. The visiting time is quiet long. Pre-made prosthesis is a way to shorten the visiting time. But the implant has to be placed precisely. Novel digital workflow integrating dynamic navigation or static surgical guide to process one-visit single -implant immediate loading is possible. The study is to compare the x-guide dynamic navigation system or static guide system which one could assist the surgery more accuracy and place the prosthesis more smoothly.

Interventions

DEVICEx-guide dynamic navigation system

One implant placement is assisted with x-guide dynamic navigation system. The other implant placement is assisted with static surgical guide

Sponsors

National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan
CollaboratorOTHER
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 20 to 80 years old * Miss two functional opposing teeth in one quadrant or the same jaw * The situation of oral tissue satisfies the condition of implant immediate loading.

Exclusion criteria

* catastrophic illness, * diabetes, * cardiovascular diseases, * osteoporosis, * head and neck cancer, * disabled * pregnant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prosthesis success rateChange in photo on post operation immediately, post operation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 yearMorphology of the restoration
Record visiting timeduring procedureRecord the time (minutes) in every clinical procedure
Implant success rateChange in periapical film of the implant on post operation immediately, post operation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 yearNo osteointegration of implant
Implant stability quotient (ISQ)Change in post operation immediately, post operation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 yearimplant stability
surgical complicationsPost operation 1 weekpain, swelling, infection after surgery
prosthetic success ratesChange in post operation immediately, post operation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 yearfinal pink aesthetic score

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Type of incisionduring the operationflap or flapless

Contacts

Primary ContactHan-Jen Hsu, PhD
d80.wu63@msa.hinet.net+886 922909330

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026