Skip to content

Mechanical Bowel Preparation Versus no Bowel Preparation for Esophageal Cancer Surgery

Mechanical Bowel Preparation Versus no Bowel Preparation for Esophageal Cancer Surgery: a Multi-center, Randomized, Parallel, Single-blinded Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05523960
Enrollment
652
Registered
2022-09-01
Start date
2022-09-01
Completion date
2023-04-30
Last updated
2024-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Cancer

Brief summary

The study type was designed as a prospective multicenter randomized controlled study. The patients will be divided into intervention group and control group, 281 patients were needed for each group and 562 patients would be needed totally to show this difference. Due to a possible loss of 14%, the final sample size was calculated to be 652 patients. The intervention group will not implement mechanical bowel preparation(MBP) before surgery; the control group will receive routine preoperative MBP for oral administration of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder and fasting water. Perioperative complications, intestinal recovery speed and quality of life will be investigated between the two groups.

Detailed description

Patients allocated to MBP will be instructed by the study nurse to prepare their bowel mechanically by drinking 3\ 4L of polyethylene glycol (Polyethylene Glycol Electrolytes Powder 68.56g; Shenzhen, China) with water before 6pm in the evening the day before the surgery. Patients allocated to NBP were instructed to not prepare the bowel. The receipt of the allocated intervention will be controlled by study nurse asking the patients on the morning of the surgery whether they had acted as instructed by the allocation. This information will be also concealed from treating physicians and surgeons, data collectors, and data analysts, until the primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed. All patients will follow the ERAS protocol. Prophylactic intravenous antibiotics (cephamycin 1000mg) will be given to all patients 30 minutes before skin incision. The prophylactic intravenous antibiotics will re-administered if the surgery lasted longer than 3h from the first antibiotic dose. Surgical skin preparation will involve taking a bath well the night before operation without shaving the hair. Just before skin incision, the area will then washed three times with denatured 80% alcohol to left to dry.

Interventions

PROCEDURENo MBP

No mechanical bowel preparation before operation

Sponsors

Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who were scheduled for esophageal cancer resection in participating centers were eligible for inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

* need for emergency surgery; * previous chronic constipation or diarrhea; * previous abdominal surgery; need for colonic reconstruction; * other indications for mechanical preparation or contraindications; * allergy to drugs used in the trial (polyethylene glycol)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the rate of major complicationsduring surgery orwithin 30 days after surgeryA major intraoperative and postoperative complication was defined as a surgical or medical complication with a Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade of Ⅱor higher (this five-grade system includes sub-grades in grades Ⅲ and Ⅳ, and higher grades indicate more life-threatening complications) according to Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG)

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026