Insertion of Different Supraglottic Airway Devices on Manikin

Placement of Four Different Supraglottic Airway Devices by Medicine Faculty Students: A Manikin Study

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT05523752

Enrollment

Registered

2022-08-31

Start date

2022-03-01

Completion date

2022-08-15

Last updated

2022-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Management, Education, Ventilation

Keywords

Airway management, Supraglottic airway devices, Manikin study, education

Brief summary

When tracheal intubation and face mask ventilation fail, and the insertion of supraglottic airway devices (SHA) can provide ventilation, protecting the patient from hypoxemia. Supraglottic airway devices have become an important part of difficult airway algorithms. The European Resuscitation Council Guidelines recommend supraglottic airway devices for airway management by non-specialized healthcare providers. Education through simulators contributes to the development of students without direct contact with patients. In this study, it was aimed to compare the success of placement of four different supraglottic airway devices on the manikin of term 5 students who participate to the Anesthesiology and Reanimation internship.

Interventions

DEVICEProseal Laryngeal Mask

insertion of Proseal Laryngeal Mask

DEVICEClassic Laryngeal Mask

insertion of Classic Laryngeal Mask

DEVICEI-gel

insertion of I-gel

DEVICESuprema Laryngeal Mask

insertion of Suprema Laryngeal Mask

Study design

Allocation

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary purpose

OTHER

Masking

SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 30 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Studying in medical school in term 5 * To have completed anesthesiology and reanimation internship

Exclusion criteria

* who do not want to participate in the study * Students with previous experience with four airway devices

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
difficulty of attempts	during insertion procedure	pointing the difficulty of insertion from 0 to 100

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Time of attempts	during insertion procedure	time from insertion to ventilation
number of attempts	during insertion procedure	number of attempts for successfull placement

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026