Skip to content

Effect of Simvastatin Versus Calcium Hydroxide Intracanal Medications on Post-operative Pain and Interleukin 6 and 8

Effect of Simvastatin Versus Calcium Hydroxide Used as Intracanal Medicaments on Post-operative Pain and Total Amount of IL-6 and IL-8 in Periapical Fluids in Patients With Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05525013
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-09-01
Start date
2022-10-01
Completion date
2024-07-01
Last updated
2025-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periapical Periodontitis

Brief summary

Comparing the effect of Simvastatin versus calcium hydroxide used as an intracanal medicament on Post-operative Pain and Total amount of IL-6 and IL-8 in Periapical Fluids of lower premolars in patients with Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis:

Detailed description

Lower premolars with symptomatic apical periodontitis will be selected according to the eligibility and exclusion criteria and patients are then randomized to receive treatment either using simvastatin or calcium hydroxide intracanal medication for 1 week. The endodontic treatment will be completed in two visits. Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Numerical Rating scale at 6, 12, 24, 48 hours post-instrumentation and at 6, 12, 24, 48 hours post-obturation. Periapical fluid sample will be collected immediately post-instrumentation and 1 week later pre-obturation. The periapical samples will be analyzed for total amounts of IL-6 and IL-8.

Interventions

DRUGSimvastatin Powder

Simvastatin gel placed as an intracanal medication

DRUGCalcium Hydroxide

Calcium hydroxide intracanal medication

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

After the participant is confirmed eligible for the study, the participant will drag an envelope and will be given a number. Based on this number the patient will be allocated to either intervention or control group after contacting the co- supervisor to reveal the assigned group of the current patient according to the generated random sequence.

Intervention model description

A Computerized random sequence will be generated using computer software (http://www.random.org/). The sequence generation will be done for the patients' numbers which results in a sequence of random numbers divided in two columns (A & B), where one column assigned for the intervention groups and one for the control group and kept with the co- supervisor. The patients will be allocated into either of the two groups with allocation ratio 1:1

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who are free from any physical or mental handicapping condition with no underlying systemic disease. * Lower single rooted premolars: * Presence of pain with percussion. * Widening in the periodontal membrane space or with small sized periapical radiolucency. * Diagnosed clinically with symptomatic apical periodontitis. * Patients' acceptance to participate in the trial. * Patients who can understand pain scale and can sign the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Medically compromised patients * Pregnant women * Patients who are allergic to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. * Patients with two or more adjacent teeth requiring root canal therapy * If analgesics or antibiotics have been administrated by the patient during the past two weeks preoperatively. * Patients reporting bruxism or clenching. * Teeth associated with acute periapical abscess, swelling or a fistulous tract. * Greater than grade I mobility or pocket depth greater than 5mm. * Non restorable teeth. * Immature teeth. * Teeth with previous endodontic treatment. * Radiographic evidence of external or internal root resorption vertical root fracture, perforation, calcification.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post operative pain incidence and intensity assessed with numerical rating scale6,12,24 and 48 hours post-instrumentation and 6,12,24 and 48 hours post-obturation0 (none) to 10 (severe) Numerical Pain Rating Scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total amount of IL-6 and IL-8 in periapical fluidsImmediately post-instrumentation and pre-obturation (1 week post- instrumentation)Absorbance using ELISA test in Pg/ml

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026